ci: rustup clippy component conflict intermittently fails Ubuntu checks
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 60/100
Research direction
The failing step is "Install pinned Rust" in .github/workflows/check.yml, which is the file to edit, and the same toolchain install is repeated in every job that uses it. Start by finding each place that installs 1.99.0 with clippy and rustfmt, then try the two-step approach the issue suggests: a minimal toolchain install followed by rustup component add. Done means the Ubuntu job passes several runs in a row, and the Windows and macOS jobs behave as before.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Problem
Check (ubuntu-24.04) intermittently fails in "Install pinned Rust":
error: failed to install component: 'clippy-preview-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu', detected conflict: 'bin/cargo-clippy'
Seen on dependabot PR #1 and on #91 (2026-10-16); a re-run passes. The runner image's preinstalled toolchain appears to conflict with installing 1.99.0 with --component clippy,rustfmt in one step.
Expected
Toolchain installation is deterministic on all runners.
Acceptance
- Fix in
.github/workflows/check.yml(e.g. install the 1.99.0 toolchain minimal first, thenrustup component add --toolchain 1.99.0 clippy rustfmt, or another approach verified against the rustup conflict), applied to every job that installs the toolchain. - Evidence: several consecutive green runs on ubuntu, plus windows/macos unchanged.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 4
- Forks
- 2
- Avg merge
- 2h 28m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 76
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from cristim/AztecCraft
-
area/viewport type/chore
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
cristim/AztecCraft#186 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
area/infra type/chore
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 94/100
cristim/AztecCraft#181 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
area/modeling type/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
cristim/AztecCraft#176 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
area/modeling type/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
cristim/AztecCraft#175 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
area/ui-parity type/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
cristim/AztecCraft#172 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in cristim/AztecCraft
Similar issues
-
area:ecosystem documentation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Chelis-Lang/chelis#3866 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
metasequoiaime/msime#8620 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
agent-detection macos p2 triaged
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug documentation sev-0
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day