[workshop-sim] Improve: Add intermediate checks to Step 4's workflow-labeling exercise

已关闭 适合新手
  • 哪里不对？
#4,043 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 3 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
2/5
预计耗时
1-3 小时
新手友好度
85/100
Issue 类型
文档
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
github-actions
领域
documentation

调研方向

打开 04-github-actions-intro.md，找到 workflow 标注练习、现有的 ## ✅ Checkpoint 部分，以及最后的 Try it 活动。将标注练习拆分为 issue 中描述的两个已勾选部分，然后验证原有内容和活动仍然保留，并确保定量评估和 Learning KPI 指数保持不变或有所提升。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

feedback simulation workshop

Problem statement: 04-github-actions-intro.md is the lowest-scoring page in the curriculum (overall_score 5.39/10) and the third-highest-dropout step (15.29% conditional dropout among 44,174 at-risk runs, 95% MC interval 14.96%–15.63%). The failure category is 100% concept-overload — a learning barrier, not a tooling/auth issue. The page packs a classic-vs-agentic comparison table, a 5-item workflow labeling exercise, and a browser-based "explore a real workflow" activity into one page with zero callouts (calloutCount: 0) and a single dense 5-item checkpoint at the end (checkpoint_quality 0.0, active_learning 3.9).

Proposed change: Split the existing labeling exercise into two smaller checked sub-tasks: (1) label just the on/jobs/runs-on trio with an immediate "Reveal the labels" check, then (2) label uses/run as a second, separate micro-check, before moving to the classic-vs-agentic comparison table. This adds an intermediate recall checkpoint without removing any existing content, activity, or the final "Try it" browser exploration.

Failure mode classification: Learning barrier (conceptual density, insufficient scaffolding/active-learning support — not an access or tooling issue).

Quantitative guardrail: 04-github-actions-intro.md currently scores overall_score 5.39/10, active_learning 3.9/10, checkpoint_quality 0.0/10, scaffolding 5.0/10 (Learning KPI index = 2.78/10). Splitting one dense labeling exercise into two smaller, independently-checked sub-tasks directly targets the low active_learning and checkpoint_quality scores by adding more frequent self-check points, without reducing content coverage, so overall_score and the Learning KPI index should rise, not fall.

Acceptance criteria:

  • The curriculum quantitative assessment overall_score for 04-github-actions-intro.md stays flat or improves after the change
  • The step's Learning KPI index (2.0 × active_learning + 2.0 × checkpoint_quality + 1.5 × scaffolding) / 5.5 stays flat or improves
  • The labeling exercise content and the final browser-based "Try it" activity are preserved in full (split into two checked parts, not shortened)
  • The existing end-of-page ## :white_check_mark: Checkpoint section is retained alongside the new intermediate checks, not replaced by them

Suggested owner profile: copilot coding agent
Related to #4041

Generated by 🔬 Workshop Student Simulator · copilot · auto · 157.6 AIC · ⌖ 13.6 AIC · ⊞ 15.1K · ◷

  • expires on Oct 2, 2026, 7:59 AM UTC
主要语言
JavaScript
星标
58
派生
40
平均合并
4 天 4 小时
30 天内合并 PR
8

环境准备

在 Codespaces 中打开

在浏览器里用你自己的 GitHub 账号启动这个项目的开发容器。

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 没有贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

githubnext/gh-aw-workshop 的其他 Issue

查看 githubnext/gh-aw-workshop 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 JavaScript Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。