LeanType crashing while trying to reconfigure toolbar

クローズ
#745 コメント 0 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信

まだ誰も着手していません。

評価

難易度
3/5
見積もり時間
1〜2日
初心者へのやさしさ
45/100
issue の種類
バグ
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
活発さ
活発
技術スタック
android, kotlin
領域
frontend, mobile

調査の方向性

Start by reproducing the crash in Settings > Toolbar while enabling or disabling icons on LeanType 4.3.0-beta2 PR. The issue does not include a crash report, stack trace, or source file, so inspect the app's toolbar customization flow and capture a redacted exception trace to locate the failure. Done means toolbar changes save and can be made without a crash.

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

bug

Description of the bug

Context-Aware Custom AI Toolbar Keys: Automatically hides unconfigured custom AI prompt keys in toolbar customization and pinned keys dialogs until configured in AI settings, reducing clutter.

After the above, my previously set toolbar icons were found changed. I tried to reconfigure the toolbar to my requirement, but every time I try to do that the app crashes.

To Reproduce
Go to Settings >> Toolbar and try to reconfigure (enable or disable) icons.

Expected behavior
The changes I make should stick and I should be able to reconfigure the toolbar to my liking.

Screenshots
The key indicated in the screenshot, although not configured, used to be displayed and worked well to bring up Gboard keyboard in my chosen language. How can I get it back working in 4.3.0 Beta 2 PR?

App version & Flavor
LeanType 4.3.0-beta2 PR

Device Info

  • Model: OnePlus 11
  • OS version: OxygenOS Android 14

I would prefer to retain direct switching to my selected Gboard language without having to configure an unnecessary AI prompt. Is this a regression, an intentional change to unconfigured custom AI keys, or should I continue to use the Direct Switch Target IME feature with custom keycode -10076?

Can the new visibility rule be made optional, or the old behaviour restored? I couldn't verify a user-facing setting that reverses the Beta 2 change.

Question to developer from a not-very-knowledgeable user:

What information can a crash report file contain beyond the exception and stack trace? In particular, could it include custom AI provider URLs, API keys, account identifiers, typed text, clipboard contents, learned words or personal dictionary entries?

Which specific fields or sections should be redacted before sharing the report? I want to be sure that the file being uploaded does not contain any sensitive information.

Is there a private avenue for submitting the original report directly to you, such as a private GitHub communication channel or another developer-approved method?

If public issue reporting is preferred, would a redacted report containing the relevant exception and stack trace be sufficient for diagnosing this crash?

I am happy to provide the diagnostic information needed to resolve the crash, but I would prefer not to publish potentially sensitive data unnecessarily.

Thank you.

Image
主要言語
Kotlin
スター
1k
フォーク
59
平均マージ
14時間 9分
マージ済み PR(30日)
56

環境構築

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

LeanBitLab/LeanType のほかの issue

LeanBitLab/LeanType の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

Kotlin の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。