State explicitly that "free to use, including for commercial [...] work" is not subject to a # employees or revenue threshold, unlike Docker Desktop

未关闭 适合新手
#26,563 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
1/5
预计耗时
1 小时以内
新手友好度
92/100
Issue 类型
文档
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
docker
领域
documentation

调研方向

从 docs.docker.com/ai/sandboxes/faq/ 的 FAQ 页面开始,找到说明 sbx CLI 和本地沙盒计算资源可免费用于商业和专业工作的句子。明确说明该优惠没有公司规模或年收入门槛。页面明确写出这一点后即算完成。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

status/triage
Is this a docs issue?
  • My issue is about the documentation content or website
Type of issue

There's a problem with the website

Description

This sentence in the documentation is not as clear as it could be:

The sbx CLI and local sandbox compute are free to use, including for commercial and professional work.

Rationale
The current phrasing relies on omission to convey that Docker Desktop's 250-employee / $10M revenue limits do not apply here. This creates uncertainty for corporate legal and procurement teams.

This ambiguity is compounded by the fact that sbx requires signing into a Docker account, which enterprise developers naturally associate with commercial license tier enforcement. Explicitly clarifying that no size or revenue thresholds apply will eliminate needless legal friction.

Location

https://docs.docker.com/ai/sandboxes/faq/

Suggestion

The sbx CLI and local sandbox compute are free to use, including for commercial and professional work, regardless of company size or annual revenue.

主要语言
Markdown
星标
4.7k
派生
8.5k
平均合并
2 天 8 小时
30 天内合并 PR
133

环境准备

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

docker/docs 的其他 Issue

查看 docker/docs 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Documentation Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。