Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Code fences and backtick strings are not fully disambiguated

未关闭
#800 3 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
25/100
Issue 类型
文档
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
markdown
领域
documentation

调研方向

Read the CommonMark specification sections covering fenced code blocks and code spans, then reproduce cases 1–4 in the dingus. The issue is complete when the precedence rules are resolved and the specification or examples make the expected interpretation unambiguous.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

consider the following cases:

1 ```

2 ``` 222 ```

According the dingus, 1 is a code fence that is not part of a fenced code block, and 2 is a code span.

Reading through the spec, it's not clear why this is, or why the following couldn't be interpreted as a code span:

3 ```
333
```

after all, this is a valid code span:

4 ``
444
``

If this is because "block structures take precedence over inline structures", and because code fences are a separate AST element that can exist detached from a code block, then why is 2 not parsed as two code fences? the spec does not say that a line cannot contain 2 code fences.

主要语言
Python
星标
5.2k
派生
360
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

环境准备

这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南,环境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

commonmark/commonmark-spec 的其他 Issue

查看 commonmark/commonmark-spec 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。