RTCP SR/RR length check ignores the fixed header, report blocks are read past the packet end
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 2/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-3 小时
- 新手友好度
- 76/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- c
- 领域
- networking
调研方向
从 daemon/rtcp.c 中 rtcp_Xr() 的长度检查开始,并比较 daemon/rtcp.c 和 lib/rtcplib.h 中 RR 与 SR 的布局。检查 rtcp_rr_list() 如何使用声明的包长度,然后更新检查逻辑,使其考虑固定前缀和报告块。完成标准是短 RR 和 SR 示例被拒绝,而有效的 RR 仍被接受。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
rtpengine version the issue has been seen with
mr26.3.1.2 (3a3ef61), built from the tag, userspace only. The same code is on master at f950a9f.
Used distribution and its version
Debian 13 (container)
Linux kernel version used
6.8.0-90-generic (kernel module not used)
CPU architecture issue was seen on
aarch64
Expected behaviour you didn't see
An SR or RR packet whose report count (RC) does not fit in its declared length is rejected
("Failed to handle or parse RTCP packet type ...").
Unexpected behaviour you saw
rtcp_Xr() compares the packet length with count * sizeof(struct report_block) only. It
leaves out the 8-byte RR prefix (header + SSRC) and the 28-byte SR prefix (header, SSRC and
sender info) that come before the report blocks:
- daemon/rtcp.c#L519-L523 is the check.
- daemon/rtcp.c#L59-L82 and lib/rtcplib.h#L35-L38 define the layouts.
The only other length check is min_packet_sizes, which ensures just the prefix itself
(L454-L456, L683-L690).
rtcp_rr_list() then walks header.count blocks starting after the prefix
(L525-L551), so it can read past the end of the RTCP packet:
- up to 8 bytes for RR;
- up to 28 bytes for SR.
The bytes it reads are either the next packet of a compound RTCP packet, or the unused tail of
the receive buffer when the SR/RR is the last packet in the datagram. That tail is the
RTP_BUFFER_TAIL_ROOM slack, so the read stays inside the allocation:
What happens to these bytes:
scratch_rrcopies them into the receiver-report scratch area, so they go into the SSRC
stats/MOS (mos_rr), the RTCP log and the HEP JSON (homer_rr):
L972-L983,
L1058-L1069.- With SSRC translation active,
transcode_rralso writesssrc,number_lost,
fraction_lostandhigh_seq_receivedback into the same block
(L1296-L1356).
For an SR, that block can lie wholly past the packet's declared end.
Steps to reproduce the problem
Start rtpengine with --table=-1 --interface=127.0.0.1 --listen-ng=127.0.0.1:2223 --homer=127.0.0.1:9060 --homer-protocol=udp --homer-id=2001, set up a plain RTP/AVP PCMU call with offer and answer over NG, send a few RTP packets each way, then send these from the caller's RTCP port to rtpengine's RTCP port for it. Every datagram ends with the same APP packet (80 cc 00 02, SSRC 0x33333333, name ABCD). Each report block in the test uses SSRC 0x22222222, fraction lost 1, cumulative lost 5, highest sequence 256, jitter 7, LSR 0x0a0a0a0a and DLSR 0x0b0b0b0b, as far as it fits in the packet:
- RR, length field 5 (24 bytes), RC=1:
81 c9 00 05, SSRC, then 16 bytes.- The 8-byte minimum passes, and
24 < 1*24is false, so the packet is accepted. reports[0]covers bytes 8-31, which is 8 bytes past the end.
- The 8-byte minimum passes, and
- SR, length field 11 (48 bytes), RC=2:
82 c8 00 0b, SSRC, 20 bytes of sender info, then 20 bytes.- The 28-byte minimum passes, and
48 < 2*24is false, so the packet is accepted. - The blocks cover bytes 28-75; the second one lies entirely past the end.
- The 28-byte minimum passes, and
For comparison, a valid RR (length field 7, 32 bytes, RC=1) followed by the same APP packet.
Additional program output to the terminal or logs illustrating the issue
The report blocks in the HEP RTCP JSON that rtpengine sent for each datagram:
valid RR, length 7 (32 bytes):
81 c9 00 07 11 11 11 11 22 22 22 22 01 00 00 05 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 07 0a 0a 0a 0a 0b 0b 0b 0b | 80 cc 00 02 33 33 33 33 41 42 43 44
{"source_ssrc":572662306,"highest_seq_no":256,"fraction_lost":1,"ia_jitter":7,"packets_lost":5,"lsr":168430090,"dlsr":185273099}
short RR, length 5 (24 bytes), RC=1:
81 c9 00 05 11 11 11 11 22 22 22 22 01 00 00 05 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 07 | 80 cc 00 02 33 33 33 33 41 42 43 44
{"source_ssrc":572662306,"highest_seq_no":256,"fraction_lost":1,"ia_jitter":7,"packets_lost":5,"lsr":2160852994,"dlsr":858993459}
short SR, length 11 (48 bytes), RC=2:
82 c8 00 0b 11 11 11 11 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 04 00 00 00 05 22 22 22 22 01 00 00 05 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 07 0a 0a 0a 0a | 80 cc 00 02 33 33 33 33 41 42 43 44
{"source_ssrc":572662306,"highest_seq_no":256,"fraction_lost":1,"ia_jitter":7,"packets_lost":5,"lsr":168430090,"dlsr":2160852994},
{"source_ssrc":858993459,"highest_seq_no":0,"fraction_lost":65,"ia_jitter":0,"packets_lost":4342596,"lsr":0,"dlsr":0}
All three are accepted, and no warning is logged.
- In the short RR,
lsr2160852994 is0x80cc0002, the APP packet's first word, anddlsr858993459 is the APP packet's SSRC. - In the short SR, the second report block lies entirely past the SR. Its
source_ssrcis the APP SSRC, itsfraction_lost65 andpackets_lost4342596 areAandBCDfrom the APP name, and the rest is read from the receive buffer past the end of the datagram (zeros in this run).
With the check below, the two short packets are rejected with Failed to handle or parse RTCP packet type 201 and ... type 200, they produce no HEP report, and the valid RR is unchanged.
Anything else?
Suggested fix: include the fixed part in the check, for example by passing it into
rtcp_Xr():
- RR:
el->len < sizeof(struct receiver_report_packet) + count * sizeof(struct report_block); - SR: the same with
sizeof(struct sender_report_packet).
- 主要语言
- Perl
- 星标
- 992
- 派生
- 459
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
环境准备
这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南,环境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
sipwise/rtpengine 的其他 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 75/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 40/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 55/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 25/100
sipwise/rtpengine#2231 · 3 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 sipwise/rtpengine 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
agent-ready area:skills
难度 1/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
jmbarzee/temporal-architect#552 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
`config --theme` can't find theme files when the `~/Documents/Themes` directory is a symbolic link未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
1.severity: security
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
CARD data未关闭
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 86/100
-
check_keywords.pl dies before reporting an unknown keyword category可能已有人在做 @zhaohai666 于 3 天前认领。 未关闭
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 87/100
IvorySQL/IvorySQL#3077 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复