[rush] rushd: every warm request re-fingerprints the whole workspace (sync file walk, ajv schema recompiles, sync `ps` spawns on the daemon event loop)
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 45/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- nodejs, typescript
- Área
- performance, tooling
Línea de trabajo
Start by examining the files mentioned: WorkspaceInputFingerprint.ts (lines 62-99, 221-241) for the synchronous file walk and hashing, and LockFile for the ps spawn. Look at how WorkspaceRuntimeFingerprintCache is used and where ajv schema compilation occurs (JsonSchema.ensureCompiled). Profile the daemon with --cpu-prof to see the bottlenecks in action. The fix involves memoizing file stats, caching compiled schemas, and replacing synchronous calls with async or procfs reads. Testing requires a multi-project rush workspace to measure warm request latency before and after changes.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Summary
Most of the daemon-side time for every warm request (tier-0 reuse path) goes to re-fingerprinting the whole workspace from scratch, before anything is scheduled. The cost grows with repo size, and part of the work is synchronous, so it blocks the event loop that serves all clients. After client startup (#6054) is fixed, this becomes the dominant fixed cost of a warm daemon request.
| workspace | captureWorkspaceInputFingerprintAsync (warm median) |
captureProjectConfigurationFingerprintAsync (median) |
sync runtime _hashPaths |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30-project synthetic | 61 ms | 22 ms | 22-27 ms |
| rushstack (196 projects) | 263 ms | 372 ms | 23 ms |
Fully warm no-op latency vs graph size (synthetic): 1.26 s at 1 project, 2.84 s at 50, 8.67 s at 300. That is about 25 ms per project, bound by re-validation. A daemon CPU profile over 12 warm requests in a 30-project workspace shows:
- lstat 466 ms and realpath 263 ms (from
_hashPaths/hashFilesAsync); - ajv schema compilation 530 ms (
JsonSchema.ensureCompiledvia heft-config-file: uncached project config loads recompile the schemas); LockFile.tryAcquire -> getProcessStartTime -> spawnSync('ps')353 ms, about 30-54 ms per call. It runs on every request (acquireExecutionLeaseAsync), in warm-set maintenance, and in#prepareAsync.
As a result, the daemon event loop stalls for up to 190-260 ms (p99) while preparing warm requests, delaying every other client.
Repro steps
Call the same rush-lib functions that WorkspaceRequestLifecycle calls on the tier-0 path (#captureAsync at WorkspaceRequestLifecycle.ts:373 and captureProjectConfigurationFingerprintAsync at :384), with a persistent WorkspaceRuntimeFingerprintCache, 10 times against a 30-project and a 196-project workspace. Or profile the daemon (--cpu-prof) during repeated warm no-op rush-client build requests.
Expected result: Warm requests do incremental work proportional to what changed: stat-identity memoization of definition files, cached compiled schemas, and cached runtime fingerprints. Nothing synchronous or subprocess-based sits on the daemon event loop per request.
Actual result: Full recomputation on every request, with a synchronous file walk, schema recompiles, and a synchronous ps spawn.
Details
Root cause (main @ 60007c9a8c):
libraries/rush-lib/src/api/WorkspaceInputFingerprint.ts:62-99(_hashPaths): a synchronous recursive readdir plusstatSync/realpathSyncof the ~500+ runtime files on every capture.:221-241(hashFilesAsync): re-reads and re-hashes every definition file (rush.json, common/config/**, 4 files per project) with concurrency 3, with no stat memo.:199-215(captureProjectConfigurationFingerprintAsync): uncached project configuration loads recompile ajv schemas.LockFilegetProcessStartTimespawnspssynchronously. On Linux, read/proc/<pid>/statinstead.
Suggested fix: memoize by file identity (dev/ino/size/mtime/ctime), making hashes a cheap stat check; cache compiled schemas process-wide; compute the runtime fingerprint once per process, since runtime files cannot change without a restart; replace the synchronous ps with procfs; and move the remaining synchronous I/O off the event loop.
This was found during an automated performance/behavior analysis of rush-client/rushd on Linux and independently confirmed.
Standard questions
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
@microsoft/rush globally installed version? |
built from main @ 60007c9a8c (5.179.0) |
rushVersion from rush.json? |
5.179.0 |
pnpmVersion, npmVersion, or yarnVersion from rush.json? |
[email protected] |
(if pnpm) useWorkspaces from pnpm-config.json? |
true |
| Operating system? | Linux (WSL2 Ubuntu 24.04) |
| Would you consider contributing a PR? | Yes |
Node.js version (node -v)? |
22.23.2 |
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 6.5k
- Forks
- 708
- Merge medio
- 4 d 7 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 61
Preparar el entorno
Aún no hemos revisado los archivos de configuración de este proyecto. Empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de microsoft/rushstack
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
microsoft/rushstack#5971 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
microsoft/rushstack#5902 · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
microsoft/rushstack#5839 · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
microsoft/rushstack#5683 · 3 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de microsoft/rushstack
Issues similares
-
Resources: New palettes of MacaoAbiertoresources
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
railmapgen/rmg-palette#2445 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
danielmiessler/LifeOS#2242 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 5 días
-
good first issue hacktoberfest help wanted translation
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
callstackincubator/appduct#129 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100