Hacktoberfest 2026: die Issues, die Maintainer für den Oktober markiert haben – offen und einsteigerfreundlich. Hacktoberfest-Issues durchsuchen

[v2] RFC 9728 PRM URLs and resource matching drop query components

Offen
#3,065 2 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

Bewertung

Schwierigkeit
3/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
1-2 Tage
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
74/100
Issue-Typ
Bug
Klarheit
Klar beschrieben
Aktivitätsstatus
Aktiv
Tech-Stack
python
Bereich
authentication

Rechercherichtung

Beginne mit mcp.server.auth.routes.build_resource_metadata_url(), mcp.client.auth.utils.build_protected_resource_metadata_discovery_urls() und mcp.shared.auth_utils.check_resource_allowed(), und verfolge dann OAuthClientProvider._validate_resource_match(). Stelle die im Issue gezeigten Fälle mit Query-Parametern nach und füge fokussierte Auth-Tests hinzu; fertig ist die Arbeit, wenn Metadaten-URLs die Query beibehalten und unterschiedliche Query-Komponenten nicht mehr übereinstimmen.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Beschreibung

auth bug needs confirmation P2 v1 v2

What happened?

While testing the v2 auth/protected-resource-metadata path, I noticed query-bearing resource identifiers are treated as if the query is not part of the resource.

For a resource server URL like:

https://api.example.com/mcp?tenant=a

three SDK paths currently drop or ignore ?tenant=a:

  1. mcp.server.auth.routes.build_resource_metadata_url() returns:
https://api.example.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/mcp
  1. mcp.client.auth.utils.build_protected_resource_metadata_discovery_urls(None, resource) also tries:
https://api.example.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/mcp
https://api.example.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource
  1. mcp.shared.auth_utils.check_resource_allowed() treats different query components as matching, so the client accepts protected resource metadata for ?tenant=b when the server URL was ?tenant=a.

This is latent for path-only deployments, but it matters for query-routed or multi-tenant resource identifiers.

What did you expect?

RFC 9728 derives the protected-resource metadata URL by inserting /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource before the protected resource path and/or query. If the resource identifier includes a query component, the derived metadata URL and resource validation should not silently collapse it with a different query.

For https://api.example.com/mcp?tenant=a, I expected the path-specific metadata URL to be:

https://api.example.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/mcp?tenant=a

And a PRM document whose resource is https://api.example.com/mcp?tenant=b should not validate for a client configured with https://api.example.com/mcp?tenant=a.

Code to reproduce

import anyio
from pydantic import AnyHttpUrl, AnyUrl

from mcp.client.auth import OAuthClientProvider
from mcp.client.auth.utils import build_protected_resource_metadata_discovery_urls
from mcp.server.auth.routes import build_resource_metadata_url
from mcp.shared.auth import OAuthClientMetadata, ProtectedResourceMetadata
from mcp.shared.auth_utils import check_resource_allowed
from tests.interaction.auth._harness import InMemoryTokenStorage


async def main() -> None:
    resource = "https://api.example.com/mcp?tenant=a"

    print(build_resource_metadata_url(AnyHttpUrl(resource)))
    print(build_protected_resource_metadata_discovery_urls(None, resource))
    print(check_resource_allowed(
        "https://api.example.com/mcp?tenant=a",
        "https://api.example.com/mcp?tenant=b",
    ))

    provider = OAuthClientProvider(
        server_url=resource,
        client_metadata=OAuthClientMetadata(
            client_name="probe",
            client_uri=AnyHttpUrl("https://example.com"),
            redirect_uris=[AnyUrl("http://localhost:3030/callback")],
        ),
        storage=InMemoryTokenStorage(),
    )
    prm = ProtectedResourceMetadata(
        resource=AnyHttpUrl("https://api.example.com/mcp?tenant=b"),
        authorization_servers=[AnyHttpUrl("https://auth.example.com")],
    )
    await provider._validate_resource_match(prm)
    print("accepted mismatched query")


anyio.run(main)

Current output:

https://api.example.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/mcp
['https://api.example.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/mcp', 'https://api.example.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource']
True
accepted mismatched query

SDK version

Current main branch, v2 development line.

Area

Auth

AI-assisted (Claude/Codex) for navigation and review; change authored and understood by me.

Vorherrschende Sprache
Python
Sterne
24.3k
Forks
4k
Ø Merge
1 T. 11 Std.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
30

Beitragsleitfaden

Beitragsleitfaden öffnen

Erste Schritte

  1. Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
  4. Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Mehr aus modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk

Alle Issues in modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk

Ähnliche Issues

Weitere Issues zu Python

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.