LeanType crashing while trying to reconfigure toolbar
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100
Research direction
Start by reproducing the crash in Settings > Toolbar while enabling or disabling icons on LeanType 4.3.0-beta2 PR. The issue does not include a crash report, stack trace, or source file, so inspect the app's toolbar customization flow and capture a redacted exception trace to locate the failure. Done means toolbar changes save and can be made without a crash.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Description of the bug
Context-Aware Custom AI Toolbar Keys: Automatically hides unconfigured custom AI prompt keys in toolbar customization and pinned keys dialogs until configured in AI settings, reducing clutter.
After the above, my previously set toolbar icons were found changed. I tried to reconfigure the toolbar to my requirement, but every time I try to do that the app crashes.
To Reproduce
Go to Settings >> Toolbar and try to reconfigure (enable or disable) icons.
Expected behavior
The changes I make should stick and I should be able to reconfigure the toolbar to my liking.
Screenshots
The key indicated in the screenshot, although not configured, used to be displayed and worked well to bring up Gboard keyboard in my chosen language. How can I get it back working in 4.3.0 Beta 2 PR?
App version & Flavor
LeanType 4.3.0-beta2 PR
Device Info
- Model: OnePlus 11
- OS version: OxygenOS Android 14
I would prefer to retain direct switching to my selected Gboard language without having to configure an unnecessary AI prompt. Is this a regression, an intentional change to unconfigured custom AI keys, or should I continue to use the Direct Switch Target IME feature with custom keycode -10076?
Can the new visibility rule be made optional, or the old behaviour restored? I couldn't verify a user-facing setting that reverses the Beta 2 change.
Question to developer from a not-very-knowledgeable user:
What information can a crash report file contain beyond the exception and stack trace? In particular, could it include custom AI provider URLs, API keys, account identifiers, typed text, clipboard contents, learned words or personal dictionary entries?
Which specific fields or sections should be redacted before sharing the report? I want to be sure that the file being uploaded does not contain any sensitive information.
Is there a private avenue for submitting the original report directly to you, such as a private GitHub communication channel or another developer-approved method?
If public issue reporting is preferred, would a redacted report containing the relevant exception and stack trace be sufficient for diagnosing this crash?
I am happy to provide the diagnostic information needed to resolve the crash, but I would prefer not to publish potentially sensitive data unnecessarily.
Thank you.
- Dominant language
- Kotlin
- Stars
- 1k
- Forks
- 59
- Avg merge
- 14h 46m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 56
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from LeanBitLab/LeanType
-
Capital letters bug on beginning of typing in (new) appPossibly taken @LeanBitLab claimed this 1 day ago. Openbug
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 22/100
LeanBitLab/LeanType#743 · 3 comments · 1 reaction · 1 assignee ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 45/100
LeanBitLab/LeanType#738 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 70/100
LeanBitLab/LeanType#724 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 56/100
LeanBitLab/LeanType#721 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
LeanBitLab/LeanType#699 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in LeanBitLab/LeanType
Similar issues
-
OkHttp versions 5.4.0+ no longer include baseline-prof.txtPossibly taken A pull request linked to this issue is open or already merged. Openbug
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 83/100
lysine-dev/okhttp#9828 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 77/100
ReadYouApp/ReadYou#1347 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
yschimke/compose-preview-contracts#210 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
📦 expo-device Android contributor: external needs review sdk-58 severity: low
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
expo/expo#52547 · 2 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
afk-ok area:data-quality importer size:S
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
enorm-labs/event-junkie#4221 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day