Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

[5.x] TIA: replayed tests report stale/incomplete coverage, breaking --min

未关闭
#374 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
45/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
冷清
技术栈
php
领域
testing

调研方向

Start by tracing Pest\Plugins\Tia coverage handling, especially KEY_COVERAGE_CACHE (coverage.bin.gz) and the mergePerTestFiles() call that combines collector and recorder data. Reproduce with --coverage --tia --min=100 using a cold and warm ~/.pest/tia cache, then verify that replayed tests produce the same coverage totals and pass the minimum gate as a fresh run.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

ENVIRONMENT

pestphp/pest v5.0.2
phpunit/phpunit 13.2.6
phpunit/php-code-coverage 14.2.4
laravel/framework v13.23.0
PHP 8.4.20
Coverage driver pcov 1.0.13-dev (Xdebug not installed)
OS Linux 6.17.0 (Docker, SLES-based image)
Suite size 666 tests / 1687 assertions

SUMMARY

When --coverage and --tia are combined, coverage numbers depend on whether the
TIA cache is warm. With a cold cache the suite reports 100.0%. Running the exact
same command again — no source or test changes in between — reports 99.9% and
fails --min=100.

The drop is deterministic and always hits the same two files. Those files are
fully covered: running --coverage without --tia reports them at 100.0%.

This makes --coverage --tia unusable as a CI gate, and it is misleading during
development: it points at files as under-covered when their tests exist and pass.

STEPS TO REPRODUCE

  1. Have a suite that reaches 100% line coverage.

  2. Clear the TIA cache and run with coverage:

    rm -rf ~/.pest/tia
    php -d pcov.enabled=1 vendor/bin/pest --coverage --tia --min=100

    -> Tests: 666 passed (1687 assertions)
    -> Total: 100.0 %
    -> exit code 0

  3. Run the exact same command again, changing nothing:

    php -d pcov.enabled=1 vendor/bin/pest --coverage --tia --min=100

    -> Tests: 666 passed (1687 assertions, 666 replayed)
    -> Domain/B2B/Actions/UpdateProductAction ............... 94 / 97.4%
    -> Livewire/B2B/Produtos/AbstractProdutosTable ... 306..348 / 98.9%
    -> Total: 99.9 %
    -> FAIL Code coverage below expected 100.0 %, currently 99.9 %
    -> exit code 1

  4. Confirm the files are actually covered, without TIA:

    php -d pcov.enabled=1 vendor/bin/pest --coverage

    -> Domain/B2B/Actions/UpdateProductAction ............... 100.0%
    -> Livewire/B2B/Produtos/AbstractProdutosTable .......... 100.0%
    -> Total: 100.0 %

Steps 2-4 reproduce every time, in this order.

EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR

Coverage totals should be identical whether tests are executed or replayed from
the TIA cache. A replayed test should contribute the same coverage data it
contributed when it last ran.

ACTUAL BEHAVIOUR

Replayed tests contribute incomplete coverage data. The reported total drops from
100.0% to 99.9%, and --min=100 fails on a suite that has not changed.

NOTES THAT MIGHT HELP NARROW IT DOWN

  • The uncovered ranges reported under TIA are not random. They are always the same
    two files, and always the same line ranges:

    • UpdateProductAction line 94 — a match ($segmento) expression whose two arms
      are each exercised by a different test file.
      Covered by 2 test files.
    • AbstractProdutosTable lines 306..348 — a match ($result) with four arms plus
      two public methods.
      Covered by 3 test files (one per concrete subclass, plus a permissions test).

    Both regions happen to be covered by more than one test file, and both are
    match expressions whose arms are split across those files. We could not turn
    that into a conclusion, though: plenty of other classes in this suite are also
    touched by many test files (SegmentoEnum by 40) and stayed at 100.0% under TIA.
    So multi-file coverage alone is not sufficient to trigger it — reporting the
    observation as-is rather than a diagnosis.

  • The tests covering those regions were not affected by the change that warmed the
    cache, so they were replayed rather than re-executed.

  • Relevant-looking internals: Pest\Plugins\Tia has piggybackCoverage,
    KEY_COVERAGE_CACHE ('coverage.bin.gz') and a mergePerTestFiles() call that
    merges the collector's per-test files with the recorder's. If the merge keeps
    only one contributor per file/line, a region covered by several test files would
    lose the contributions of the replayed ones — which matches what we observe.

  • Cache location in our setup: ~/.pest/tia/-/
    coverage.bin.gz (1.0 MB)
    graph.json (358 KB)

  • No custom coverage config: no --coverage-filter, no --path-coverage, plain
    phpunit.xml source include of app/.

  • --tia on its own (no coverage) is correct: it replays properly and the suite
    passes in 0.86s vs 61s. Only the coverage numbers are affected.

IMPACT / CURRENT WORKAROUND

We can't use --coverage --tia as a gate. We split the two uses in composer
scripts, wiping the TIA cache before any coverage run:

"test:tia":      "pest --tia"
"test:coverage": wipe ~/.pest/tia, then "pest --coverage --min=100"

That restores a trustworthy number, at the cost of losing TIA's speed for any run
that also measures coverage.

主要语言
没有语言数据
星标
56
派生
180
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

pestphp/docs 的其他 Issue

查看 pestphp/docs 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Testing & QA Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。