Hacktoberfest 2026：维护者为十月标记出来的 issue，仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Android: List.of() (API 30+) used in core since 0.24.0 contradicts the README's "minimum API level is 19"

未关闭
  • 哪里不对？
#457 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
74/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
android, java
领域
mobile-dev

调研方向

首先检查 commonmark 模块中列出的 List.of、Set.of 和 Map.of 用法，以及 .github/workflows/ci.yml 中的 Android 测试设置。在不使用 core library desugaring 的情况下复现 API 24–29 的失败，然后验证所选解决方案是否能使 README、运行时行为和 Android 支持预期保持一致。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Summary

Since 0.24.0 the core commonmark module uses java.util.List.of(...) (and a few Set.of/Map.of). On Android these methods exist only from API 30 (Android 11). The README still says:

It works on Android too, but that is on a best-effort basis, please report problems. For Android the minimum API level is 19

An app with minSdk < 30 that does not enable core library desugaring crashes on the first parse on API < 30 devices:

java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: No static method of(Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/util/List;
    at org.commonmark.internal.InlineParserImpl.parse(InlineParserImpl.java)

This is the same class of problem as #366 / #373 (Objects.requireNonNullElseGet, fixed by #369). The List.of usages were introduced deliberately in #322 as a Java 11 clean-up, so this is a report that the clean-up and the Android support statement now disagree — not a claim that the change was wrong.

Steps to reproduce

Android app, minSdk 24, no coreLibraryDesugaring, org.commonmark:commonmark:0.30.0, run on an API 24–29 emulator:

Parser.builder().build().parse("*a*")   // NoSuchMethodError: List.of

With isCoreLibraryDesugaringEnabled = true + com.android.tools:desugar_jdk_libs:2.1.5 the same code works on API 24 (verified on an API 24 emulator).

Where the API 30+ calls live (0.30.0, commonmark module)

List.of / Set.of / Map.of occurrences by file:

File Count
internal/InlineParserImpl.java 8
renderer/markdown/CoreMarkdownNodeRenderer.java 3
renderer/html/CoreHtmlNodeRenderer.java 3
parser/Parser.java 3 (incl. Javadoc example)
internal/ParagraphParser.java 2
internal/IndentedCodeBlockParser.java 2
renderer/text/CoreTextContentNodeRenderer.java, renderer/markdown/MarkdownRenderer.java, renderer/html/HtmlWriter.java, renderer/html/DefaultUrlSanitizer.java, parser/block/AbstractBlockParser.java, node/SourceSpans.java 1 each

0.22.0 had none; 0.24.0 introduced 8 in InlineParserImpl.

Why CI did not catch it

commonmark-android-test is only run through ./gradlew :app:lint in .github/workflows/ci.yml (minSdk 19, no emulator run), so a runtime NoSuchMethodError never surfaces there.

Possible resolutions

Either would be fine from a consumer's point of view — the important part is that the README and the code agree:

  1. Keep API 19 support — replace the factory calls with Java 8 equivalents (Collections.emptyList() / singletonList(x) / unmodifiableList(Arrays.asList(a, b)), same for Set/Map). Mechanical, ~26 sites, keeps immutability. I can send a PR if you want this.
  2. Document the new requirement — state in the README that Android needs API 30+ or core library desugaring, and ideally have commonmark-android-test run on an emulator (or fail lint on NewApi) so future regressions are visible.

Context: I hit this while building an Android Markdown renderer on top of commonmark-java (https://github.com/Jimmy-Jung/RichMarkdown-Android). We chose minSdk 30 for now, so this is not blocking us — reporting because the README statement is likely to mislead other Android users.

主要语言
Java
星标
2.7k
派生
337
平均合并
15 天 9 小时
30 天内合并 PR
1

环境准备

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 阅读贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

commonmark/commonmark-java 的其他 Issue

查看 commonmark/commonmark-java 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Java Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。