[rush] rushd: every warm request re-fingerprints the whole workspace (sync file walk, ajv schema recompiles, sync `ps` spawns on the daemon event loop)
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
Bewertung
- Schwierigkeit
- 4/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 3-5 Tage
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 45/100
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Klarheit
- Klar beschrieben
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Aktiv
- Tech-Stack
- nodejs, typescript
- Bereich
- performance, tooling
Rechercherichtung
Start by examining the files mentioned: WorkspaceInputFingerprint.ts (lines 62-99, 221-241) for the synchronous file walk and hashing, and LockFile for the ps spawn. Look at how WorkspaceRuntimeFingerprintCache is used and where ajv schema compilation occurs (JsonSchema.ensureCompiled). Profile the daemon with --cpu-prof to see the bottlenecks in action. The fix involves memoizing file stats, caching compiled schemas, and replacing synchronous calls with async or procfs reads. Testing requires a multi-project rush workspace to measure warm request latency before and after changes.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Beschreibung
Summary
Most of the daemon-side time for every warm request (tier-0 reuse path) goes to re-fingerprinting the whole workspace from scratch, before anything is scheduled. The cost grows with repo size, and part of the work is synchronous, so it blocks the event loop that serves all clients. After client startup (#6054) is fixed, this becomes the dominant fixed cost of a warm daemon request.
| workspace | captureWorkspaceInputFingerprintAsync (warm median) |
captureProjectConfigurationFingerprintAsync (median) |
sync runtime _hashPaths |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30-project synthetic | 61 ms | 22 ms | 22-27 ms |
| rushstack (196 projects) | 263 ms | 372 ms | 23 ms |
Fully warm no-op latency vs graph size (synthetic): 1.26 s at 1 project, 2.84 s at 50, 8.67 s at 300. That is about 25 ms per project, bound by re-validation. A daemon CPU profile over 12 warm requests in a 30-project workspace shows:
- lstat 466 ms and realpath 263 ms (from
_hashPaths/hashFilesAsync); - ajv schema compilation 530 ms (
JsonSchema.ensureCompiledvia heft-config-file: uncached project config loads recompile the schemas); LockFile.tryAcquire -> getProcessStartTime -> spawnSync('ps')353 ms, about 30-54 ms per call. It runs on every request (acquireExecutionLeaseAsync), in warm-set maintenance, and in#prepareAsync.
As a result, the daemon event loop stalls for up to 190-260 ms (p99) while preparing warm requests, delaying every other client.
Repro steps
Call the same rush-lib functions that WorkspaceRequestLifecycle calls on the tier-0 path (#captureAsync at WorkspaceRequestLifecycle.ts:373 and captureProjectConfigurationFingerprintAsync at :384), with a persistent WorkspaceRuntimeFingerprintCache, 10 times against a 30-project and a 196-project workspace. Or profile the daemon (--cpu-prof) during repeated warm no-op rush-client build requests.
Expected result: Warm requests do incremental work proportional to what changed: stat-identity memoization of definition files, cached compiled schemas, and cached runtime fingerprints. Nothing synchronous or subprocess-based sits on the daemon event loop per request.
Actual result: Full recomputation on every request, with a synchronous file walk, schema recompiles, and a synchronous ps spawn.
Details
Root cause (main @ 60007c9a8c):
libraries/rush-lib/src/api/WorkspaceInputFingerprint.ts:62-99(_hashPaths): a synchronous recursive readdir plusstatSync/realpathSyncof the ~500+ runtime files on every capture.:221-241(hashFilesAsync): re-reads and re-hashes every definition file (rush.json, common/config/**, 4 files per project) with concurrency 3, with no stat memo.:199-215(captureProjectConfigurationFingerprintAsync): uncached project configuration loads recompile ajv schemas.LockFilegetProcessStartTimespawnspssynchronously. On Linux, read/proc/<pid>/statinstead.
Suggested fix: memoize by file identity (dev/ino/size/mtime/ctime), making hashes a cheap stat check; cache compiled schemas process-wide; compute the runtime fingerprint once per process, since runtime files cannot change without a restart; replace the synchronous ps with procfs; and move the remaining synchronous I/O off the event loop.
This was found during an automated performance/behavior analysis of rush-client/rushd on Linux and independently confirmed.
Standard questions
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
@microsoft/rush globally installed version? |
built from main @ 60007c9a8c (5.179.0) |
rushVersion from rush.json? |
5.179.0 |
pnpmVersion, npmVersion, or yarnVersion from rush.json? |
[email protected] |
(if pnpm) useWorkspaces from pnpm-config.json? |
true |
| Operating system? | Linux (WSL2 Ubuntu 24.04) |
| Would you consider contributing a PR? | Yes |
Node.js version (node -v)? |
22.23.2 |
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- TypeScript
- Sterne
- 6.5k
- Forks
- 708
- Ø Merge
- 2 T. 1 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 46
Entwicklungsumgebung
Die Einrichtungsdateien dieses Projekts haben wir noch nicht geprüft. Beginnen Sie mit der README; die allgemeinen Schritte stehen in unserem Leitfaden für den ersten Beitrag.
Erste Schritte
- Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
- Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Mehr aus microsoft/rushstack
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 72/100
microsoft/rushstack#5971 · 2 Kommentare ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 65/100
microsoft/rushstack#5902 · 1 Reaktion ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 68/100
microsoft/rushstack#5839 · 1 Reaktion ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 70/100
microsoft/rushstack#5683 · 3 Kommentare ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 4/5 3-5 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 45/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
Alle Issues in microsoft/rushstack
Ähnliche Issues
-
needs:triage
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 84/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
ai-discovered
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 83/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 88/100
jessepollak/home#1627 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
agent-canvas bug llm priority:low ready-for-dev
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 82/100
OpenHands/OpenHands#17806 · 3 Kommentare ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
bug
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 76/100
radius-project/ai-extensions#923 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag