Triage Agent Corrections

未关闭

#1,030 创建于 2026年4月7日 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度: 4/5
预计耗时: 3-5 天
新手友好度: 35/100

Issue 类型: 重构
描述清晰度: 需要澄清
活跃度: 冷清
技术栈: github-actions, markdown
领域: ci-cd, tooling

调研方向

在识别 agent 声明中的模式之前，先阅读链接的修正 issue 和原始 triage workflow。使用 agentic-workflows agent 了解约定，然后检查 .github/workflows/ 中相关的 .md 文件。完成意味着进行有针对性的 workflow 更改，在任何 YAML frontmatter 更改后更新 .lock.yml 文件，并创建一个引用此 issue 且包含修正摘要的 PR。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

triage-agent-tracking

Triage Agent Corrections

This issue tracks corrections to the triage agent system. When assigned to
Copilot, analyze the corrections and generate an improvement PR.

Instructions for Copilot

When assigned:

Read each linked correction comment and the original issue for full context
Identify patterns (e.g., the classifier frequently confuses X with Y)
Determine which workflow file(s) need improvement
Use the agentic-workflows agent in this repo for guidance on workflow syntax and conventions
Open a PR with targeted changes to the relevant .md workflow files in .github/workflows/
If you changed the YAML frontmatter (between the --- markers) of any workflow, run gh aw compile and commit the updated .lock.yml files. Changes to the markdown body (instructions) do NOT require recompilation.
Reference this issue in the PR description using Closes #<this issue number>
Include a summary of which corrections motivated each change

Corrections

Issue	Feedback	Submitted by	Date
[#1027] workspace.yaml missing git related info	Agent claims to have confirmed a bug, but does not show actual executable repro code. It also says "CLI likely" did something different in a prior version, but hasn't objectively confirmed this. As such the agent's output might all be wrong. The agent shouldn't tell us what will likely happen - it should create actual repro code and tell us what actually happens.	@SteveSandersonMS	2026-04-07
[#1042] Copilot CLI release/version mismatch makes Copi...	The agent shouldn't say "the behavior observed is a defect" because it hasn't actually observed that behavior itself. The agent should only make claims based on what it has been able to reproduce itself. Also from the "what I found" list, neither items 2 or 3 are bugs in any sense. All we're left with is speculation from the agent. A better conclusion from the agent in this case would be that it doesn't know.	@SteveSandersonMS	2026-04-09
[#1050] uvicorn main:app --reload	This is a clear case where the agent should have closed the issue. There's no feature request or bug report.	@SteveSandersonMS	2026-04-09
[#1052] API review and ongoing API quality controls	In this case since it's a work tracking issue posted by one of the project maintainers, you don't need to comment about it at all.	@SteveSandersonMS	2026-04-09
[#1064] [Bug] BYOK Anthropic provider missing multiple...	Agent claims "This is a confirmed bug." but I don't think it's possible for the agent to confirm this since it doesn't have a BYOK key for Anthropic. Agent should not claim it's confirmed something unless it does so empirically.	@SteveSandersonMS	2026-04-13
[#1146] Test harness CLI v1.0.32 incompatible with perm...	The agent claims to have investigated the issue and proposes a fix, but its fix is wrong (changing that package version will not affect the e2e test execution). So the agent must not have actually run the tests for real. The agent must not make claims about what works or doesn't work except exclusively by empirical observation.	@SteveSandersonMS	2026-04-28

主要语言: Java
星标: 10.5k
派生: 1.5k
平均合并: 1 天 9 小时
30 天内合并 PR: 130