`unittest.mock.patch` and `unittest.mock.patch.object` are wrongly typed when new_callable is provided

Aberta
  • Algo errado?
#14,339 2 comentários 0 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub

Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia

Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.

Avaliação

Dificuldade
3/5
Tempo estimado
1-2 dias
Facilidade para iniciantes
48/100
Tipo de issue
Bug
Clareza
Claramente especificada
Status de atividade
Estagnada
Stack de tecnologia
python
Domínio
testing

Direção de pesquisa

Revise as sobrecargas de unittest.mock.patch e patch.object mostradas na issue e, em seguida, encontre seus stubs do typeshed e os testes associados. Verifique os tipos inferidos para patching padrão, new, new_callable e os casos de new_callable não chamável; a tarefa estará concluída quando ambas as APIs aceitarem apenas factories chamáveis e inferirem corretamente o tipo criado.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Descrição

Steps to reproduce

from unittest.mock import patch


class NewPrinter:
    pass


with patch("pprint.PrettyPrinter", new_callable=lambda: NewPrinter) as patched_printer:
    print(patched_printer)  # <class '__main__.NewPrinter'>
    reveal_type(patched_printer)  # "Union[unittest.mock.MagicMock, unittest.mock.AsyncMock]"

Same deal with unittest.mock.patch.object

from unittest.mock import patch
import pprint

class NewPrinter:
    ...


with patch.object(pprint, "PrettyPrinter", new_callable=lambda: NewPrinter) as patched_printer:
    print(patched_printer)  # <class '__main__.NewPrinter'>
    reveal_type(patched_printer)  # "Union[unittest.mock.MagicMock, unittest.mock.AsyncMock]"

Suggested fix

We discuss unittest.mock.patch in the following, but the same principles apply to unittest.mock.patch.object too

Current signatures:

    @overload
    def __call__(
        self,
        target: str,
        new: _T,
        spec: Any | None = ...,
        create: bool = ...,
        spec_set: Any | None = ...,
        autospec: Any | None = ...,
        new_callable: Any | None = ...,
        **kwargs: Any,
    ) -> _patch[_T]: ...
    @overload
    def __call__(
        self,
        target: str,
        *,
        spec: Any | None = ...,
        create: bool = ...,
        spec_set: Any | None = ...,
        autospec: Any | None = ...,
        new_callable: Any | None = ...,
        **kwargs: Any,
    ) -> _patch_default_new: ...

There are 2 problems here:

  • new_callable shouldn't be Any | None in the first place, it should only accept Callable| None, as the it will raise if the provided value is not a callable 
    with patch("pprint.PrettyPrinter", new_callable=1) as patched_printer:  # TypeError: 'int' object is not callable
  • Need to differentiate the case where new_callable is provided and left as default None
    • When new_callable: Callable[..., T], returns _patch[_T]
    • When new_callable: None = ..., returns _patch_default_new

Seems like this would do the job:

    @overload
    def __call__(
        self,
        target: str,
        new: _T,
        spec: Any | None = ...,
        create: bool = ...,
        spec_set: Any | None = ...,
        autospec: Any | None = ...,
        new_callable: Callable[..., Any] | None = ...,
        **kwargs: Any,
    ) -> _patch[_T]: ...
    @overload
    def __call__(
        self,
        target: str,
        *,
        spec: Any | None = ...,
        create: bool = ...,
        spec_set: Any | None = ...,
        autospec: Any | None = ...,
        new_callable: Callable[..., _T],
        **kwargs: Any,
    ) -> _patch[_T]
    @overload
    def __call__(
        self,
        target: str,
        *,
        spec: Any | None = ...,
        create: bool = ...,
        spec_set: Any | None = ...,
        autospec: Any | None = ...,
        new_callable: None = ...,
        **kwargs: Any,
    ) -> _patch_default_new: ...

Testing results

from unittest.mock import patch


class NewPrinter:
    pass


with patch("pprint.PrettyPrinter") as patched_printer:
    print(patched_printer)  # <MagicMock name='PrettyPrinter' id='125908774402896'>
    reveal_type(patched_printer)  # MagicMock | AsyncMock


with patch("pprint.PrettyPrinter", new=NewPrinter) as patched_printer:
    print(patched_printer)  # <class '__main__.NewPrinter'>
    reveal_type(patched_printer)  # type[NewPrinter]


with patch("pprint.PrettyPrinter", new_callable=lambda: NewPrinter) as patched_printer:
    print(patched_printer)  # <class '__main__.NewPrinter'>
    reveal_type(patched_printer)  # type[NewPrinter]


# No overload variant matches for non-callable type
with patch("pprint.PrettyPrinter", new_callable="non-callable") as patched_printer:
    ...

Haven't tried unittest.mock.patch.object yet, but probably same thing

Would be great to see what the maintainers think.

I'll dig deeper and try to open a PR, maybe this weekend, will be my first PR in typeshed :)

Linguagem predominante
Python
Estrelas
5.1k
Forks
2.1k
Merge médio
2d 1h
PRs com merge (30d)
115

Preparar o ambiente

Primeiros passos

  1. Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
  2. Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
  3. Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
  4. Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.

Mais de python/typeshed

Todas as issues de python/typeshed

Issues semelhantes

Mais issues de Python

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.