Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Stale kusari-oss references: signing identities, container image name, package metadata

未关闭
#583 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
3/5
预计耗时
1-2 天
新手友好度
55/100
Issue 类型
文档
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
docker, github-actions, python

调研方向

Start with packaging/README.md, which states the identity rule, and .github/workflows/release.yml, which sets the GHCR image name. The section 4 items in docs/install/from-source.md (line 11 clone URL, lines 25 and 35 control count, checked against darnit list) are the most self-contained place to start. Sections 1 and 2 need the maintainers' answer first. Done means the stale references are updated where the issue asks, the Homebrew tap and DEFAULT_TRUSTED_PUBLISHERS stay unchanged, and the git grep count is re-run.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

needs triage

Summary

171 references to kusari-oss remain in 35 files under docs/, packaging/, README.md, the pyproject.toml files and the workflows. Most are links that GitHub redirects. Some ae not harmless, and with 0.2.0 coming it seemed worth sorting them.

packaging/README.md already states the rule: "Sigstore certificate identities do not redirect", releases cut after the move resolve against darnitdevorg/darnit, and two things stay under the old org on purpose (the Homebrew tap and the kusari-oss entry in DEFAULT_TRUSTED_PUBLISHERS).

1. Signing identities in user-facing verification commands

These tell users to verify against the old identity:

  • docs/install/README.md:47, :53
  • docs/install/binary.md:43
  • docs/install/container.md:49, :74
  • docs/install/pypi.md:76 (fixed by #530, still open)
  • packaging/RECOVERY.md:149, :155, :242
  • packaging/container/README.md:65

A user who follows them for a release signed under darnitdevorg/darnit gets a verification failure on a genuine artifact.

Question: the examples all use v0.1.0. If 0.1.0 was published before the move, the old identity is correct for that version. Should the docs move to the new identity with a newer example version, or state which identity applies to which versions?

2. Container image name

release.yml pushes to ghcr.io/${{ github.repository_owner }}/darnit, which is now ghcr.io/darnitdevorg/darnit. docs/install/container.md, packaging/container/README.md and packaging/RECOVERY.md use ghcr.io/kusari-oss/darnit throughout (pull, run, cosign verify, cosign download attestation).

I do not think GHCR redirects image names between organizations, so these would not find new releases. I have not tested it.

3. Package metadata

pyproject.toml (root and packages/*) set Homepage, Repository and Issues to https://github.com/kusari-oss/darnit. They redirect, but they are what PyPI will show for 0.2.0.

4. docs/install/from-source.md

  • Line 11 clones https://github.com/kusari-oss/darnit (redirects).
  • Lines 25 and 35 say the baseline has 62 controls. darnit list reports 66.

5. Plain links

Release download URLs, issue links and the like, across the install docs, README.md, docs/SECURITY_GUIDE.md and docs/getting-started/. They redirect. Low priority.

Deliberate, not to change

  • kusari-oss/homebrew-tap and brew tap kusari-oss/tap, including the three references in release-smoke.yml.
  • The kusari-oss entry in DEFAULT_TRUSTED_PUBLISHERS.

Suggested order

1, 2 and 3 before 0.2.0 is published. 4 and 5 whenever.

I can send PRs for any of these once the question in section 1 is answered. Context: this is the follow-up I mentioned in #530.

Counted on main at 24a4fed with git grep -c kusari-oss -- docs/ packaging/ README.md pyproject.toml 'packages/*/pyproject.toml' '.github/workflows/*.yml'.

Drafted with Claude; reviewed and filed by me.

主要语言
Python
星标
22
派生
27
平均合并
1 天 20 小时
30 天内合并 PR
39

环境准备

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

darnitdevorg/darnit 的其他 Issue

查看 darnitdevorg/darnit 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。