Hacktoberfest 2026: die Issues, die Maintainer für den Oktober markiert haben – offen und einsteigerfreundlich. Hacktoberfest-Issues durchsuchen

OfflineExecutor.dispose() never settles pendingTransactionPromises

Offen Anfängerfreundlich
#2,254 1 Kommentar 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag

@Claire-ovo arbeitet bereits daran.

Seit 26.10.2026.

Bewertung

Schwierigkeit
2/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
1-3 Stunden
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
78/100
Issue-Typ
Bug
Klarheit
Klar beschrieben
Aktivitätsstatus
Aktiv
Tech-Stack
node.js, typescript
Bereich
backend, databases

Rechercherichtung

Beginne mit packages/offline-transactions/src/OfflineExecutor.ts, insbesondere mit waitForTransactionCompletion, resolveTransaction/rejectTransaction und dispose(), wie im Issue verlinkt. Verfolge, wie ausstehende Deferreds den Transaktionen zugeordnet sind, und prüfe die Disposal- und Transaktionstests des Pakets. Reproduziere die im Issue beschriebene Abfolge aus Offline-Commit, Disposal und Replay; als abgeschlossen gilt die Aufgabe, wenn die ursprüngliche Transaktion einen abgeschlossenen Zustand erreicht und ihr isPersisted.promise nicht mehr hängen bleibt.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Beschreibung

  • I've validated the bug against the latest version of DB packages

Describe the bug
OfflineExecutor keeps a pendingTransactionPromises map of deferreds, created by waitForTransactionCompletion and settled by resolveTransaction / rejectTransaction. dispose() pauses the executor and tears down the collection refresh hooks, the online listener, leadership, and the online detector, but it never touches the map. Every deferred in it is abandoned, so a transaction committed on a disposed executor never leaves persisting, and its isPersisted.promise never settles.

To Reproduce

  1. npm i @tanstack/[email protected] @tanstack/db and save the script below as repro.mjs. It runs in plain Node: in-memory storage stands in for IndexedDB and is shared by both executors, and connectivity and leader election are stubbed.
  2. Start an executor offline and commit a transaction. It persists to the outbox, and the mutation fn does not run.
  3. Call dispose() on that executor and start a successor on the same storage, online.
  4. The successor replays the row, runs the mutation fn once, and empties the outbox.
  5. See that the original transaction still reads persisting and its isPersisted.promise is unsettled (node repro.mjs --dispose). The control run without the dispose resolves (node repro.mjs).
repro.mjs
import { createCollection, localOnlyCollectionOptions } from "@tanstack/db";
import { startOfflineExecutor } from "@tanstack/offline-transactions";

const withDispose = process.argv.includes("--dispose");

// Shared in-memory storage, standing in for IndexedDB across both executors.
const store = new Map();
const storage = {
  get: async (k) => store.get(k) ?? null,
  set: async (k, v) => void store.set(k, v),
  delete: async (k) => void store.delete(k),
  keys: async () => [...store.keys()],
  clear: async () => void store.clear(),
};

// Always-leader election: no Web Locks in Node.
const leaderElection = {
  requestLeadership: async () => true,
  releaseLeadership: () => {},
  isLeader: () => true,
  onLeadershipChange: () => () => {},
};

// Manually toggled connectivity.
function makeDetector(initiallyOnline) {
  let online = initiallyOnline;
  const listeners = new Set();
  return {
    subscribe: (cb) => (listeners.add(cb), () => listeners.delete(cb)),
    notifyOnline: () => listeners.forEach((cb) => cb()),
    isOnline: () => online,
    dispose: () => listeners.clear(),
    goOnline() {
      online = true;
      listeners.forEach((cb) => cb());
    },
  };
}

const todos = createCollection(
  localOnlyCollectionOptions({ id: "todos", getKey: (t) => t.id }),
);

const calls = [];
const mutationFns = {
  syncTodos: async ({ transaction }) => {
    calls.push(transaction.id);
  },
};

const sleep = (ms) => new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, ms));
const settledWithin = (promise, ms) =>
  Promise.race([
    promise.then(
      () => "resolved",
      (e) => `rejected: ${e?.message}`,
    ),
    sleep(ms).then(() => "STILL PENDING"),
  ]);

// 1. Start offline and commit a transaction; it persists to the outbox.
const detector1 = makeDetector(false);
const executor1 = startOfflineExecutor({
  collections: { todos },
  mutationFns,
  storage,
  leaderElection,
  onlineDetector: detector1,
});
await executor1.waitForInit();

const tx = executor1.createOfflineTransaction({ mutationFnName: "syncTodos" });
// autoCommit defaults to true, so mutate() commits.
const transaction = tx.mutate(() => todos.insert({ id: "1", text: "hello" }));
const isPersisted = transaction.isPersisted.promise;
await sleep(100);
console.log("outbox rows after offline commit:", store.size);
console.log("mutationFn calls while offline:", calls.length);

let completer;
if (withDispose) {
  // 2. Dispose (the recreate pattern) and start a successor on the same storage.
  executor1.dispose();
  const detector2 = makeDetector(true);
  completer = startOfflineExecutor({
    collections: { todos },
    mutationFns,
    storage,
    leaderElection,
    onlineDetector: detector2,
  });
  await completer.waitForInit();
} else {
  // Control: no dispose, just come back online on the same executor.
  detector1.goOnline();
  completer = executor1;
}

// 3. Let the outbox drain.
await sleep(500);
console.log("mutationFn calls after replay:", calls.length);
console.log("outbox rows after replay:", store.size);
console.log("pending count on completing executor:", completer.getPendingCount());

// 4. The promises the first executor handed out.
console.log("transaction.state:", transaction.state);
console.log("isPersisted.promise:", await settledWithin(isPersisted, 2000));
process.exit(0);

Output:

== node repro.mjs  (control: no dispose)
outbox rows after offline commit: 1
mutationFn calls while offline: 0
mutationFn calls after replay: 1
outbox rows after replay: 0
pending count on completing executor: 0
transaction.state: completed
isPersisted.promise: resolved

== node repro.mjs --dispose
outbox rows after offline commit: 1
mutationFn calls while offline: 0
mutationFn calls after replay: 1
outbox rows after replay: 0
pending count on completing executor: 0
transaction.state: persisting
isPersisted.promise: STILL PENDING

Expected behavior
dispose() settles every deferred in pendingTransactionPromises, so no caller is left awaiting a transaction from a disposed executor. Either of these would work:

  • Reject each deferred with a disposal error the caller can treat as retriable.
  • Expose the pending ids so a successor executor can re-bridge them, and resolve them when it completes the replayed transaction.

Screenshots
N/A. The repro's console output is above.

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: Linux (kernel 6.18)
  • Browser: N/A. Reproduced in Node v24.22.1. The executor code path is environment-independent.
  • Version: @tanstack/offline-transactions 1.1.4, @tanstack/db 0.15.2. dispose() is unchanged on main at d2935d0.

Smartphone (please complete the following information):

  • N/A

Additional context
I first hit this on 1.0.42 in an app whose outbox recreates its executor whenever a new collection registers. I work around it with a completion ledger that carries isPersisted settlement across the recreate, but an upstream fix would let me delete this workaround.

Vorherrschende Sprache
TypeScript
Sterne
4k
Forks
277
Ø Merge
21 Std. 21 Min.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
218

Entwicklungsumgebung

Erste Schritte

  1. Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
  4. Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Mehr aus TanStack/db

Alle Issues in TanStack/db

Ähnliche Issues

Weitere Issues zu TypeScript

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.