Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

Feature: Add /v1/moderations endpoint

Open
  • Is something wrong?
#631 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Maintainers usually reply within 1 day

@nolanefe is already working on this.

Since Aug 3, 2026.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
43/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
go
Domain
api

Research direction

Start with route registration in internal/server/http.go around lines 407-458 and compare the existing /v1/embeddings endpoint flow. The issue says moderation has no route, handler, or provider-side call, so trace those entry points before estimating the work. Done means the endpoint accepts the stated request shape, returns the standard response for OpenAI, and gives a clear typed error for unsupported providers; the issue names no tests to run.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

enhancement good first issue

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
GoModel does not implement the OpenAI-compatible /v1/moderations endpoint. Users evaluating GoModel as a single gateway for all their OpenAI-shaped workloads currently have to keep a separate tool around just for moderation checks.

Confirmed missing: there is no route, handler, or provider-side moderation call anywhere in the codebase (zero matches for moderation-related routes under internal/server/, and the route registration list in internal/server/http.go around lines 407-458 has no /v1/moderations entry).

Describe the solution you'd like
Add a /v1/moderations endpoint that accepts the standard OpenAI request shape (input as a string or array of strings, optional model) and returns the standard response shape (results with category flags and scores).

Realistically this ships as an OpenAI-only endpoint at first: no other provider already wired into GoModel (Anthropic, Gemini, xAI, Fireworks, Groq, etc.) exposes a comparable native moderation endpoint. Requests for providers without moderation support should get a clear, typed "unsupported for this provider" error rather than a confusing generic failure.

Describe alternatives you've considered
None - this is a small, additive endpoint with no real alternative shape to consider (the OpenAI moderation request/response format is simple and well established).

Additional context
Of the OpenAI-compatible endpoints GoModel is still missing, this is the simplest to add - closer in shape to the already-implemented /v1/embeddings (single small JSON request/response, no streaming, no multipart) than to chat/responses.

Dominant language
Go
Stars
1.2k
Forks
111
Avg merge
14h 34m
Merged PRs (30d)
93

Getting set up

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from ENTERPILOT/GoModel

All issues in ENTERPILOT/GoModel

Similar issues

More Go issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.