Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Idea: Coalesce cache scans for batched source removal

未关闭
#620 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
25/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
rust
领域
compilers

调研方向

No source files, tests, or entry points are named. Begin by collecting a real branch-switch or folder-removal trace, then measure time to fresh diagnostics as requested; the work is justified only if it shows a noticeable stall and preserves mixed-event ordering.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

ideas

Deferred idea

Removing a source file currently scans module ownership and the derived-query caches to discard affected entries. When one batch removes many warmed sources, those scans run again for every file. Consecutive removal-only events could be coalesced and retired together, so each cache is scanned only once. Any other event would first flush the pending removals, which keeps mixed-event ordering intact.

This is an idea to evaluate later, not a request to land the existing prototype.

Evidence so far

The benchmarks used real sources from the combined core+acme dependency closure: 631 packages and 7,371 sources, with modules checked before removal. The deletion scenarios themselves were constructed. They show the algorithmic cost but don't show a common workflow. For example, removing 100 sources cut the LSP watched-file handler median from 287 ms to 38 ms. Removing a single source doesn't benefit.

Why defer

  • Deletions in a repository are usually sparse. Restarting the language server is a reasonable workaround for an occasional large batch.
  • Branch switching might benefit, but it hasn't been measured. It also produces a mix of events rather than long runs of removals.

Revisit this after a real branch-switch or folder-removal trace shows a noticeable stall. At that point, measure the time to fresh diagnostics rather than claiming full-editor or cold-build gains.

Detailed measurements and prototype patches are in the investigation thread (Amp access required).

主要语言
Rust
星标
125
派生
12
平均合并
7 小时 34 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
89

环境准备

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 阅读贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

purefunctor/purescript-iris 的其他 Issue

查看 purefunctor/purescript-iris 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Rust Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。