Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

Triage Agent Corrections

Aperta
#1,030 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
4/5
Tempo stimato
3-5 giorni
Idoneità per principianti
35/100
Tipo di issue
Refactoring
Chiarezza
Da chiarire
Stato di attività
Tranquilla
Stack tecnologico
github-actions, markdown
Ambito
ci-cd, tooling

Direzione di ricerca

Leggi le issue di correzione collegate e i workflow originali di triage prima di identificare gli schemi nelle affermazioni dell’agente. Usa l’agente agentic-workflows per le convenzioni, quindi esamina i file .md pertinenti in .github/workflows/. Il lavoro è completo quando sono state apportate modifiche mirate ai workflow, i file .lock.yml sono stati aggiornati dopo qualsiasi modifica al frontmatter YAML ed è stata aperta una PR che fa riferimento a questa issue e include un riepilogo delle correzioni.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

triage-agent-tracking

Triage Agent Corrections

This issue tracks corrections to the triage agent system. When assigned to
Copilot, analyze the corrections and generate an improvement PR.

Instructions for Copilot

When assigned:

  1. Read each linked correction comment and the original issue for full context
  2. Identify patterns (e.g., the classifier frequently confuses X with Y)
  3. Determine which workflow file(s) need improvement
  4. Use the agentic-workflows agent in this repo for guidance on workflow syntax and conventions
  5. Open a PR with targeted changes to the relevant .md workflow files in .github/workflows/
  6. If you changed the YAML frontmatter (between the --- markers) of any workflow, run gh aw compile and commit the updated .lock.yml files. Changes to the markdown body (instructions) do NOT require recompilation.
  7. Reference this issue in the PR description using Closes #<this issue number>
  8. Include a summary of which corrections motivated each change

Corrections

Issue Feedback Submitted by Date
[#1027] workspace.yaml missing git related info Agent claims to have confirmed a bug, but does not show actual executable repro code. It also says "CLI likely" did something different in a prior version, but hasn't objectively confirmed this. As such the agent's output might all be wrong. The agent shouldn't tell us what will likely happen - it should create actual repro code and tell us what actually happens. @SteveSandersonMS 2026-04-07
[#1042] Copilot CLI release/version mismatch makes Copi... The agent shouldn't say "the behavior observed is a defect" because it hasn't actually observed that behavior itself. The agent should only make claims based on what it has been able to reproduce itself. Also from the "what I found" list, neither items 2 or 3 are bugs in any sense. All we're left with is speculation from the agent. A better conclusion from the agent in this case would be that it doesn't know. @SteveSandersonMS 2026-04-09
[#1050] uvicorn main:app --reload This is a clear case where the agent should have closed the issue. There's no feature request or bug report. @SteveSandersonMS 2026-04-09
[#1052] API review and ongoing API quality controls In this case since it's a work tracking issue posted by one of the project maintainers, you don't need to comment about it at all. @SteveSandersonMS 2026-04-09
[#1064] [Bug] BYOK Anthropic provider missing multiple... Agent claims "This is a confirmed bug." but I don't think it's possible for the agent to confirm this since it doesn't have a BYOK key for Anthropic. Agent should not claim it's confirmed something unless it does so empirically. @SteveSandersonMS 2026-04-13
[#1146] Test harness CLI v1.0.32 incompatible with perm... The agent claims to have investigated the issue and proposes a fix, but its fix is wrong (changing that package version will not affect the e2e test execution). So the agent must not have actually run the tests for real. The agent must not make claims about what works or doesn't work except exclusively by empirical observation. @SteveSandersonMS 2026-04-28
Lingua principale
Java
Stelle
10.5k
Fork
1.5k
Merge medio
1g 9h
PR unite (30g)
130

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di github/copilot-sdk

Tutte le issue di github/copilot-sdk

Issue simili

Altre issue su Java

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.