Status and support
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 新手友好度
- 10/100
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 描述清晰度
- 需要澄清
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 技术栈
- python
调研方向
No files, tests, or code entry points are named. Read the issue and its three-comment thread first, then review the repository's current activity and support situation; this is done only when maintainers decide whether and how to grow the core developer team.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Hi @p1c2u,
First of all, I’d like to express my appreciation for this library and the work you and the community have invested so far. IMHO, this is conceptually the best approach to leveraging OpenAPI server-side, i.e. implementing request/response validation and unmarshaling completely independent of a particular web framework, which makes it reusable, and offering adapters and extensions/middlewares for some popular web frameworks. This is a beautiful separation of concerns which many other projects are lacking. If it was up to me, all other OpenAPI server related projects should build on openapi-core (and your related projects) and not reinvent the wheel over and over. One of those projects I mean is Connexion which, as far as I can tell, is the most feature-rich OpenAPI-first solution for Python at the moment and quite popular. But it’s a monolith with regard to its OpenAPI-related code, so that community is maintaining a non-reusable implementation just for this one project. And with newer releases of the OpenAPI spec, e.g. v3.1, all those projects will take a long time for adding support because forces are not joined.
I think openapi-core should be the common foundation like, e.g., jsonschema is pretty much used everywhere where JSON Schema validation is needed. But for this to become a reality, I believe openapi-core needs to mature a bit more, add some missing features, become more reliable in terms of activity and community management, and then a ton of communications work will be needed for convincing projects like Connexion to adopt it and drop their own implementation. I imagine this is just a side-project for you and you’re managing it in the best way possible, time allowing, that’s why I’m wondering whether you’ve been considering to grow the core developer team.
I fully believe in the value and the benefits of OpenAPI, and that’s why I’m generally puzzled why the OpenAPI-related tooling across numerous popular programming languages is in such bad shape. I’d love to see it improve, particularly for Python, and that’s why I’m reaching out. 🙂
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 368
- 派生
- 140
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
python-openapi/openapi-core 的其他 Issue
-
kind/bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
python-openapi/openapi-core#1188 · 2 条评论 ·
-
kind/bug
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 68/100
python-openapi/openapi-core#1225 · 2 条评论 ·
-
kind/bug
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 76/100
python-openapi/openapi-core#1212 ·
-
kind/bug
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 68/100
python-openapi/openapi-core#1210 ·
-
kind/bug kind/bug/confirmed
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 58/100
python-openapi/openapi-core#1180 · 3 条评论 ·
查看 python-openapi/openapi-core 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
syfoud/Simulated_Scepter#172 ·
-
A cancelled tests run makes the coverage comment workflow fail and reports it as a red check on main 未关闭area: ci bug perceived difficulty: 3
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
Nitjsefnie-Harness-Commons/daedalus#921 · 1 条评论 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 86/100
EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness#4207 ·
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 92/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
ClickHouse/clickhouse-connect#1057 ·