Polaris external identity provider (mixed mode) and per-user data-access path
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Domain
- authentication, authorization, backend, databases
Research direction
Start with ADR 0015 and the referenced #179 ADR, then follow the five-step plan and its verification questions. Trace the bootstrap Job, olf, Polaris authentication, and Trino's iceberg.rest-catalog.session=USER path to identify the relevant entry points. Done means the mixed-mode migration and verification are complete, the per-user enforcement point is decided for both provider paths, and the dormant om principal and om_* fields are removed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Follow-up deferred from #26 and #179 (v0.5-alpha). Scope, sequenced before the v1.0 governance issues #54–#57 that assume identity reaches the data.
Background: ADR 0015 (PR #366) evaluates Polaris 1.4.0 external-authentication support and defers the migration. It does not replace Polaris' own principals; the issuer would replace authentication only, tokens must map to principals that already exist in the Polaris metastore, and external mode disables the token endpoint that the bootstrap Job and olf use, so mixed mode comes first.
Scope
- Execute the 5-step plan in ADR 0015 (mixed mode first; existing callers must keep working).
- Verify the ADR's "to verify" items: Polaris JVM trust of the local CA for the issuer URL; which claim names a Keycloak service-account principal; whether Floe accepts a non-Polaris token endpoint; Trino token refresh against 5-minute tokens; what Polaris receives under
iceberg.rest-catalog.session=USER; whether SeaweedFS can issue vended credentials. - Per-user data-access path (#179 ADR): decide where table-level policy is enforced for Polaris vs Glue + Lake Formation (different mechanisms); the shared enforcement point across providers is Trino.
- Remove the dormant
omPolaris principal and itsom_*contract fields (nothing reads its Secret; OpenMetadata crawls through Trino).
Out of scope
Implementing impersonation or any table/row/column policy in v0.5-alpha.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 26
- Forks
- 6
- Avg merge
- 12h 10m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 175
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from OpenLakeForge/openlakeforge
-
bug good first issue help wanted
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
OpenLakeForge/openlakeforge#498 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug good first issue help wanted
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
OpenLakeForge/openlakeforge#497 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
feat(cli): export `olf query` output directly to a filePossibly taken @dbdefault claimed this 1 day ago. Openenhancement good first issue help wanted
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
OpenLakeForge/openlakeforge#494 · 1 comment · 1 assignee ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
good first issue help wanted
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
OpenLakeForge/openlakeforge#488 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
good first issue help wanted
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
OpenLakeForge/openlakeforge#487 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in OpenLakeForge/openlakeforge
Similar issues
-
push_gh-pages fails on master branch on forksPossibly taken A pull request linked to this issue is open or already merged. Opengood first issue infrastructure
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
kuznia-rdzeni/coreblocks#1135 ·
-
good first issue server
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
documentation priority: high
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
a-lex-s/mealie-telegram-bot#54 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
type/test
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
SaltedTan/virgil-language-server#218 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 83/100
btclib-org/btclib-wallet#541 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day