Support the /+esm endpoint on jsDelivr packages
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 42/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Stack tecnológico
- csharp, javascript, rollup
- Área
- developer-experience, tooling
Línea de trabajo
No files or tests are named. Start by locating LibMan's provider parsing and jsDelivr download handling, then review how library and file paths are resolved. Done means an agreed /+esm form can fetch package and individual-file ESM endpoints with coverage for the supported syntax.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Some libraries available through jsDelivr have no default JS file specified by the package author. Libraries packaged for NPM are often meant to be included as CJS modules, with the expectation that the developer will use a tool like webpack or Rollup.js to prepare the code to run client-side. On jsDelivr packages sometimes have this disclaimer under the "install" code snippet:
No default JS file set by the package author so the URL is guessed. You can always browse all package files to use another one.
Luckily jsDelivr provides a more reliable option - fetching the library as an ES module, as illustrated in this example:
<script type="module">
import coreJs from 'https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/core-js@3.45.0/+esm'
</script>
jsDelivr uses Rollup.js to generate the ESM version of the package and exposes the result when it sees /+esm appended to the URL. This is a very helpful feature provided by the CDN, but as far as I can tell there is currently no way to leverage this feature with LibMan.
Describe the solution you'd like
It would be a nice convenience if there was some way to tell LibMan to fetch pre-bundled libraries from jsDelivr. I think the simplest syntax for this would be:
{
"provider": "jsdelivr/esm",
"library": "core-js@3.45.0",
"destination": "wwwroot/lib/core-js/index.mjs"
}
The file name, [library name]/index.mjs, could be inferred, though I believe that is a separate issue.
Describe alternatives you've considered
I did try "tricking" LibMan into fetching a generated ESM for me with something like this:
{
"provider": "jsdelivr",
"library": "core-js@3.45.0",
"files": [ "/+esm" ]
}
Of course, that doesn't work because there is no literal "/+esm" file in this package. A more sensible and straightforward alternative syntax might be:
{
"provider": "jsdelivr",
"library": "core-js@3.45.0/+esm"
}
Additional context
I've found a few examples, like parse and locutus, where the /+esm endpoint is the only install option shown on the download page.
Locutus is an odd example, because the package contains a very large collection of submodules. I've found that jsDelivr supports a form of tree shaking by allowing /+esm to be appended to individual files in the library:
<script type="module">
import pcre from 'https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/locutus@2.0.32/php/pcre/+esm'
import sprintf from 'https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/locutus@2.0.32/php/strings/sprintf.js/+esm'
</script>
LibMan might be able to take advantage of this feature as well:
{
"provider": "jsdelivr/esm",
"library": "locutus@2.0.32",
"destination": "wwwroot/lib/locutus",
"files": [
"/php/pcre/index.js",
"/php/strings/sprintf.js"
]
}
- Lenguaje dominante
- C#
- Estrellas
- 486
- Forks
- 91
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de aspnet/LibraryManager
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
aspnet/LibraryManager#824 · 1 comentario · 3 reacciones ·
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
aspnet/LibraryManager#804 · 2 reacciones ·
-
Changelog for 3.0.114 Abierto
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
aspnet/LibraryManager#829 · 1 comentario · 3 reacciones ·
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 42/100
aspnet/LibraryManager#820 ·
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
aspnet/LibraryManager#808 · 5 comentarios ·
Todos los issues de aspnet/LibraryManager
Issues similares
-
CS0162 "Unreachable code detected" warning from a MSBuildTemp .tmp file in every game project Abiertobug
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 90/100
-
Type: enhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
apache/arrow-adbc#4809 ·
-
type/automation type/tech-debt
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
microsoft/vscode-azurefunctions#5197 · 1 comentario ·
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
microsoft/microsoft-ui-reactor#1274 ·