Hacktoberfest 2026:維護者為十月標記出來的 issue,仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

PSET outputs lose their nonce on round trip: `extract_tx` for unblinded outputs, `to_txout` for blinded ones

未關閉
#299 0 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
4/5
預估耗時
3-5 天
新手友好度
52/100
Issue 類型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活躍度
活躍
技術堆疊
rust
領域
blockchain

研究方向

Start with the cited conversion code in src/pset/map/output.rs and src/pset/mod.rs, then run the two nonce round-trip tests from the reproduction. Trace how from_txout, Output::to_txout, and extract_tx choose nonce fields, and confirm the intended PSET semantics before changing them. Done means both unblinded and blinded round trips preserve the nonce while missing asset/value errors remain correct.

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

While working on Sighashes in SimplicityHL, the LLM picked up this issue. I unfortunately don't know enough of the design to know whether this field was left out on purpose. I've created an issue so long to document the problem.

Summary

A transaction loaded with PartiallySignedTransaction::from_tx doesn't always come back with the
same output nonces. There are two converters from a PSET output back to a TxOut, and each one
drops the nonce in a different case:

Output loaded with from_tx extract_tx Output::to_txout
unblinded, with a nonce nonce lost (Null) ok
blinded, with a nonce ok nonce lost (Null)

Checked at 582ea613cb. The code is the same in 0.25.3 and 0.26.2.

Cause

Output::from_txout puts the nonce in ecdh_pubkey for a blinded output and in blinding_key
for an unblinded one
(src/pset/map/output.rs#L212-L222):

if txout.is_partially_blinded() {
    rv.ecdh_pubkey = txout.nonce.commitment().map(|pk| PublicKey { inner: pk, compressed: true });
} else {
    rv.blinding_key = txout.nonce.commitment().map(|pk| PublicKey { inner: pk, compressed: true });
}

PartiallySignedTransaction::extract_tx only reads ecdh_pubkey
(src/pset/mod.rs#L330-L333),
so it misses the unblinded case:

nonce: out
    .ecdh_pubkey
    .map(|x| confidential::Nonce::from(x.inner))
    .unwrap_or_default(),

Output::to_txout picks the field with Output::is_partially_blinded
(src/pset/map/output.rs#L250-L256).
That function requires is_marked_for_blinding(), which means blinding_key.is_some()
(L272-L283).
A blinded output from from_txout has ecdh_pubkey set but no blinding_key, so to_txout takes
the else branch, reads blinding_key, and gets nothing.

Because of this, changing extract_tx to call to_txout as it is now would move the bug to
blinded outputs rather than fix it.

Reproduction

use elements::confidential::{Asset, Nonce, Value};
use elements::pset::PartiallySignedTransaction;
use elements::secp256k1_zkp::{Generator, Keypair, Secp256k1, Tag, Tweak};
use elements::{AssetId, LockTime, Script, Transaction, TxOut, TxOutWitness};

fn tx_with_output(asset: Asset) -> Transaction {
    let secp = Secp256k1::new();
    let pk = Keypair::from_seckey_slice(&secp, &[1u8; 32]).unwrap().public_key();
    Transaction {
        version: 2,
        lock_time: LockTime::ZERO,
        input: vec![],
        output: vec![TxOut {
            asset,
            value: Value::Explicit(1_000),
            nonce: Nonce::Confidential(pk),
            script_pubkey: Script::new(),
            witness: TxOutWitness::default(),
        }],
    }
}

#[test]
fn unblinded_output_nonce_round_trip() {
    let tx = tx_with_output(Asset::Explicit(AssetId::default()));
    let pset = PartiallySignedTransaction::from_tx(tx.clone());

    assert_eq!(pset.outputs()[0].to_txout().nonce, tx.output[0].nonce); // passes
    assert_eq!(pset.extract_tx().unwrap().output[0].nonce, tx.output[0].nonce); // fails: Null
}

#[test]
fn blinded_output_nonce_round_trip() {
    let secp = Secp256k1::new();
    let asset = Generator::new_blinded(&secp, Tag::from([2u8; 32]), Tweak::from_slice(&[3u8; 32]).unwrap());
    let tx = tx_with_output(Asset::Confidential(asset));
    let pset = PartiallySignedTransaction::from_tx(tx.clone());

    assert_eq!(pset.extract_tx().unwrap().output[0].nonce, tx.output[0].nonce); // passes
    assert_eq!(pset.outputs()[0].to_txout().nonce, tx.output[0].nonce); // fails: Null
}

Both tests fail on their second assertion, with left: Null.

Impact

Values, assets and scripts are unaffected. The nonce is part of what signatures commit to (the
taproot sighash's sha_outputs, and Simplicity's outputs_hash). So the txid changes on a round
trip, and a signature made over the original transaction doesn't verify on the extracted one, and
vice versa. As far as I can tell this fails closed, with invalid signatures or a changed txid, and
doesn't put funds at risk.

The extract_tx case needs an unblinded output that carries a nonce, which is unusual. The
to_txout case affects ordinary blinded transactions loaded with from_tx.

Possible fix

Use one rule in both places, for example ecdh_pubkey.or(blinding_key), and have extract_tx build
its outputs with to_txout. extract_tx would still need to return its own errors when the asset
or value is missing. That makes both rows of the table round-trip, and ecdh_pubkey wins whenever
an output has been blinded.

I'm not sure whether this is the intended semantics. Putting an unblinded output's nonce in
blinding_key marks that output for blinding. Under strict PSET rules, extracting it before it has
been blinded might be meant to fail instead. I also haven't checked what Elements Core does here.
The history suggests the inconsistency is accidental: 724a14d changed extract_tx from
blinding_key to ecdh_pubkey, and dc350a0 replaced the ecdh_pubkey.or(blinding_key) rule in
to_txout that e73ee1f had added.

Unrelated, but nearby: extract_tx seems to return swapped errors. It returns
MissingOutputValue when the asset is missing and MissingOutputAsset when the value is missing
(src/pset/mod.rs#L319-L329).

I'm happy to open a PR with the tests and a fix if this direction sounds right.

Related

  • #292 fixed a similar round-trip problem for inputs: extract_tx left the peg-in and issuance
    flags in previous_output.vout.
主要語言
Rust
星號
58
分支
41
平均合併
2 天 2 小時
30 天內合併 PR
1

環境準備

這個專案沒有提供開發容器、Dockerfile 或貢獻指南,環境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步驟見我們的新手貢獻指南。

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

ElementsProject/rust-elements 的其他 Issue

查看 ElementsProject/rust-elements 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Rust Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。