PSET outputs lose their nonce on round trip: `extract_tx` for unblinded outputs, `to_txout` for blinded ones
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
Bewertung
- Schwierigkeit
- 4/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 3-5 Tage
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 52/100
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Aktiv
- Tech-Stack
- rust
- Bereich
- blockchain
Rechercherichtung
Start with the cited conversion code in src/pset/map/output.rs and src/pset/mod.rs, then run the two nonce round-trip tests from the reproduction. Trace how from_txout, Output::to_txout, and extract_tx choose nonce fields, and confirm the intended PSET semantics before changing them. Done means both unblinded and blinded round trips preserve the nonce while missing asset/value errors remain correct.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Beschreibung
While working on Sighashes in SimplicityHL, the LLM picked up this issue. I unfortunately don't know enough of the design to know whether this field was left out on purpose. I've created an issue so long to document the problem.
Summary
A transaction loaded with PartiallySignedTransaction::from_tx doesn't always come back with the
same output nonces. There are two converters from a PSET output back to a TxOut, and each one
drops the nonce in a different case:
Output loaded with from_tx |
extract_tx |
Output::to_txout |
|---|---|---|
| unblinded, with a nonce | nonce lost (Null) |
ok |
| blinded, with a nonce | ok | nonce lost (Null) |
Checked at 582ea613cb. The code is the same in 0.25.3 and 0.26.2.
Cause
Output::from_txout puts the nonce in ecdh_pubkey for a blinded output and in blinding_key
for an unblinded one
(src/pset/map/output.rs#L212-L222):
if txout.is_partially_blinded() {
rv.ecdh_pubkey = txout.nonce.commitment().map(|pk| PublicKey { inner: pk, compressed: true });
} else {
rv.blinding_key = txout.nonce.commitment().map(|pk| PublicKey { inner: pk, compressed: true });
}
PartiallySignedTransaction::extract_tx only reads ecdh_pubkey
(src/pset/mod.rs#L330-L333),
so it misses the unblinded case:
nonce: out
.ecdh_pubkey
.map(|x| confidential::Nonce::from(x.inner))
.unwrap_or_default(),
Output::to_txout picks the field with Output::is_partially_blinded
(src/pset/map/output.rs#L250-L256).
That function requires is_marked_for_blinding(), which means blinding_key.is_some()
(L272-L283).
A blinded output from from_txout has ecdh_pubkey set but no blinding_key, so to_txout takes
the else branch, reads blinding_key, and gets nothing.
Because of this, changing extract_tx to call to_txout as it is now would move the bug to
blinded outputs rather than fix it.
Reproduction
use elements::confidential::{Asset, Nonce, Value};
use elements::pset::PartiallySignedTransaction;
use elements::secp256k1_zkp::{Generator, Keypair, Secp256k1, Tag, Tweak};
use elements::{AssetId, LockTime, Script, Transaction, TxOut, TxOutWitness};
fn tx_with_output(asset: Asset) -> Transaction {
let secp = Secp256k1::new();
let pk = Keypair::from_seckey_slice(&secp, &[1u8; 32]).unwrap().public_key();
Transaction {
version: 2,
lock_time: LockTime::ZERO,
input: vec![],
output: vec![TxOut {
asset,
value: Value::Explicit(1_000),
nonce: Nonce::Confidential(pk),
script_pubkey: Script::new(),
witness: TxOutWitness::default(),
}],
}
}
#[test]
fn unblinded_output_nonce_round_trip() {
let tx = tx_with_output(Asset::Explicit(AssetId::default()));
let pset = PartiallySignedTransaction::from_tx(tx.clone());
assert_eq!(pset.outputs()[0].to_txout().nonce, tx.output[0].nonce); // passes
assert_eq!(pset.extract_tx().unwrap().output[0].nonce, tx.output[0].nonce); // fails: Null
}
#[test]
fn blinded_output_nonce_round_trip() {
let secp = Secp256k1::new();
let asset = Generator::new_blinded(&secp, Tag::from([2u8; 32]), Tweak::from_slice(&[3u8; 32]).unwrap());
let tx = tx_with_output(Asset::Confidential(asset));
let pset = PartiallySignedTransaction::from_tx(tx.clone());
assert_eq!(pset.extract_tx().unwrap().output[0].nonce, tx.output[0].nonce); // passes
assert_eq!(pset.outputs()[0].to_txout().nonce, tx.output[0].nonce); // fails: Null
}
Both tests fail on their second assertion, with left: Null.
Impact
Values, assets and scripts are unaffected. The nonce is part of what signatures commit to (the
taproot sighash's sha_outputs, and Simplicity's outputs_hash). So the txid changes on a round
trip, and a signature made over the original transaction doesn't verify on the extracted one, and
vice versa. As far as I can tell this fails closed, with invalid signatures or a changed txid, and
doesn't put funds at risk.
The extract_tx case needs an unblinded output that carries a nonce, which is unusual. The
to_txout case affects ordinary blinded transactions loaded with from_tx.
Possible fix
Use one rule in both places, for example ecdh_pubkey.or(blinding_key), and have extract_tx build
its outputs with to_txout. extract_tx would still need to return its own errors when the asset
or value is missing. That makes both rows of the table round-trip, and ecdh_pubkey wins whenever
an output has been blinded.
I'm not sure whether this is the intended semantics. Putting an unblinded output's nonce in
blinding_key marks that output for blinding. Under strict PSET rules, extracting it before it has
been blinded might be meant to fail instead. I also haven't checked what Elements Core does here.
The history suggests the inconsistency is accidental: 724a14d changed extract_tx from
blinding_key to ecdh_pubkey, and dc350a0 replaced the ecdh_pubkey.or(blinding_key) rule in
to_txout that e73ee1f had added.
Unrelated, but nearby: extract_tx seems to return swapped errors. It returns
MissingOutputValue when the asset is missing and MissingOutputAsset when the value is missing
(src/pset/mod.rs#L319-L329).
I'm happy to open a PR with the tests and a fix if this direction sounds right.
Related
- #292 fixed a similar round-trip problem for inputs:
extract_txleft the peg-in and issuance
flags inprevious_output.vout.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Rust
- Sterne
- 58
- Forks
- 41
- Ø Merge
- 2 T. 2 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 1
Entwicklungsumgebung
Dieses Projekt bietet weder Dev-Container noch Dockerfile noch Beitragsleitfaden – die Einrichtung liegt bei Ihnen. Beginnen Sie mit der README; die allgemeinen Schritte stehen in unserem Leitfaden für den ersten Beitrag.
Erste Schritte
- Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
- Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Mehr aus ElementsProject/rust-elements
-
Schwierigkeit 3/5 1-2 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 45/100
ElementsProject/rust-elements#290 · 1 Kommentar ·
-
Schwierigkeit 5/5 Über eine Woche Anfängerfreundlichkeit 25/100
ElementsProject/rust-elements#277 ·
-
Schwierigkeit 5/5 Über eine Woche Anfängerfreundlichkeit 30/100
ElementsProject/rust-elements#273 · 3 Kommentare ·
-
Schwierigkeit 5/5 Über eine Woche Anfängerfreundlichkeit 35/100
ElementsProject/rust-elements#268 · 1 Kommentar ·
-
Schwierigkeit 3/5 1-2 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 52/100
ElementsProject/rust-elements#262 · 2 Kommentare · 1 Reaktion ·
Alle Issues in ElementsProject/rust-elements
Ähnliche Issues
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 74/100
rubys/roundhouse#571 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 74/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 70/100
-
documentation
Schwierigkeit 1/5 Unter einer Stunde Anfängerfreundlichkeit 90/100
fastrevmd-lab/rustmistmcp#161 ·
-
arch-audit refactor
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 82/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1011 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag