Hacktoberfest 2026: die Issues, die Maintainer für den Oktober markiert haben – offen und einsteigerfreundlich. Hacktoberfest-Issues durchsuchen

Server builder assets can overwrite the generated main.js entry point

Offen
#34,195 0 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

Bewertung

Schwierigkeit
3/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
1-2 Tage
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
68/100
Issue-Typ
Bug
Klarheit
Größtenteils klar
Aktivitätsstatus
Aktiv
Tech-Stack
angular, typescript

Rechercherichtung

Start with packages/angular_devkit/build_angular/src/builders/server/index.ts, especially the call to copyAssets(), then read packages/angular_devkit/build_angular/src/utils/copy-assets.ts to trace destination writes. Run scripts/validate.sh in the linked reproduction to confirm the collision. Done means the server builder no longer allows an asset to replace generated main.js and the clean and attack scenarios behave as intended.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Beschreibung

area: @angular-devkit/build-angular gemini-triaged
Command

build, run

Is this a regression?

No. The server builder has copied configured assets after Webpack output since the assets option was released in 15.1.0.

The previous version in which this bug was not present was

No response.

Description

@angular-devkit/build-angular:server copies configured assets after Webpack emits the server program, without checking whether an asset destination is already a generated file.

With a recursive asset tree copied to output ., an asset named main.js silently replaces the generated server entry point. The build reports success, and normal node dist/server/main.js startup executes the asset instead of the generated application bundle.

I reproduced this with an asset-only dependency update. Version 1.0.0 contains only assets/data.json; version 1.0.1 adds only assets/main.js. Neither version declares scripts, main, exports, imports, or bin, installation uses --ignore-scripts, and the application never imports the package.

Expected: the build should reject an asset/generated-output collision, or keep generated output authoritative.

Actual: the build succeeds and the final dist/server/main.js is byte-for-byte identical to the dependency asset. Starting it executes dependency-controlled code as the deployed server process.

Minimal Reproduction

Repository: https://github.com/BlueIridium-Security/angular-server-asset-entry-collision-repro

git clone https://github.com/BlueIridium-Security/angular-server-asset-entry-collision-repro.git
cd angular-server-asset-entry-collision-repro
./scripts/validate.sh

The validator runs clean → attack → restored-clean → restored-attack. Across two fresh-container runs, clean 1.0.0 always emitted and started the same genuine 782,472-byte bundle with no marker; attack 1.0.1 always emitted the exact 192-byte package asset and executed its marker. Runtime networking is disabled, and the script fails on any control mismatch.

Exception or Error

No exception is reported. The builder reports successful bundle generation and asset copying.

Your Environment
Angular CLI: 22.2.0
@angular-devkit/build-angular: 22.2.0
Angular: 22.2.0
Node: 24.21.0
npm: 11.19.0
OS: Linux arm64 container (node:24.21.0-bookworm-slim)
Anything else relevant?

The builder is deprecated but remains shipped. The default server assets list is empty, and exploitation requires an opt-in recursive root-output rule plus an accepted package update, build, deployment, and startup. I therefore assess this as High rather than Critical.

Current source shows the server builder calling copyAssets() after successful Webpack output, while copyAssets() writes each destination without checking generated outputs.

This is distinct from #19157 and #16670, which discuss precedence between two configured asset inputs rather than a post-Webpack asset replacing the executable generated entry point.

Should the server builder reject configured asset destinations that collide with generated output files?

Vorherrschende Sprache
TypeScript
Sterne
27k
Forks
11.8k
Ø Merge
21 Std. 32 Min.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
162

Entwicklungsumgebung

Erste Schritte

  1. Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
  4. Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Mehr aus angular/angular-cli

Alle Issues in angular/angular-cli

Ähnliche Issues

Weitere Issues zu TypeScript

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.