RequestResponder.__exit__ leaks CancelledError on cancelled request, killing the stdio receive loop
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
Bewertung
- Schwierigkeit
- 3/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 1-2 Tage
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 68/100
Rechercherichtung
Beginne in mcp.shared.session.RequestResponder.exit und untersuche die Abbruchbehandlung rund um mcp/server/lowlevel/server.py nahe Zeile 766. Reproduziere dies mit tests/test_transport_recovery.py und überprüfe anschließend, dass das Abbrechen einer stdio-Anfrage weiterhin ihre Fehlerantwort erzeugt und dass eine nachfolgende Anfrage eine Antwort erhält, ohne dass die Empfangsschleife stoppt.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Beschreibung
Summary
When a client sends notifications/cancelled for an in-flight request handled over stdio, the server's receive loop task group dies. The process stays alive but stops reading stdin, so every subsequent request hangs and the client eventually reports MCP error -32000: Connection closed. The bug is racy — it reproduces in roughly 40–80% of attempts depending on platform timing.
Affects: mcp 1.26.0 and 1.27.1 (latest at time of writing). Confirmed with FastMCP 3.1.x and the in-tree stdio server.
Reproduction
A standalone subprocess test is in mlorentedev/hive tests/test_transport_recovery.py. The relevant flow:
initialize→ acknotifications/initializedtools/call id=2notifications/cancelledforrequestId=2(within a few ms of step 3)- Receive:
{"id": 2, "error": {"code": 0, "message": "Request cancelled"}}← OK tools/call id=3- No response. Server is alive but
proc.stdout.readline()hangs.
Root cause
mcp.shared.session.RequestResponder.__exit__:
def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb):
try:
if self._completed:
self._on_complete(self)
finally:
self._entered = False
...
self._cancel_scope.__exit__(exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb) # ← (A)
When notifications/cancelled arrives, RequestResponder.cancel() calls self._cancel_scope.cancel() and sends the error response. The handler task catches the CancelledError in mcp/server/lowlevel/server.py (around line 766) and returns. The with responder: block then exits with exc_type=None while the cancel scope is still in cancelled state — at line (A), anyio's CancelScope.__exit__ re-raises CancelledError.
That exception bubbles up to:
async with anyio.create_task_group() as tg:
async for message in session.incoming_messages:
tg.start_soon(self._handle_message, ...)
…in Server._run. anyio task groups cancel all sibling tasks and propagate the cancellation. The receive loop is one of those sibling tasks, so it dies.
Suggested fix
Swallow the spurious cancellation when the responder has already sent its response:
def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb):
try:
if self._completed:
self._on_complete(self)
finally:
self._entered = False
if not self._cancel_scope:
raise RuntimeError("No active cancel scope")
try:
self._cancel_scope.__exit__(exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb)
except BaseException as exc:
if self._completed and isinstance(exc, anyio.get_cancelled_exc_class()):
# cancel() already sent the error response — the scope's
# re-raised cancellation is spurious.
return
raise
Mirrors what we ship in hive src/hive/_compat.py.
Workaround used downstream
We monkey-patch RequestResponder.__exit__ at import time. The patch is self-gated (only fires when _completed=True AND the leaking exception is anyio.get_cancelled_exc_class()), so it stays inert once a fix lands upstream.
Environment
- Reproduced on Windows 11 (
mcp1.26.0, 1.27.1) and via Claude Code as the host. - Tracked downstream in mlorentedev/hive#75.
- Regression test passes 5/5 with the patch applied on Python 3.12; fails 2/5 — 4/5 without it.
- Python 3.13 appears to have additional uncancel semantics that the patch does not yet fully cover — verification in progress.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Python
- Sterne
- 24.3k
- Forks
- 4k
- Ø Merge
- 1 T. 11 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 30
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
- Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Mehr aus modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 75/100
modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk#3566 ·
-
v1 v2
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 85/100
modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk#3546 · 5 Kommentare ·
-
v1 v2
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 76/100
modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk#3545 · 1 Kommentar ·
-
v1 v2
Schwierigkeit 1/5 Unter einer Stunde Anfängerfreundlichkeit 91/100
modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk#3508 · 2 Kommentare ·
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 64/100
modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk#3504 ·
Alle Issues in modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk
Ähnliche Issues
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 75/100
anthropics/skills#1811 · 1 Kommentar ·
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 75/100
speaches-ai/speaches#678 ·
-
bug
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 75/100
datalayer/mcp-compose#42 ·
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 75/100
conda-forge/spacy-feedstock#177 ·
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 70/100
UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals#2523 ·