Create documentation/vignette for the naming scheme of our functions

未关闭
#520 1 条评论 1 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
35/100
Issue 类型
文档
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
r
领域
documentation

调研方向

首先,将此 issue 中描述的命名约定与 package 当前的函数和类进行比较,尤其是 scoring rules、get_ functions、plotting functions、add_ functions 和 input checks。与 maintainers 确认哪些指导仍然适用,然后创建计划中的 vignette,记录已达成一致的方案及其示例。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

help wanted question

Edit: Warning - this might be partly outdated.

We should aim for as much consistency as possible in naming things.

This issue summarises our current thinking and should eventually become a Vignette

Scoring rules

See #476 #610.

We call "scoring rule" any function that computes a score / metric / quantity of interest based on forecasts and observed values. We call "score" the output of a scoring rule.

"Scoring rule" usually means the specific R function that computes a score. We use sentences such as "you can pass a list of scoring rules to score(), or "you can call a scoring rule directly". And "scores are computed by scoring rules". Sometimes, "scoring rule" can also denote the function in a more abstract, mathematical sense. For example we would say "the absolute error is a scoring rule" or the "CRPS" is a proper scoring rule. Sometimes we use "rules" as short for "scoring rules", for example when naming function arguments.

In other contexts in the literature, "score" is also used as short for "scoring rule", for example in a sentence like "the CRPS is a proper score". We will avoid this terminology.

Scoring rules are consistently named in the following way:
<name of the scoring rule> + _ + <forecast type>

If there is only one forecast type for which a scoring rule is applicable, _ + <forecast type> is sometimes omitted.

get_-functions

  • functions with the prefix get_ are designed to provide additional information based on the data
  • they are usually called on the raw forecasts

Classes

We have one class for every forecast type

  • forecast_binary
  • forecast_point
  • forecast_sample
  • forecast_quantile

We have a class for the output of score():

  • score

Plotting functions

We briefly considered having classes solely for plotting (with the class named after the function). But then we decided to instead have dedicated plotting functions.

Plotting functions are named plot_ + name of function. If the function name has a prefix like get_, then that is replaced with plot_.
Examples: plot_forecast_counts, plot_correlation, plot_pairwise_comparion.

add_-functions

Functions with an add_ prefix add columns with additional information to their inputs.
add_pairwise_comparison()
add_coverage()
add_interval_range()

Internal input checks

check_, assert_, test_

  • assert_: Returns NULL invisibly if the assertion was successful and throws an error otherwise.
  • check_: Returns TRUE if the check was successful and a string with an error message otherwise
  • test_: Returns TRUE if the check was successful and FALSE otherwise
主要语言
R
星标
65
派生
24
平均合并
1 小时 24 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
2

环境准备

在 Codespaces 中打开

在浏览器里用你自己的 GitHub 账号启动这个项目的开发容器。

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

epiforecasts/scoringutils 的其他 Issue

查看 epiforecasts/scoringutils 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 R Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。