Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Commonjs pb exports do not carry intellisense

未关闭
#18 4 条评论 7 个 reaction 已指派 1 人 在 GitHub 查看

@lukesandberg 已经在做这个了。

开始于 2021年6月9日。

评估

这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。

描述

enhancement good first issue javascript triaged

What version of protobuf and what language are you using?
Version: v3.6.1
Language: Javascript

What operating system (Linux, Windows, ...) and version?
Ubuntu 20.04, x86_64

What runtime / compiler are you using (e.g., python version or gcc version)
protoc pre-built compiler

What did you do?
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Create a sample protoc file, here simple.proto. I took it from this example, modified to "proto3"
  2. Use the compiler to autogen JavaScript code: protoc --js_out=import_style=commonjs,binary:. simple.proto
  3. Use the default export as an object with expected Schema: const Schema = require('./simple_pb');
  4. Attempt to use the expected Class(es) on that object: const test = new Schema.Test1();
  5. See that you do not receive intellisense for the Test1() class, nor for expected operations it's instances

What did you expect to see
Intellisense for the simple_pb operations on the default export.

What did you see instead?
No Intellisense, but the operations themselves do execute (setting values, serialzing to Binary).

I was able to "fix" the issue by changing the last line of the simple_pb.js file. The goog export extension did not work, so I just commented it out and spread the goog and proto objects into module.exports:

module.exports = {...goog, ...proto};
// goog.object.extend(exports, proto);
主要语言
JavaScript
星标
471
派生
91
平均合并
3 小时 57 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
2

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

protocolbuffers/protobuf-javascript 的其他 Issue

查看 protocolbuffers/protobuf-javascript 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 JavaScript Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。