Java: Detecting flow through throw - catch statements
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
Bewertung
- Schwierigkeit
- 4/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 3-5 Tage
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 30/100
Rechercherichtung
Beginnen Sie mit qlpack.yml und codeql-pack.lock.yml und untersuchen Sie anschließend die Einstiegspunkte isSource, isSink und isAdditionalFlowStep der Query anhand des toy Java example. Führen Sie die Query mit der angegebenen CLI-Version aus und überprüfen Sie, ob der throw-to-catch-Datenfluss erkannt wird; abgeschlossen ist die Untersuchung, wenn die Abhängigkeit oder das Verhalten der Query identifiziert wurde, die bzw. das für den fehlenden Datenfluss verantwortlich ist.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Beschreibung
Hello,
I'm having a confusing issue trying to track the data flow from a throw to a catch statement. I had similar queries working just fine. However, I was messing around with my qlpack last week and I think I may have messed something up. To give you some context, I am using CLI version 2.20.3 and here is my
qlpack.yml
---
library: false
warnOnImplicitThis: false
name: custom-codeql-queries
version: 0.0.1
dependencies:
# codeql/java-queries: ^0.8.9
codeql/java-all: 6.1.0
libraries:
- name: SensitiveInfo
path: /SensitiveInfo
dataExtensions:
- SensitiveInfo/*.yml
Along with my codeql-pack.lock.yml
---
lockVersion: 1.0.0
dependencies:
codeql/dataflow:
version: 1.1.9
codeql/java-all:
version: 6.1.0
codeql/mad:
version: 1.0.15
codeql/rangeanalysis:
version: 1.0.15
codeql/regex:
version: 1.0.15
codeql/ssa:
version: 1.0.15
codeql/threat-models:
version: 1.0.15
codeql/tutorial:
version: 1.0.15
codeql/typeflow:
version: 1.0.15
codeql/typetracking:
version: 1.0.15
codeql/util:
version: 2.0.2
codeql/xml:
version: 1.0.15
compiled: false
I don't fully understand all of the dependency versions needed to work with my CLI version so I would appriacte it if someones could point out if this looks wrong.
On to my specific issue.
I am trying to detect this toy example.
import javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet;
import javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest;
import javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse;
import javax.ejb.EJBException;
import java.io.IOException;
public class BAD_AuthenticationFailureServlet extends HttpServlet {
@Override
protected void doGet(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) throws IOException {
String username = request.getParameter("username");
String password = request.getParameter("password");
try {
authenticateUser(username, password);
} catch (EJBException e) {
response.getWriter().write("Authentication failed: " + e.getMessage());
}
}
private void authenticateUser(String username, String password) throws EJBException {
if (username == null || password == null) {
throw new EJBException("Username or password is null. Provided username: " + username + ", password: " + password);
}
throw new EJBException("Invalid credentials provided for user " + username + ". Attempted password: " + password);
}
}
With this query
/**
* @name CWE-550: Exposure of sensitive information through servlet responses
* @description Detects flows of the `password` parameter into EJBException messages that are written back to HTTP clients.
* @kind path-problem
* @problem.severity warning
* @id java/servlet-info-exposure/550
* @tags security
* external/cwe/cwe-550
* external/cwe/cwe-200
* @cwe CWE-550
*/
import java
import semmle.code.java.dataflow.TaintTracking
import semmle.code.java.dataflow.DataFlow
// Define flow states
private newtype MyFlowState =
State1() or
State2() or
State3()
module ServerGeneratedErrorMessageConfig implements DataFlow::StateConfigSig {
class FlowState = MyFlowState;
// Source: the `password` servlet parameter
predicate isSource(DataFlow::Node source, FlowState state) {
state instanceof State1 and
exists(VarAccess va |
va.getVariable().getName() = "password" and
source.asExpr() = va
)
}
// Sink: explicit HTTP response sinks that expose the message
predicate isSink(DataFlow::Node sink, FlowState state) {
state instanceof State3 and (
// response.getWriter().write(msg)
exists(MethodCall mc |
mc.getMethod().getName() = "write" and
exists(MethodCall getWriter |
getWriter.getMethod().getName() = "getWriter" and
getWriter = mc.getQualifier() and
getWriter.getQualifier().getType().(RefType).hasQualifiedName("javax.servlet.http", "HttpServletResponse")
) and
mc.getArgument(0) = sink.asExpr()
)
)
}
// Transitions between flow states
predicate isAdditionalFlowStep(
DataFlow::Node node1, FlowState state1,
DataFlow::Node node2, FlowState state2
) {
// State1->State2: flows into EJBException constructor
state1 instanceof State1 and state2 instanceof State2 and
exists(ConstructorCall cc |
cc.getAnArgument() = node1.asExpr() and
cc.getConstructor().getDeclaringType().(RefType)
.getASupertype+().hasQualifiedName("javax.ejb", "EJBException") and
node2.asExpr() = cc
)
or
// State2->State3: flows from throw to catch capturing e or e.getMessage()
state1 instanceof State2 and state2 instanceof State3 and
exists(ThrowStmt t, CatchClause cc, Expr use |
t.getExpr() = node1.asExpr() and
cc.getEnclosingCallable() = t.getEnclosingCallable() and
(
use = cc.getVariable().getAnAccess()
or
exists(MethodCall mc2 |
mc2.getQualifier() = cc.getVariable().getAnAccess() and
mc2.getMethod().getName() = "getMessage" and
use = mc2
)
) and
node2.asExpr() = use
)
}
}
module SensitiveInfoInErrorMsgFlow =
TaintTracking::GlobalWithState<ServerGeneratedErrorMessageConfig>;
import SensitiveInfoInErrorMsgFlow::PathGraph
from SensitiveInfoInErrorMsgFlow::PathNode source, SensitiveInfoInErrorMsgFlow::PathNode sink
where SensitiveInfoInErrorMsgFlow::flowPath(source, sink)
select sink, source, sink,
"CWE-550: password parameter is exposed via server error message."
I have confirmed that the isSource and isSink do work. So the issue is likely in the flow between them. I have used a few queries in the past that follow this similar structure. However, they are also missing some cases randomly at the moment. Which is leading me to believe it has something to do with my qlpack.
As always, thank you for the help.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- CodeQL
- Sterne
- 10.1k
- Forks
- 2.1k
- Ø Merge
- 2 T. 16 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 143
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
- Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Mehr aus github/codeql
-
agentic-workflows
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 70/100
-
false-positive javascript
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 84/100
-
C#: cs/simplifiable-boolean-expression false positive on Nullable<bool> compared with a literal Offen
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 82/100
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
-
false-positive
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 70/100
Ähnliche Issues
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 75/100
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 75/100
nightscout/nocturne#1424 ·
-
A claim comment carrying the issue number is silently declined while the workflow reports success Offenarea: repo bug perceived difficulty: 2
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 70/100
-
impl detach for native Offen
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 65/100
paritytech/zombienet-sdk#591 ·
-
bug
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 75/100
mruangutai/harness#1897 ·