FAPI2: [Security Profile ISO/IEC 26083-1 Review Comments] General and Editorial updates
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 35/100
- Issue 类型
- 文档
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活跃度
- 冷清
调研方向
先从 issue 中关于 ISO 评论和拟议变更的表格开始,然后针对每一项审阅 FAPI 2.0 Security Profile 文档和 WG 讨论。确认哪些评论被接受为勘误或仅限 PAS 的变更,并在约定的标题、引用、格式、附录和已删除的章节都反映在文档中后,视为工作完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Originally submitted by M V (Mark Verstege) on 2026-01-28
ISO has approved FAPI 2.0 Security Profile as a Publicly Available Specification (PAS) subject to the following modifications.
The table below proposes whether this is an errata for FAPI 2.0 Security Profile, or simply a modification of the ISO PAS submission but it would not result in an errata.
| Comment # | Section | ISO Comment | ISO Proposed Change | Errata/PAS Only Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Not specified | Update PAS document title to align with FAPI 1.0 submission. | Modify the title of this document to “Information technology — OpenID Connect FAPI Security Profile 2.0 — Part 1: Security Profile” | PAS only |
|
| 2 | 2 | Normative references should be in the clause 2. | Move the clause 10’s normative references to the clause 2. | PAS only
|
| 3 | 4 | The ISO House style states that “If the full form of an abbreviated term is not a proper noun, the abbreviated term is generally presented in capital letters, e.g. DMA, but the full written form is not given initial capital letters, e.g. decision-making application and not Decision-Making Application.” | Un-capitalize the full written form of the abbreviated terms. | PAS only
|
| 4 | 7 | The ISO House style states that “Avoid using italics, bold and underline to give emphasis to words or paragraphs in the text”. | Un-bold the texts in the clause. | PAS only
|
| 5 | 9 | As an ISO/IEC document obviously meets the "requirements" of ISO/IEC Directives Part 2, it is not positioned as informative documents. | Remove "ISODIR2 ISO/IEC Directives Part 2" from the Normative References. | Errata
|
| 6 | 10 | According to the ISO/IEC Directives Part 2’s 10.2 Permitted referenced documents e), “Informative references shall be listed in the Bibliography”. | Create a Bibliography section (shall not have a clause number), and place the informative references there. | Errata
|
| 7 | all | The colour of the texts is not black. | Fix the colour of the texts to black. | PAS only
|
| 8 | all | There should be a space between “RFC”/”ISO” and its number. | Insert a space between “RFC”/”ISO” and the numbers afterwards. | Errata
|
| 9 | all | NOTEs do not have to be in bold. | Un-bold “NOTE” in the document. | Errata
|
| 10 | Appendix A | Acknowledgements" in original document is not necessary for ISO/IEC document. | Remove the Appendix A. | PAS only
|
| 11 | ppendix B | | Appendix B" corresponds to "Annex B" in ISO/IEC document and the rules of ISO/IEC Directives Part 2, Clause 20 applies. Each annex shall be explicitly referred to within the text. Suggests FAPI specification is changed to refer to Annexes, nor Appendixes, or only the PAS document is updated | Replace "Appendix B. Notices" with "Annex A (informative) Notices". Insert "See Annex A." or corresponding explanation where Annex A is referred within this document. | Errata
|
| 12 | Author’s Addresses | Author’s Addresses" in original document is not necessary for ISO/IEC document. | Remove "Author’s Addresses" | PAS only
|
| 13 | Notational Conventions | As this is an ISO document, there is no need to clarify the notational conventions. | Remove the Notational Conventions clause. | AS only
|
| 14 | Warning | It states that the document is still a draft. | Remove the Warning clause. | PAS only
|
WG Accept / Reject: to be discussed and handling agreed for each comment.
When commenting on individual comments, can WG members please indicate if it is designated an errata, or it only relates to the PAS submission, but not the specification. Also indicate whether you Accept/Partially Accept/Reject the proposed change.
Bitbucket status: open
Bitbucket origin: issue 849
- 主要语言
- HTML
- 星标
- 5
- 派生
- 3
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
环境准备
这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南,环境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
openid/fapi 的其他 Issue
-
component: FAPI 1: Advanced migrated-from-bitbucket priority: major type: bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 62/100
-
migrated-from-bitbucket priority: trivial type: bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
-
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 30/100
-
component: Implementation & Deployment Advice
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 55/100
-
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 35/100
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
letsencrypt/cp-cps#361 ·
-
难度 1/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 85/100
cocos/cocos-docs#3333 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 74/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
lesson-submission pending-review
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
Ikalus1988/MisakaNet#3956 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
aws-samples/sample-per-model-bedrock#574 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复