Vendored Maven reactor ignores profile <properties>, so a version an active profile raises is silently downgraded to the patched base (1.11.0 → 1.10.0-socket.*) with exit 0 and no warning
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 65/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- rust
- Área
- build-system, devtools
Línea de trabajo
Start in crates/socket-patch-core/src/vendor/jvm/maven_reactor.rs at lines 711-742, 930-948, and 1020-1036, then run the e2e_vendor_jvm_build harness with the profile-based reactor from the issue. Trace how profile properties are resolved and how overridden declarations are handled. Done means the profile-driven version is not silently rewritten or pinned, and the expected conflict warning is produced.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
[agent] Found by the scheduled Maven bug-hunt routine (ledger #318).
Summary
The v5 Maven reactor backend (vendor, scan/get --mode vendored) resolves ${property} dependency versions from top-level <properties> only (maven_reactor.rs:711: "Top-level <properties> (profiles excluded)"). Suppose a module declares <version>${ct.version}</version>, the parent sets ct.version=1.10.0, and an active profile (activeByDefault, <jdk>[11,)</jdk>, a property activation…) overrides it to 1.11.0. Maven builds 1.11.0. The planner instead sees 1.10.0, matches the patch base, and replaces ${ct.version} with the literal 1.10.0-socket.<hex8>. It also adds a dependency-management pin in the local root.
After vendoring, the build silently moves from commons-text 1.11.0 down to 1.10.0-socket.1d3c1fd2. vendor exits 0 with applied: 1 and gives no warning about the profile, and VEX then attests not_affected for 1.10.0.
Impact
- vendoring silently changes the version a profile-driven build links, here a downgrade. Profile-switched library versions (by JDK or by an activation property) are a common pattern.
- The profile's override goes dead because the literal replaces the
${ct.version}reference. - The equivalent non-profile case is already handled. When a module overrides the inherited property in its own top-level
<properties>, the planner emitsconflicting_literal_versionand leaves the root unpinned (inherited_property_overridden_by_a_module_is_left_alone). The profile variant takes the silent path instead.
Expected vs actual
- Expected (docs/design/maven-vendoring.md, "Maven"): "Rewrites of conflicting base-version literals and resolved local properties, including profiles … conflicting explicit versions … produce specific warnings; the backend does not silently claim those unsupported declarations are patched." A property that an active, or possibly active, profile resolves to something other than the patch base should be treated like the module-override case: warn
conflicting_literal_version(or a profile-specific code) and leave the declaration alone. The planner shouldn't rewrite it to the suffixed base. - Actual:
${ct.version}is rewritten to1.10.0-socket.1d3c1fd2and the local root gets a pin. Exit 0, no warning, and the build resolves the suffixed 1.10.0 instead of 1.11.0.
Repro
Reactor (aggregator → corp-parent, a):
<!-- corp-parent/pom.xml -->
<properties><ct.version>1.10.0</ct.version></properties>
<!-- a/pom.xml (parent = corp-parent) -->
<profiles>
<profile>
<id>modern-jdk</id>
<activation><activeByDefault>true</activeByDefault></activation> <!-- or <jdk>[11,)</jdk> -->
<properties><ct.version>1.11.0</ct.version></properties>
</profile>
</profiles>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.commons</groupId>
<artifactId>commons-text</artifactId>
<version>${ct.version}</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
Steps: the repo's e2e_vendor_jvm_build harness (prebuilt patch-service mock, staged manifest for pkg:maven/org.apache.commons/[email protected]), with this reactor in place of write_reactor:
mvn package dependency:3.5.0:build-classpath -Dmdep.outputFile=target/cp.txt
# a → ~/.m2/.../commons-text/1.11.0/commons-text-1.11.0.jar
socket-patch vendor --json --offline
# exit 0, status success, applied 1; only maven_f_outside_root / maven_mirror_of_all degraded notes
# a/pom.xml: <version>${ct.version}</version> → <version>1.10.0-socket.1d3c1fd2</version>
# corp-parent/pom.xml: + dependencyManagement pin 1.10.0-socket.1d3c1fd2 + socket-patch-vendor repo
mvn package dependency:3.5.0:build-classpath -Dmdep.outputFile=target/cp.txt
# a → .socket/vendor/maven2/.../1.10.0-socket.1d3c1fd2/commons-text-1.10.0-socket.1d3c1fd2.jar
socket-patch vex --offline -O vex.json
# exit 0, [email protected] not_affected
OS × version
| OS | Maven | JDK | Activation | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | 3.9.11 | 21 | <jdk>[11,)</jdk> |
reproduces (silent 1.11.0 → 1.10.0-socket) |
| Linux | 3.9.11 | 21 | activeByDefault |
reproduces |
| Linux | 4.0.0-rc-7 | 21 | activeByDefault |
reproduces |
| Linux | 3.6.3 / 3.8.8 | 21 | – | blocked (Maven Central 429 during fixture warm-up) |
| macOS / Windows | – | – | – | untested. The planner is pure text logic, so no OS dependence is expected |
Tested on main 2463257 (v5 consolidation #277). This isn't a regression: the reactor backend is new in v5.
Suspect code
crates/socket-patch-core/src/vendor/jvm/maven_reactor.rs:711-742:Pom::parsecollects onlyproject/properties.crates/socket-patch-core/src/vendor/jvm/maven_reactor.rs:930-948:Reactor::lookupnever consults profile properties.crates/socket-patch-core/src/vendor/jvm/maven_reactor.rs:1020-1036: theoverriddencheck only looks at inheritors' top-level properties, so a profile override in the declaring pom, or in any pom on its chain, doesn't trip it.
A possible fix: when any profile on the chain (including the declaring pom) defines the property with a value that isn't base-like, take the conflicting_literal_version path, because activation can't be evaluated statically.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Rust
- Estrellas
- 8
- Forks
- 0
- Merge medio
- 1 d 7 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 178
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de SocketDev/socket-patch
-
Hosted yarn classic pins give no berry-migration warning, so a yarn 2+ install silently drops them (vendored warns about the same trap)Posiblemente ocupada @mikolalysenko la tomó hoy. Abiertoagent:claimed agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:yarn-classic priority:p1
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#907 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:npm priority:p1
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#900 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:bundler priority:p1
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#896 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:yarn-berry priority:p1
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 73/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#783 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:pipenv priority:p1
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 83/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#744 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de SocketDev/socket-patch
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 4 días
-
`future_into_py` loses the original panic messagePosiblemente ocupada @Danipulok la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 90/100
PyO3/pyo3-async-runtimes#91 ·
-
Signals (Failure Detector): a tool call and its own execution are reported as a repeated callAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días