Migrate unit tests from Jasmine/Karma to a modern stack
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
@alexandrevryghem is already working on this.
Since Oct 2, 2026.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.
Description
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Upgrade to Angular v18 was finalized in DSpace 9.0 (DSpace/dspace-angular#3304). However, Jasmine/Karma is still used for unit tests but, as noted in the issue, Karma is deprecated.
Angular v21 declared stable support for Vitest. This is also the Angular team's default choice for new projects in v21+ (moreover, Angular team also provided a guide on Migrating from Karma to Vitest, so the migration can be semi-automated.)
I'd like us to discuss and plan a migration away from Karma to a modern test runner. From what I can see, the most commonly mentioned options are:
- Vitest (default in Angular >=v21)
- Jest (has been around longer)
- Web Test Runner (runs tests in a real browser rather than Node/jsdom)
Vitest and Jest are both a test runner and a testing library, so they replace both Karma + Jasmine stack. Web Test Runner replaces only Karma (uses bult-in Mocha framework support, but has Jasmine adapter web-test-runner-jasmine).
Also, check out Vitest's Comparisons with Other Test Runners page.
What about Jasmine? Cypress?
Just to avoid confusion: Karma is only the test runner (it launches the browser and reports results). Jasmine is the testing framework we actually write tests with (spyOn etc.).
Both Vitest and Jest support Jasmine-style syntax (and maintain compatibility with most Jasmine functions)
We also use Cypress as the e2e tool (so it's not related to unit tests)
- To learn more, see also Vitest's comparison Cypress section
Describe the solution you'd like
This ticket is to discuss and plan a migration away from Karma.
Describe alternatives or workarounds you've considered
We are currently still using Karma via @angular-devkit/build-angular and @angular-builders/custom-webpack:karma. This works for now, but it depends on a deprecated package
Changing the unit test runner while on Angular v20 could make a future v21 upgrade smoother
Additional information
Karma/Jasmine and Angular Timeline
- Angular v16 declared that Karma was deprecated.
- This version added experimental support for Jest, and Web Test Runner [source]
- Angular v20 added experimental support for Vitest [source]
- Angular v21 declared Vitest as the primary test runner (and stable), replacing Karma [source]
- Before v21, however, it wasn't clear which runner Angular would ultimately favor. For example this great comment from Angular team developer suggested that Angular was really fond of supporting Jest
Vitest has gained significant traction recently. According to npm trends, Vitest downloads surpassed Jest around April 2026, and now seem to be 2x higher (Jest was first published in NPM 15 years ago, Vitest 5 years ago).
Questions for the Community
- Any strong opinions (for or against) any particular test runner?
- Any other alternatives we should consider?
- Has anyone already migrated a large Angular project from Karma? If so, what challenges did you face?
- Does anyone have experience with Vitest in a large Angular monorepo?
- Are there any DSpace-specific testing needs that might complicate migration?
References
- DSpace/dspace-angular#3304
- Vitest's Comparisons with Other Test Runners
- Angular's Migrating from Karma to Vitest Guide
- https://github.com/angular/angular-cli/issues/25217#issuecomment-1581581005
- Medium post comparing Jest and Vitest
- NPM Trends (in case of 404 error, please go directly to npmtrends.com and select packages manually)
Additional sources not directly mentioned in this issue:
- https://github.com/DSpace/dspace-angular/issues/2 - test stack original issue in DSpace/dspace-angular
- In Jest, default JS runner can be replaced with fast Rust-based SWC
- This post goes more into details on migrating from Karma to Vitest
- Angular Roadmap
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 180
- Forks
- 577
- Avg merge
- 2d 1h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 100
Getting set up
- Ships a Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from DSpace/dspace-angular
-
accessibility affects: 10.x affects: main bug ux
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
DSpace/dspace-angular#6531 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
accessibility affects: 10.x affects: main bug help wanted
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 66/100
DSpace/dspace-angular#6530 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Submission Form Allows Deletion of All Repeating Item EntriesPossibly taken @Rowan-McKereghan claimed this 5 days ago. Openaffects: 8.x affects: 9.x bug component: submission
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
DSpace/dspace-angular#6511 · 2 comments · 1 assignee ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Visual issues with qualdrop fieldsPossibly taken @DanGastardelli claimed this 15 days ago. Openaffects: 10.x affects: 9.x bug claimed: Acervos Digitais component: submission Difficulty: Low ux
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 66/100
DSpace/dspace-angular#6412 · 3 comments · 1 assignee ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Facet headings have incorrect clickable area to expand/collapsePossibly taken @jesielviana claimed this 12 days ago. Openaccessibility affects: 10.x affects: 8.x affects: 9.x bug ux
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
DSpace/dspace-angular#6364 · 3 comments · 1 assignee ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in DSpace/dspace-angular
Similar issues
-
bug parity
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
WenyuChiou/agent-board#1489 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
area: bazaar bug complexity: medium
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
accensa/x402-facilitator-stellar#779 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug good first issue P4 size:S web-ui
Difficulty 2/5 Half a day Newbie friendliness 85/100
josephfung/curia#2600 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
cloudflare/partykit#444 ·