Hacktoberfest 2026：维护者为十月标记出来的 issue，仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Create validators not tied to attributes

未关闭
#647 5 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
35/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
python
领域
tooling

调研方向

The issue names no files or tests; start by reviewing the existing attribute-bound validator behavior shown through @x.validator. Compare it with the proposed class-level @validator and determine how cross-attribute checks should run. Done means a generic validator can enforce the relationship between x and y without being attached to only one attribute, with the behavior covered by tests.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Feature

Currently if I need to add a validator to check a condition that affects two attributes, I have to make it a validator of one of them. For example:

@attr.s
class C(object):
     x = attr.ib()
     y = attr.ib()

     @x.validator
     def x_smaller_than_y(self, _ , value):
          if value >= self.y:
          raise ValueError("'x' has to be smaller than 'y'!")

This feels a little unintuitive because this validator is not really a validator on just 'x'. It should be a validator on 'x' and 'y'. It made me wonder if the order of writing x and y in the class matters, in case the validator is run right after an attribute is set.

I wonder what folks think about a generic validator of this form:

@attr.s
class C(object):
     x = attr.ib()
     y = attr.ib()

     @validator
     def x_smaller_than_y(self):
          if self.x >= self.y:
          raise ValueError("'x' has to be smaller than 'y'!")
主要语言
Python
星标
5.8k
派生
480
平均合并
2 小时 15 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
2

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

python-attrs/attrs 的其他 Issue

查看 python-attrs/attrs 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。