[curriculum-eval] side-quest-17-07-repo-poisoning.md: cognitive_load — 23 concepts in 1234 words, sparse hands-on activity

未关闭 适合新手
  • 哪里不对？
#5,744 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
2/5
预计耗时
1-3 小时
新手友好度
82/100
Issue 类型
文档
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
markdown
领域
documentation

调研方向

打开 workshop/side-quest-17-07-repo-poisoning.md，先从头到尾读一遍，注意两个练习以及 ## How AW Defends Against It 下的四个防御 ### 小节。按照改进提示操作：删减到 900 词和 15 个概念以内，每个术语只链接一次，合并路径限制和网络限制小节，并在每个剩余防御后添加一行 "Try it" 任务，同时保留目标、Before You Start 和 Checkpoint 小节。完成意味着该文件通过 npx --yes markdownlint-cli2 "**/*.md"，并且达到词数和活动密度目标。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

curriculum documentation quality

File: workshop/side-quest-17-07-repo-poisoning.md
Overall Score: 5.0 / 10.0 (corpus mean: 6.1)

Flagged Dimensions:

Dimension Score Benchmark Delta
cognitive_load 5.8 ≤ 800 words, ≤ 15 concepts (1234 words, 23 concepts) −4.2
active_learning 2.7 density ≥ 3 (0.81) −7.3

(missing_checkpoint dismissed: checkpoint exists with 6 items; see detector issue.)

Root Cause (≤ 2 sentences):
The page introduces the attack, four defenses (read-only permissions, PR routing, protected paths, network limits) and two exercises in one sitting, and every second phrase links to a new term. Prose-heavy defenses sections dilute the two exercises that actually drive learning.

Evidence (quoted from the file):

## How AW Defends Against It followed by four ### subsections (Declare read-only permissions, Route writes through a pull request, Restrict which paths can change, Limit network destinations) before any exercise begins at ## :pencil2: Exercise: Spot the Dangerous Frontmatter.

Learning Science Rationale:
Sweller's Cognitive Load Theory and the pre-training principle (Mayer) suggest introducing a limited set of concepts then practising each before adding more; the testing effect (Roediger & Karpicke) favours interleaving short exercises with each defense rather than deferring all practice to the end.

Improvement Prompt (for an agent):

Edit workshop/side-quest-17-07-repo-poisoning.md to ≤ 900 words and ≤ 15 new concepts: remove duplicate link annotations (link each term once), merge "Restrict which paths" and "Limit network destinations" into one short subsection, and add a 1-line "Try it" task (a code block or checklist item) after each remaining defense so activity density ≥ 3. Preserve the :dart: objectives, :clipboard: Before You Start, and :white_check_mark: Checkpoint sections, avoid numbered headings, and run `npx --yes markdownlint-cli2 "**/*.md"`.

Expected Score After Fix: 5.9 / 10.0 (≈ 8.4 once the detector is fixed)

Generated by 🔬 Curriculum Quality Evaluator · copilot · auto · ~40 AIC · ⌖ ~1 AIC · ⊞ 5K · ◷

  • expires on Nov 16, 2026, 5:04 AM UTC
主要语言
JavaScript
星标
62
派生
43
平均合并
11 小时 26 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
13

环境准备

在 Codespaces 中打开

在浏览器里用你自己的 GitHub 账号启动这个项目的开发容器。

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 没有贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

githubnext/gh-aw-workshop 的其他 Issue

查看 githubnext/gh-aw-workshop 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 JavaScript Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。