fix(session-flow): stop handoffs from dropping in-force rules to fit the hot-file size cap
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
Bewertung
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 34/100
Rechercherichtung
Start by reading save_point.py validate and the session-flow plugin’s structure.md Shape 3 rules; the issue does not give their paths or identify the relevant tests. Add coverage for a dropped rule and a retired rule, separate core from non-core size in validation, and report when carried Prior sessions content causes the cap to be exceeded. The amendment carry-forward policy is an owner design decision, so completion also needs an agreed policy and a test for it.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Beschreibung
Problem
A shape-3 handoff's hot file has a 24,600-byte cap, but its core (Original goal, Direction changes, Resumption brief, Current rules, Standing preferences) grows every hop and is the part validate says never moves. When the core nears the cap, the only lever left to a writer is the rule list, so in-force rules get dropped from the hot file to pass validate, and the next session never sees them. Nothing in save_point.py validate catches a dropped rule: it reads only size, order and slots.
Evidence (lane 3 chain 20261101T025745Z-handoff-lane3-plan-b, hop 28, 2026-11-06):
- The hot file's core was 24,437 bytes with the cap at 24,600, leaving 163 bytes for every non-core section; the predecessor hop was already over the cap (26,460 bytes, core 21,782).
- The Original goal alone was 13,269 bytes: it carries every dated owner amendment verbatim, and the chain has 28 hops.
- To pass, the writer moved 20 in-force rules into the hop file (among them R77, wait for the hub's OUTAGE-END before GitHub writes; R58, limits on hand re-runs; R68 and R69, safe idle claiming). A side agent caught it; the rules were put back and the file emitted UNVALIDATED at 29,053 bytes (core 23,796).
structure.md"Shape 3" allows deleting a rule only when it is retired, not to fit the cap, but the skill gives no check that enforces it.
Done when
-
save_point.py validatefails when a rule id in the predecessor's Current rules is missing from the hot file and is not listed with a reason under a retired-rules heading in this hop's file (test: drop one rule, see FAIL; list it as retired, see PASS). - The core over the cap is never resolved by moving core content: the skill and
validate's FAIL text say to emit UNVALIDATED (as it already does for a core over the cap) rather than shorten the core, andvalidatenames the core size separately from the non-core size. - The Original goal stops growing without bound: a decided rule for how dated amendments past a threshold are carried (for example, the newest N verbatim in the hot file and the rest verbatim in the hop file with a pointer), with a test.
- A handoff over the cap because of carried deterministic content (the Prior sessions table) is reported as such, so the writer is not pushed to cut written sections.
Notes
The amendment rule touches what "verbatim Original goal" means, so its shape is a design choice for the session-flow plugin's owner; the rule-drop check and the FAIL text are not.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Shell
- Sterne
- 22
- Forks
- 2
- Ø Merge
- 53 Min.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 961
Entwicklungsumgebung
- Kein Dockerfile und keine Docker-Compose-Datei
- Keine Pull-Request-Vorlage
- Beitragsleitfaden lesen
Erste Schritte
- Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
- Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Mehr aus melodic-software/claude-code-plugins
-
status: ready
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 68/100
melodic-software/claude-code-plugins#14389 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 72/100
melodic-software/claude-code-plugins#14369 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 68/100
melodic-software/claude-code-plugins#14330 · 6 Kommentare ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
status: ready
Schwierigkeit 4/5 3-5 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 55/100
melodic-software/claude-code-plugins#14388 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 4/5 3-5 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 48/100
melodic-software/claude-code-plugins#14387 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
Alle Issues in melodic-software/claude-code-plugins
Ähnliche Issues
-
S3: friction & debt
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 72/100
MedakaLang/medaka#5010 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
area:ci good first issue priority:p2 type:test
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
follow-up
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
carrick-sh/carrick#1963 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 72/100
-
Schwierigkeit 1/5 Unter einer Stunde Anfängerfreundlichkeit 65/100
community-scripts/ProxmoxVE#18546 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag