Status and support
まだ誰も着手していません。
評価
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 10/100
- issue の種類
- 機能追加
- 明瞭さ
- 説明が足りない
- 活発さ
- 停滞
- 技術スタック
- python
調査の方向性
No files, tests, or code entry points are named. Read the issue and its three-comment thread first, then review the repository's current activity and support situation; this is done only when maintainers decide whether and how to grow the core developer team.
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
説明
Hi @p1c2u,
First of all, I’d like to express my appreciation for this library and the work you and the community have invested so far. IMHO, this is conceptually the best approach to leveraging OpenAPI server-side, i.e. implementing request/response validation and unmarshaling completely independent of a particular web framework, which makes it reusable, and offering adapters and extensions/middlewares for some popular web frameworks. This is a beautiful separation of concerns which many other projects are lacking. If it was up to me, all other OpenAPI server related projects should build on openapi-core (and your related projects) and not reinvent the wheel over and over. One of those projects I mean is Connexion which, as far as I can tell, is the most feature-rich OpenAPI-first solution for Python at the moment and quite popular. But it’s a monolith with regard to its OpenAPI-related code, so that community is maintaining a non-reusable implementation just for this one project. And with newer releases of the OpenAPI spec, e.g. v3.1, all those projects will take a long time for adding support because forces are not joined.
I think openapi-core should be the common foundation like, e.g., jsonschema is pretty much used everywhere where JSON Schema validation is needed. But for this to become a reality, I believe openapi-core needs to mature a bit more, add some missing features, become more reliable in terms of activity and community management, and then a ton of communications work will be needed for convincing projects like Connexion to adopt it and drop their own implementation. I imagine this is just a side-project for you and you’re managing it in the best way possible, time allowing, that’s why I’m wondering whether you’ve been considering to grow the core developer team.
I fully believe in the value and the benefits of OpenAPI, and that’s why I’m generally puzzled why the OpenAPI-related tooling across numerous popular programming languages is in such bad shape. I’d love to see it improve, particularly for Python, and that’s why I’m reaching out. 🙂
- 主要言語
- Python
- スター
- 368
- フォーク
- 140
- PR マージ指標
- 30日以内にマージされた PR はありません
コントリビューションガイド
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
python-openapi/openapi-core のほかの issue
-
kind/bug
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
python-openapi/openapi-core#1188 · コメント 2 件 ·
-
kind/bug
難易度 3/5 1〜2日 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
python-openapi/openapi-core#1225 · コメント 2 件 ·
-
kind/bug
難易度 3/5 1〜2日 初心者へのやさしさ 76/100
python-openapi/openapi-core#1212 ·
-
[Bug]: Query parameter validation fails to match empty string when listed as a valid enum value オープンkind/bug
難易度 3/5 1〜2日 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
python-openapi/openapi-core#1210 ·
-
kind/bug kind/bug/confirmed
難易度 3/5 1〜2日 初心者へのやさしさ 58/100
python-openapi/openapi-core#1180 · コメント 3 件 ·
python-openapi/openapi-core の issue をすべて見る
似ている issue
-
documentation help wanted
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 90/100
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 90/100
simonw/sqlite-utils#872 ·
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 88/100
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 82/100
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 78/100