Support the /+esm endpoint on jsDelivr packages
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 42/100
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 技术栈
- csharp, javascript, rollup
调研方向
No files or tests are named. Start by locating LibMan's provider parsing and jsDelivr download handling, then review how library and file paths are resolved. Done means an agreed /+esm form can fetch package and individual-file ESM endpoints with coverage for the supported syntax.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Some libraries available through jsDelivr have no default JS file specified by the package author. Libraries packaged for NPM are often meant to be included as CJS modules, with the expectation that the developer will use a tool like webpack or Rollup.js to prepare the code to run client-side. On jsDelivr packages sometimes have this disclaimer under the "install" code snippet:
No default JS file set by the package author so the URL is guessed. You can always browse all package files to use another one.
Luckily jsDelivr provides a more reliable option - fetching the library as an ES module, as illustrated in this example:
<script type="module">
import coreJs from 'https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/core-js@3.45.0/+esm'
</script>
jsDelivr uses Rollup.js to generate the ESM version of the package and exposes the result when it sees /+esm appended to the URL. This is a very helpful feature provided by the CDN, but as far as I can tell there is currently no way to leverage this feature with LibMan.
Describe the solution you'd like
It would be a nice convenience if there was some way to tell LibMan to fetch pre-bundled libraries from jsDelivr. I think the simplest syntax for this would be:
{
"provider": "jsdelivr/esm",
"library": "core-js@3.45.0",
"destination": "wwwroot/lib/core-js/index.mjs"
}
The file name, [library name]/index.mjs, could be inferred, though I believe that is a separate issue.
Describe alternatives you've considered
I did try "tricking" LibMan into fetching a generated ESM for me with something like this:
{
"provider": "jsdelivr",
"library": "core-js@3.45.0",
"files": [ "/+esm" ]
}
Of course, that doesn't work because there is no literal "/+esm" file in this package. A more sensible and straightforward alternative syntax might be:
{
"provider": "jsdelivr",
"library": "core-js@3.45.0/+esm"
}
Additional context
I've found a few examples, like parse and locutus, where the /+esm endpoint is the only install option shown on the download page.
Locutus is an odd example, because the package contains a very large collection of submodules. I've found that jsDelivr supports a form of tree shaking by allowing /+esm to be appended to individual files in the library:
<script type="module">
import pcre from 'https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/locutus@2.0.32/php/pcre/+esm'
import sprintf from 'https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/locutus@2.0.32/php/strings/sprintf.js/+esm'
</script>
LibMan might be able to take advantage of this feature as well:
{
"provider": "jsdelivr/esm",
"library": "locutus@2.0.32",
"destination": "wwwroot/lib/locutus",
"files": [
"/php/pcre/index.js",
"/php/strings/sprintf.js"
]
}
- 主要语言
- C#
- 星标
- 486
- 派生
- 91
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
aspnet/LibraryManager 的其他 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
aspnet/LibraryManager#824 · 1 条评论 · 3 个 reaction ·
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 68/100
aspnet/LibraryManager#804 · 2 个 reaction ·
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 48/100
aspnet/LibraryManager#829 · 1 条评论 · 3 个 reaction ·
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 42/100
aspnet/LibraryManager#820 ·
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 35/100
aspnet/LibraryManager#808 · 5 条评论 ·
查看 aspnet/LibraryManager 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
untriaged
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 88/100
dotnet/dotnet-api-docs#13095 ·
-
area-deployment area-integrations triage:bot-seen
难度 2/5 半天 新手友好度 86/100
-
type/automation type/tech-debt
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
-
bug
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 90/100
newrelic/newrelic-dotnet-agent#3850 · 1 条评论 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 88/100
LuckyPennySoftware/AutoMapper#4660 ·