Vendored Maven reactor ignores profile <properties>, so a version an active profile raises is silently downgraded to the patched base (1.11.0 → 1.10.0-socket.*) with exit 0 and no warning
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
Bewertung
- Schwierigkeit
- 4/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 3-5 Tage
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 65/100
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Klarheit
- Klar beschrieben
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Aktiv
- Tech-Stack
- rust
- Bereich
- build-system, devtools
Rechercherichtung
Start in crates/socket-patch-core/src/vendor/jvm/maven_reactor.rs at lines 711-742, 930-948, and 1020-1036, then run the e2e_vendor_jvm_build harness with the profile-based reactor from the issue. Trace how profile properties are resolved and how overridden declarations are handled. Done means the profile-driven version is not silently rewritten or pinned, and the expected conflict warning is produced.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Beschreibung
[agent] Found by the scheduled Maven bug-hunt routine (ledger #318).
Summary
The v5 Maven reactor backend (vendor, scan/get --mode vendored) resolves ${property} dependency versions from top-level <properties> only (maven_reactor.rs:711: "Top-level <properties> (profiles excluded)"). Suppose a module declares <version>${ct.version}</version>, the parent sets ct.version=1.10.0, and an active profile (activeByDefault, <jdk>[11,)</jdk>, a property activation…) overrides it to 1.11.0. Maven builds 1.11.0. The planner instead sees 1.10.0, matches the patch base, and replaces ${ct.version} with the literal 1.10.0-socket.<hex8>. It also adds a dependency-management pin in the local root.
After vendoring, the build silently moves from commons-text 1.11.0 down to 1.10.0-socket.1d3c1fd2. vendor exits 0 with applied: 1 and gives no warning about the profile, and VEX then attests not_affected for 1.10.0.
Impact
- vendoring silently changes the version a profile-driven build links, here a downgrade. Profile-switched library versions (by JDK or by an activation property) are a common pattern.
- The profile's override goes dead because the literal replaces the
${ct.version}reference. - The equivalent non-profile case is already handled. When a module overrides the inherited property in its own top-level
<properties>, the planner emitsconflicting_literal_versionand leaves the root unpinned (inherited_property_overridden_by_a_module_is_left_alone). The profile variant takes the silent path instead.
Expected vs actual
- Expected (docs/design/maven-vendoring.md, "Maven"): "Rewrites of conflicting base-version literals and resolved local properties, including profiles … conflicting explicit versions … produce specific warnings; the backend does not silently claim those unsupported declarations are patched." A property that an active, or possibly active, profile resolves to something other than the patch base should be treated like the module-override case: warn
conflicting_literal_version(or a profile-specific code) and leave the declaration alone. The planner shouldn't rewrite it to the suffixed base. - Actual:
${ct.version}is rewritten to1.10.0-socket.1d3c1fd2and the local root gets a pin. Exit 0, no warning, and the build resolves the suffixed 1.10.0 instead of 1.11.0.
Repro
Reactor (aggregator → corp-parent, a):
<!-- corp-parent/pom.xml -->
<properties><ct.version>1.10.0</ct.version></properties>
<!-- a/pom.xml (parent = corp-parent) -->
<profiles>
<profile>
<id>modern-jdk</id>
<activation><activeByDefault>true</activeByDefault></activation> <!-- or <jdk>[11,)</jdk> -->
<properties><ct.version>1.11.0</ct.version></properties>
</profile>
</profiles>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.commons</groupId>
<artifactId>commons-text</artifactId>
<version>${ct.version}</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
Steps: the repo's e2e_vendor_jvm_build harness (prebuilt patch-service mock, staged manifest for pkg:maven/org.apache.commons/[email protected]), with this reactor in place of write_reactor:
mvn package dependency:3.5.0:build-classpath -Dmdep.outputFile=target/cp.txt
# a → ~/.m2/.../commons-text/1.11.0/commons-text-1.11.0.jar
socket-patch vendor --json --offline
# exit 0, status success, applied 1; only maven_f_outside_root / maven_mirror_of_all degraded notes
# a/pom.xml: <version>${ct.version}</version> → <version>1.10.0-socket.1d3c1fd2</version>
# corp-parent/pom.xml: + dependencyManagement pin 1.10.0-socket.1d3c1fd2 + socket-patch-vendor repo
mvn package dependency:3.5.0:build-classpath -Dmdep.outputFile=target/cp.txt
# a → .socket/vendor/maven2/.../1.10.0-socket.1d3c1fd2/commons-text-1.10.0-socket.1d3c1fd2.jar
socket-patch vex --offline -O vex.json
# exit 0, [email protected] not_affected
OS × version
| OS | Maven | JDK | Activation | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | 3.9.11 | 21 | <jdk>[11,)</jdk> |
reproduces (silent 1.11.0 → 1.10.0-socket) |
| Linux | 3.9.11 | 21 | activeByDefault |
reproduces |
| Linux | 4.0.0-rc-7 | 21 | activeByDefault |
reproduces |
| Linux | 3.6.3 / 3.8.8 | 21 | – | blocked (Maven Central 429 during fixture warm-up) |
| macOS / Windows | – | – | – | untested. The planner is pure text logic, so no OS dependence is expected |
Tested on main 2463257 (v5 consolidation #277). This isn't a regression: the reactor backend is new in v5.
Suspect code
crates/socket-patch-core/src/vendor/jvm/maven_reactor.rs:711-742:Pom::parsecollects onlyproject/properties.crates/socket-patch-core/src/vendor/jvm/maven_reactor.rs:930-948:Reactor::lookupnever consults profile properties.crates/socket-patch-core/src/vendor/jvm/maven_reactor.rs:1020-1036: theoverriddencheck only looks at inheritors' top-level properties, so a profile override in the declaring pom, or in any pom on its chain, doesn't trip it.
A possible fix: when any profile on the chain (including the declaring pom) defines the property with a value that isn't base-like, take the conflicting_literal_version path, because activation can't be evaluated statically.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Rust
- Sterne
- 8
- Forks
- 0
- Ø Merge
- 18 Std. 4 Min.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 70
Entwicklungsumgebung
- Kein Dockerfile und keine Docker-Compose-Datei
- Keine Pull-Request-Vorlage
- Beitragsleitfaden lesen
Erste Schritte
- Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
- Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Mehr aus SocketDev/socket-patch
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:composer priority:p2
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 90/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#515 · 1 Kommentar ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:npm priority:p1
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 82/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#464 · 1 Kommentar ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:npm priority:p1
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 82/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#433 · 1 Kommentar ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:uv priority:p1
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#408 · 1 Kommentar ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:yarn-berry priority:p1
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 82/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#370 · 2 Kommentare ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
Alle Issues in SocketDev/socket-patch
Ähnliche Issues
-
discover: `sudo RTK_DISABLED=$VAR …` is not detected as a bypass when `sudo` is a transparent prefixOffenarea:cli bug good first issue priority:medium
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 88/100
rtk-ai/rtk#4412 · 1 Kommentar ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
skill:code-review
Schwierigkeit 1/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 88/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
component:sight
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 84/100
agentic-os-org/ANOLISA#4115 · 1 Kommentar ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
rivet-dev/rivet#5819 · 1 Kommentar ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
A-io-database bug needs triage python
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 86/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag