credential provider follow-ups: name collisions, vendor change, and an untested secret-delete risk
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 新手友好度
- 35/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- aws, typescript
- 领域
- cloud, infrastructure
调研方向
在 refactor 分支上工作,从 src/assets/cdk/lib/cdk-stack.ts、AgentCoreCredentialProvider.ts、删除处理程序和 src/projectSchemas/credential.ts 开始。首先分离四个未决问题,并复现 secretRef 的堆栈删除场景;将 provider 命名和 vendor 变更行为与已声明的约束进行比较。完成的标准是每个问题都有已实现的解决方案或已确认的测试结果,并覆盖相关的部署路径。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Status
The drop bug is fixed by #2089, which creates credential providers in CloudFormation. Two of the six open questions below are answered; four are still open. This issue now tracks those four.
The original bug
On the refactor branch, agentcore project deploy silently ignored any credential declared in agentcore.json — the provider was never created and the deploy reported success:
$ agentcore project add credentials api-key --name openai-key
$ agentcore project deploy
...
Deployed project 'Example' to target 'default' # exit 0
$ agentcore identity api-key-credential-provider get --name openai-key
Error: ApiKeyCredentialProvider not found for openai-key
The vended CDK app expected provider ARNs to already be recorded in agentcore/.cli/deployed-state.json (src/assets/cdk/bin/cdk.ts, read inside a try/catch that tolerated absence). Nothing in the deploy path wrote that file, so the credentials map was always undefined and every declaration fell on the floor — silently, because the read tolerated a missing file.
Not in main; refactor only.
How #2089 fixes it
src/assets/cdk/lib/cdk-stack.ts creates a provider for each declared credential using the constructs from L3 #333. Payment connectors now carry the credential's name and the stack resolves it to the ARN of the provider it created, which removed the last reader of deployed-state.json.
Answered: .env.local secrets are neither plaintext nor EXTERNAL
The original framing offered two options and both were bad. There is a third, which is what L3 #333 built for: the provider is created with CREDENTIAL_SECRET_PLACEHOLDER, and the CLI replaces it over the Identity API once the deploy succeeds. Real secret material never enters the template. A credential with a secretRef/clientSecretRef deploys as EXTERNAL and needs no sync.
One correction to the L3's own docstring, which suggests detecting an unsynced provider by finding the placeholder still in place: that is not implementable. ApiKey is a CloudFormation write-only property and GetApiKeyCredentialProvider returns only apiKeySecretArn — there is nothing to read back and compare. #2089 therefore syncs unconditionally on every deploy, at the cost of a new secret version each time.
Answered: secret rotation
Moot under the placeholder design. The template never carries the real key, so a stack update cannot overwrite a rotated secret with a stale one. If CloudFormation does update the resource for some other reason, it writes the placeholder and the post-deploy sync immediately replaces it.
Still open
1. Provider names are not scoped to a project, so stacks collide
AgentCoreApiKeyCredentialProvider sets the CFN Name to the bare credential name (AgentCoreCredentialProvider.ts:47, :116) — projectName only feeds tags. Names are unique per (account, region, token vault), so:
- two projects in one account+region both declaring
openai-keycollide - two targets of one project in the same region collide — each target gets its own stack, and both try to create the same provider name
The imperative prototype reused an existing provider, so this used to be silent sharing; under CloudFormation the second stack fails with AlreadyExists. A hard failure is the better default, but it is a behaviour change and it makes a same-region two-target project undeployable.
Needs either a naming strategy (project- or target-scoped names, which changes what users pass to agentcore identity ...) or CFN resource import for adoption. The L3's ExternallyManagedStateSchema covers only customJwtAuthorizer and vpcConfig, so there is no existing escape hatch.
2. Changing a vendor is a replacement into a name collision
CredentialProviderVendor is create-only on OAuth2 and Payment, and Name is create-only too. Changing a credential's vendor while keeping its name makes CloudFormation replace the resource with one claiming a name still held by the resource being replaced. Needs a guard that refuses the edit with an actionable message.
3. Unverified: does deleting a stack destroy a customer-owned secret?
The delete handler lists secretsmanager:DeleteSecret unconditionally. If that applies to an EXTERNAL secret, deleting a stack destroys a secret the customer owns and manages elsewhere. Still untested.
This is now cheap to test: deploy a project with a secretRef credential, delete the stack, and check whether the referenced secret survives. Worth doing before refactor ships — it is the highest-severity unknown left here.
4. CredentialNameSchema.min(3)
Still a workaround for the pinned L3 rejecting shorter names at build (src/projectSchemas/credential.ts). Since we maintain the L3, align it and drop back to 1.
Moved out
Payment credential providers are tracked in #2095. project deploy refuses them with an explicit error rather than half-creating one; that issue covers both the Quick Create path (needs no provider, already released in L3 alpha.49 via L3 #324) and the Manual path's schema gap.
Reference, still accurate
- CloudFormation support:
ApiKeyCredentialProvider,OAuth2CredentialProviderandPaymentCredentialProviderare allLIVEandFULLY_MUTABLEin theus-east-1registry. OnAWS::BedrockAgentCore::ApiKeyCredentialProvider:readOnlyPropertiesincludeCredentialProviderArnandApiKeySecretArn;writeOnlyPropertiesareApiKey,ApiKeySecretConfig,ApiKeySecretSource;createOnlyPropertiesisName. - The L3 tolerates a CDK token for a credential ARN.
CredentialDeployedStateSchema.credentialProviderArnis a barez.string(), and all consumption sites pass it straight into a CFN property or a truthiness check — no.split/.match/.slice/.startsWith/.replaceon a credential ARN anywhere. IAM grants are built from the credential name plus partition/region/account, never by parsing the ARN. So no L3 schema change was needed. OAuth2CredentialProviderdiffers in shape:ClientSecretSourceis read-only at the top level, so the secret config lives insideOauth2ProviderConfigInput. All 9 vendor configs supportClientSecretConfig+ClientSecretSource.CustomOauth2ProviderConfigInputrequiresOauthDiscoveryand has noScopesfield, which is why a spec'sscopesare consumed where the credential is used, not where the provider is made.
- 主要语言
- TypeScript
- 星标
- 304
- 派生
- 105
- 平均合并
- 16 小时 14 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 186
环境准备
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
aws/agentcore-cli 的其他 Issue
-
`agentcore dev` container fails with LoginTokenLoadError when using `aws login` credentials可能已有人在做 关联的 PR 仍在进行中或已合并。 未关闭bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 80/100
aws/agentcore-cli#2606 · 4 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
aws/agentcore-cli#2538 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
[Refactor] project add credentials payment does not match Connector regex可能已有人在做 关联的 PR 仍在进行中或已合并。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
aws/agentcore-cli#2533 · 3 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 78/100
aws/agentcore-cli#2520 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug(policy): add policy --target generates an undeployable Cedar statement (wrong action id suffix, resource scope not narrowed)可能已有人在做 @rksharma-owg 于 22 天前认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
aws/agentcore-cli#2395 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 aws/agentcore-cli 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
simkimsia/netlify-axi#19 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
subhranshudash13-dotcom/Contribo#74 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
enhancement frontend good first issue Stellar Wave trivial
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
Godgift-care/sci-healthcare-frontend#166 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
backend good first issue security Stellar Wave trivial
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
Godgift-care/sci-healthcare-backend#171 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复