[docs-scanner] Unclear policy change timing in organization policies overview
维护者通常 1 天内回复
评估
- 难度
- 1/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-3 小时
- 新手友好度
- 89/100
- Issue 类型
- 文档
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- markdown
调研方向
Issue 指出了 content/manuals/ai/governance/organization/policies/_index.md 以及链接的 network.md、filesystem.md 和 mcp.md 页面。阅读概述部分以及三个 “When changes take effect” 部分,以核实对时间的描述。更新概述,明确同步最多需要五分钟,且策略类型决定评估时间点;完成标准是内容不再暗示存在额外延迟。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
File: content/manuals/ai/governance/organization/policies/_index.md
Issue
The "When policy changes reach developers" section creates confusion about timing by stating:
Policy changes reach developer machines within 5 minutes. When a synced change takes effect also depends on the policy type.
This phrasing suggests there are two separate delays: (1) a 5-minute sync delay, and (2) an additional type-specific delay after syncing. However, the individual policy pages all describe immediate effect after the sync completes:
- network.md: "Once a policy change has synced to the developer's machine, it applies immediately to subsequent requests."
- filesystem.md: "Once a policy change has synced to the developer's machine, it applies the next time a sandbox starts."
- mcp.md: "Once a policy change has synced to the developer's machine, use-time rules apply to subsequent governed MCP requests."
Why this matters
Readers trying to understand when their policy changes will take effect are left uncertain whether there's a 5-minute delay plus additional waiting, or just the 5-minute sync delay. The phrase "When a synced change takes effect also depends on the policy type" implies additional delays beyond syncing, but the linked pages describe only the sync delay.
Suggested fix
Clarify that the 5-minute sync is the only delay, and that "when it takes effect" refers to the evaluation point (per-request vs. sandbox start), not an additional delay. For example:
Policy changes reach developer machines within 5 minutes. Once synced, when the change applies depends on the policy type: network and MCP policies apply to subsequent requests, while filesystem policies apply when a sandbox starts.
Or link directly to the specific sections without the ambiguous "also depends" phrasing:
Policy changes reach developer machines within 5 minutes. For when changes apply after syncing, see Organization network access policies, Organization filesystem access policies, and Organization MCP access policies.
Found by nightly documentation quality scanner
- 主要语言
- Markdown
- 星标
- 4.7k
- 派生
- 8.5k
- 平均合并
- 2 天 13 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 139
环境准备
- 提供 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
docker/docs 的其他 Issue
-
[docs-scanner] Confusing explanation of approval-required outcome vs permit in MCP policy可能已有人在做 关联的 PR 仍在进行中或已合并。 未关闭
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 88/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
[docs-scanner] Contradictory information about MCP approval fields in audit records可能已有人在做 关联的 PR 仍在进行中或已合并。 未关闭
难度 1/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 88/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
status/triage
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 68/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
[docs-scanner] Unclear pronoun reference in cloud delivery note可能已有人在做 @craig-osterhout 于 1 天前认领。 未关闭
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 94/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Debian installation pitfall可能已有人在做 @Duo-ee 于 7 天前认领。 未关闭status/triage
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 85/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
aws-samples/sample-per-model-bedrock#795 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
documentation easy good first issue help wanted
难度 1/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 83/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 74/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Billion-context documentation addendum: nudge is independent of window occupancy. | billion-context 文档补充:nudge 与窗口占用无关可能已有人在做 关联的 PR 仍在进行中或已合并。 未关闭
难度 1/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 86/100
ranxianglei/billion-context#5893 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 74/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复