`unittest.mock.patch` and `unittest.mock.patch.object` are wrongly typed when new_callable is provided

未关闭
  • 哪里不对？
#14,339 2 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
3/5
预计耗时
1-2 天
新手友好度
48/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
python
领域
testing

调研方向

检查 issue 中显示的 unittest.mock.patch 和 patch.object 重载，然后找到它们的 typeshed 存根和相关测试。检查默认 patching、new、new_callable 以及不可调用的 new_callable 情况下推断出的类型；完成的标准是两个 API 都只接受可调用的 factory，并正确推断所创建对象的类型。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Steps to reproduce

from unittest.mock import patch


class NewPrinter:
    pass


with patch("pprint.PrettyPrinter", new_callable=lambda: NewPrinter) as patched_printer:
    print(patched_printer)  # <class '__main__.NewPrinter'>
    reveal_type(patched_printer)  # "Union[unittest.mock.MagicMock, unittest.mock.AsyncMock]"

Same deal with unittest.mock.patch.object

from unittest.mock import patch
import pprint

class NewPrinter:
    ...


with patch.object(pprint, "PrettyPrinter", new_callable=lambda: NewPrinter) as patched_printer:
    print(patched_printer)  # <class '__main__.NewPrinter'>
    reveal_type(patched_printer)  # "Union[unittest.mock.MagicMock, unittest.mock.AsyncMock]"

Suggested fix

We discuss unittest.mock.patch in the following, but the same principles apply to unittest.mock.patch.object too

Current signatures:

    @overload
    def __call__(
        self,
        target: str,
        new: _T,
        spec: Any | None = ...,
        create: bool = ...,
        spec_set: Any | None = ...,
        autospec: Any | None = ...,
        new_callable: Any | None = ...,
        **kwargs: Any,
    ) -> _patch[_T]: ...
    @overload
    def __call__(
        self,
        target: str,
        *,
        spec: Any | None = ...,
        create: bool = ...,
        spec_set: Any | None = ...,
        autospec: Any | None = ...,
        new_callable: Any | None = ...,
        **kwargs: Any,
    ) -> _patch_default_new: ...

There are 2 problems here:

  • new_callable shouldn't be Any | None in the first place, it should only accept Callable| None, as the it will raise if the provided value is not a callable 
    with patch("pprint.PrettyPrinter", new_callable=1) as patched_printer:  # TypeError: 'int' object is not callable
  • Need to differentiate the case where new_callable is provided and left as default None
    • When new_callable: Callable[..., T], returns _patch[_T]
    • When new_callable: None = ..., returns _patch_default_new

Seems like this would do the job:

    @overload
    def __call__(
        self,
        target: str,
        new: _T,
        spec: Any | None = ...,
        create: bool = ...,
        spec_set: Any | None = ...,
        autospec: Any | None = ...,
        new_callable: Callable[..., Any] | None = ...,
        **kwargs: Any,
    ) -> _patch[_T]: ...
    @overload
    def __call__(
        self,
        target: str,
        *,
        spec: Any | None = ...,
        create: bool = ...,
        spec_set: Any | None = ...,
        autospec: Any | None = ...,
        new_callable: Callable[..., _T],
        **kwargs: Any,
    ) -> _patch[_T]
    @overload
    def __call__(
        self,
        target: str,
        *,
        spec: Any | None = ...,
        create: bool = ...,
        spec_set: Any | None = ...,
        autospec: Any | None = ...,
        new_callable: None = ...,
        **kwargs: Any,
    ) -> _patch_default_new: ...

Testing results

from unittest.mock import patch


class NewPrinter:
    pass


with patch("pprint.PrettyPrinter") as patched_printer:
    print(patched_printer)  # <MagicMock name='PrettyPrinter' id='125908774402896'>
    reveal_type(patched_printer)  # MagicMock | AsyncMock


with patch("pprint.PrettyPrinter", new=NewPrinter) as patched_printer:
    print(patched_printer)  # <class '__main__.NewPrinter'>
    reveal_type(patched_printer)  # type[NewPrinter]


with patch("pprint.PrettyPrinter", new_callable=lambda: NewPrinter) as patched_printer:
    print(patched_printer)  # <class '__main__.NewPrinter'>
    reveal_type(patched_printer)  # type[NewPrinter]


# No overload variant matches for non-callable type
with patch("pprint.PrettyPrinter", new_callable="non-callable") as patched_printer:
    ...

Haven't tried unittest.mock.patch.object yet, but probably same thing

Would be great to see what the maintainers think.

I'll dig deeper and try to open a PR, maybe this weekend, will be my first PR in typeshed :)

主要语言
Python
星标
5.1k
派生
2.1k
平均合并
2 天 7 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
116

环境准备

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 阅读贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

python/typeshed 的其他 Issue

查看 python/typeshed 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。