[function-namer] Go function rename plan: pkg/linters/sprintfbool
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
调研方向
阅读 pkg/linters/sprintfbool/sprintfbool.go,检查 replacementForCall 及其在 analyzeSprintfBool 中的调用;查找 Go 文件和测试文件中的其他引用。重命名 helper 并更新其引用,同时保持行为不变。代码构建成功且包测试通过后即完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
🏷️ Go Function Rename Plan
Package Analyzed: pkg/linters/sprintfbool
Analysis Date: 2026-11-06
Round-Robin Position: package 165 of 253 total packages
Functions Analyzed: 7 functions across 1 file
Why This Matters
When AI coding agents search for functions to complete a task, they rely on function names to understand what code does. Clear, descriptive names increase the likelihood that an agent will find the right function instead of reimplementing existing logic. Functions in the same package also call each other, so reviewing them together gives better context for rename decisions.
Key Findings
The package has a focused naming scheme for its analyzer, candidate collection, diagnostics, import edits, and suggested fixes. One helper, replacementForCall, is less discoverable because it does not identify the sprintfbool capability or explain that it determines whether a detected boolean formatting call can be safely rewritten. Serena found one internal call site at line 56 in analyzeSprintfBool.
Rename Suggestions
pkg/linters/sprintfbool/sprintfbool.go
| Current Name | Suggested Name | Reason |
|---|---|---|
replacementForCall() |
determineSprintfBoolReplacement() |
Names the linter capability and makes clear that the helper determines the replacement metadata and safety conditions for a detected fmt.Sprintf("%t", bool) call, rather than handling an unspecified call replacement. |
All functions in this file (for reference):
analyzeSprintfBool()— ✅ Clear, no change neededcollectSprintfBoolCandidates()— ✅ Clear, no change neededcomputeOrphanedFmtImportStatus()— ✅ Clear, no change neededreportSprintfBoolDiagnostics()— ✅ Clear, no change neededbuildFormatBoolFix()— ✅ Clear, no change neededbuildStrconvFmtImportEdits()— ✅ Clear, no change neededreplacementForCall()— ⚠️ Rename suggested (see table above)
🤖 Agentic Implementation Plan
Agentic Implementation Plan
This issue is designed to be assigned to a coding agent. The agent should implement all rename suggestions below in a single pull request.
Prerequisites
- Read the rename suggestion and verify it is accurate by reviewing the function body
- Check for any Go interface constraints that prevent renaming
Implementation Steps
1. Rename the function in pkg/linters/sprintfbool/sprintfbool.go
// Old
func replacementForCall(pass *analysis.Pass, call *ast.CallExpr, arg ast.Expr, file *ast.File) replacement {
// New
func determineSprintfBoolReplacement(pass *analysis.Pass, call *ast.CallExpr, arg ast.Expr, file *ast.File) replacement {
2. Update all call sites
Use grep to find every caller and update the reference:
grep -rn "replacementForCall" pkg/ --include="*.go"
Also check test files:
grep -rn "replacementForCall" pkg/ --include="*_test.go"
The current semantic reference is the call from analyzeSprintfBool; preserve its behavior and arguments.
3. Verify compilation after the rename
make build
4. Run tests after the rename is complete
make test-unit
make lint
Commit Convention
refactor: rename replacementForCall to determineSprintfBoolReplacement for clarity
Validation Checklist
- Rename implemented
- All call sites updated in Go files and test files
-
make buildpasses with no errors -
make test-unitpasses -
make lintpasses - Pull request description explains the agent-discoverability rationale
Notes for the Agent
- This is a pure rename refactor: behavior must not change, only the function name and references.
- If the rename causes unexpected complexity, skip it and leave a comment in the pull request explaining why.
- Follow existing naming conventions documented in
AGENTS.md.
References:
Generated by 🔧 Daily Go Function Namer · pi · routed: gpt56 max · ~4 AIC · ⌖ ~2 AIC · ⊞ 7.4K · ◷
- expires on Nov 13, 2026, 3:49 AM UTC-08:00
- 主要语言
- Go
- 星标
- 5.6k
- 派生
- 615
- 平均合并
- 5 小时 44 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 808
环境准备
在浏览器里用你自己的 GitHub 账号启动这个项目的开发容器。
- 提供 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 没有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
github/gh-aw 的其他 Issue
-
agent-research
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 74/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
agentic-workflows automation code-quality cookie improvement quick-win task-mining
难度 2/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 76/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
cookie eslint
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
agentic-campaign automated-fix security z_campaign_security-alert-burndown
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 84/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
automated-analysis code-quality cookie testing
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 73/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
agent-butler-finding chore
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 88/100
jordansmall/spindrift#6695 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
skills-init: commit-SHA skill refs never start (git checkout -- <sha> reads the SHA as a pathspec)未关闭
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 84/100
kagent-dev/kagent#3571 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
book-layout.spec fails when the similar-books rail holds other projects' books可能已有人在做 @praetorianer777 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
praetorianer777/GoTome#373 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 80/100