Generic mapN and zipN

未关闭
#173 3 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
30/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
停滞

调研方向

Read the issue’s proposed map2–map10 and zip2–zip10 signatures, then inspect the existing zip implementation and the project’s typeclass conventions. Decide which abstraction can support the proposed generic operations and how Tuple and Tuple2 should differ; done means the API design and its supported types are agreed before implementation.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

status: blocked

Proposing we add these mapN functions, and make them available to more than just List.

map2 :: forall a b c f. Functor f => (a -> b -> c) -> f a -> f b -> f c
map3 :: forall a b c d f. Functor f => (a -> b -> c -> d) -> f a -> f b -> f c -> f d
...
map10 ...

We can then use the mapN functions to create zipN functions:

-- This already exists, but it would be nice to offer a more generic version:
zip :: forall a b f. Functor f => f a -> f b -> Tuple a b
zip = map2 Tuple

-- Likely needed to fill the gap between the seemingly-identical
-- (but actually different) `Tuple` and nested `Tuple2`.
zip2 :: forall a b f. Functor f => f a -> f b -> f (Tuple2 a b)
zip2 = map2 Tuple2

zip3 :: forall a b c f. Functor f => f a -> f b -> f c -> f (Tuple3 a b c)
zip3 = map3 Tuple3
...
zip10 :: ...
zip10 = map10 Tuple10

We probably need a different typeclass than Functor though. What about Zippable?

A motivation for adding these functions is to get closer to Elm's usability in this area:
https://package.elm-lang.org/packages/elm/core/latest/List#map2

主要语言
PureScript
星标
61
派生
50
平均合并
2 天 6 小时
30 天内合并 PR
1

环境准备

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 有 Pull Request 模板
  • 没有贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

purescript/purescript-lists 的其他 Issue

查看 purescript/purescript-lists 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Backend & API Design Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。