Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

[5.x] TIA: replayed tests report stale/incomplete coverage, breaking --min

Abierto
#374 0 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Aptitud para principiantes
45/100
Tipo de issue
Error
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Tranquilo
Stack tecnológico
php
Área
testing

Línea de trabajo

Start by tracing Pest\Plugins\Tia coverage handling, especially KEY_COVERAGE_CACHE (coverage.bin.gz) and the mergePerTestFiles() call that combines collector and recorder data. Reproduce with --coverage --tia --min=100 using a cold and warm ~/.pest/tia cache, then verify that replayed tests produce the same coverage totals and pass the minimum gate as a fresh run.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

ENVIRONMENT

pestphp/pest v5.0.2
phpunit/phpunit 13.2.6
phpunit/php-code-coverage 14.2.4
laravel/framework v13.23.0
PHP 8.4.20
Coverage driver pcov 1.0.13-dev (Xdebug not installed)
OS Linux 6.17.0 (Docker, SLES-based image)
Suite size 666 tests / 1687 assertions

SUMMARY

When --coverage and --tia are combined, coverage numbers depend on whether the
TIA cache is warm. With a cold cache the suite reports 100.0%. Running the exact
same command again — no source or test changes in between — reports 99.9% and
fails --min=100.

The drop is deterministic and always hits the same two files. Those files are
fully covered: running --coverage without --tia reports them at 100.0%.

This makes --coverage --tia unusable as a CI gate, and it is misleading during
development: it points at files as under-covered when their tests exist and pass.

STEPS TO REPRODUCE

  1. Have a suite that reaches 100% line coverage.

  2. Clear the TIA cache and run with coverage:

    rm -rf ~/.pest/tia
    php -d pcov.enabled=1 vendor/bin/pest --coverage --tia --min=100

    -> Tests: 666 passed (1687 assertions)
    -> Total: 100.0 %
    -> exit code 0

  3. Run the exact same command again, changing nothing:

    php -d pcov.enabled=1 vendor/bin/pest --coverage --tia --min=100

    -> Tests: 666 passed (1687 assertions, 666 replayed)
    -> Domain/B2B/Actions/UpdateProductAction ............... 94 / 97.4%
    -> Livewire/B2B/Produtos/AbstractProdutosTable ... 306..348 / 98.9%
    -> Total: 99.9 %
    -> FAIL Code coverage below expected 100.0 %, currently 99.9 %
    -> exit code 1

  4. Confirm the files are actually covered, without TIA:

    php -d pcov.enabled=1 vendor/bin/pest --coverage

    -> Domain/B2B/Actions/UpdateProductAction ............... 100.0%
    -> Livewire/B2B/Produtos/AbstractProdutosTable .......... 100.0%
    -> Total: 100.0 %

Steps 2-4 reproduce every time, in this order.

EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR

Coverage totals should be identical whether tests are executed or replayed from
the TIA cache. A replayed test should contribute the same coverage data it
contributed when it last ran.

ACTUAL BEHAVIOUR

Replayed tests contribute incomplete coverage data. The reported total drops from
100.0% to 99.9%, and --min=100 fails on a suite that has not changed.

NOTES THAT MIGHT HELP NARROW IT DOWN

  • The uncovered ranges reported under TIA are not random. They are always the same
    two files, and always the same line ranges:

    • UpdateProductAction line 94 — a match ($segmento) expression whose two arms
      are each exercised by a different test file.
      Covered by 2 test files.
    • AbstractProdutosTable lines 306..348 — a match ($result) with four arms plus
      two public methods.
      Covered by 3 test files (one per concrete subclass, plus a permissions test).

    Both regions happen to be covered by more than one test file, and both are
    match expressions whose arms are split across those files. We could not turn
    that into a conclusion, though: plenty of other classes in this suite are also
    touched by many test files (SegmentoEnum by 40) and stayed at 100.0% under TIA.
    So multi-file coverage alone is not sufficient to trigger it — reporting the
    observation as-is rather than a diagnosis.

  • The tests covering those regions were not affected by the change that warmed the
    cache, so they were replayed rather than re-executed.

  • Relevant-looking internals: Pest\Plugins\Tia has piggybackCoverage,
    KEY_COVERAGE_CACHE ('coverage.bin.gz') and a mergePerTestFiles() call that
    merges the collector's per-test files with the recorder's. If the merge keeps
    only one contributor per file/line, a region covered by several test files would
    lose the contributions of the replayed ones — which matches what we observe.

  • Cache location in our setup: ~/.pest/tia/-/
    coverage.bin.gz (1.0 MB)
    graph.json (358 KB)

  • No custom coverage config: no --coverage-filter, no --path-coverage, plain
    phpunit.xml source include of app/.

  • --tia on its own (no coverage) is correct: it replays properly and the suite
    passes in 0.86s vs 61s. Only the coverage numbers are affected.

IMPACT / CURRENT WORKAROUND

We can't use --coverage --tia as a gate. We split the two uses in composer
scripts, wiping the TIA cache before any coverage run:

"test:tia":      "pest --tia"
"test:coverage": wipe ~/.pest/tia, then "pest --coverage --min=100"

That restores a trustworthy number, at the cost of losing TIA's speed for any run
that also measures coverage.

Lenguaje dominante
Sin datos de lenguaje
Estrellas
56
Forks
180
Métricas de merge de PR
Sin PR fusionados en 30 d

Guía de contribución

No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de pestphp/docs

Todos los issues de pestphp/docs

Issues similares

Más issues de Testing & QA

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.