_DeleteFiles.delete_data_file() silently drops explicit file references
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
调研方向
从 pyiceberg/table/update/snapshot.py 中 _DeleteFiles._compute_deletes 的大约第 598 行开始,跟踪 delete_data_file() 如何记录显式指定的文件。运行 issue 中的复现,然后验证显式引用的数据文件会在 commit 后被删除,同时基于 predicate 的删除仍然有效。当表为空而不是保留 [1, 2, 3] 时,即表示完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Description
_DeleteFiles.delete_data_file() silently drops explicit file references because _compute_deletes resets self._deleted_data_files = set() before scanning manifests by predicate.
The delete_data_file() method is inherited from _SnapshotProducer and adds to self._deleted_data_files. However, when _DeleteFiles._compute_deletes runs (triggered by _deleted_entries()), it resets this field to an empty set and repopulates it only from files matched by the predicate evaluator. Any explicitly added files are silently lost.
While the high-level table.delete() API only uses predicates (so this isn't hit in normal usage), the low-level update_snapshot().delete() API exposes delete_data_file() as a public method. Calling it produces no error and no effect.
Reproduction
import pyarrow as pa
from pyiceberg.catalog import load_catalog
from pyiceberg.schema import Schema
from pyiceberg.types import LongType, NestedField
catalog = load_catalog("default")
catalog.create_namespace("default")
table = catalog.create_table(
"default.delete_explicit",
Schema(NestedField(1, "x", LongType(), required=False)),
)
table.append(pa.table({"x": [1, 2, 3]}))
data_file = next(iter(table.scan().plan_files())).file
# This should delete the file but silently does nothing
with table.transaction() as tx:
delete_snapshot = tx.update_snapshot().delete()
delete_snapshot.delete_data_file(data_file)
# Bug: table still has [1, 2, 3]
print(table.scan().to_arrow()["x"].to_pylist())
Expected: table is empty after commit.
Actual: table still has [1, 2, 3].
Root cause
In pyiceberg/table/update/snapshot.py, _DeleteFiles._compute_deletes (line ~598):
self._deleted_data_files = set() # <-- overwrites any explicit files added via delete_data_file()
Then it repopulates from predicate matches only. Since no predicate was set (AlwaysFalse by default), nothing matches, nothing is deleted.
Suggested fix
Before resetting, preserve explicit files and include them in the deletion scan:
# Preserve files explicitly requested for deletion
explicit_deletes = set(self._deleted_data_files)
self._deleted_data_files = set()
# ... existing predicate-based scan ...
# After the scan, also mark explicitly requested files as deleted:
for entry in manifest_entries:
if entry.data_file in explicit_deletes:
# mark as deleted
Alternatively, prevent calling delete_data_file() on _DeleteFiles entirely by raising NotImplementedError.
Related
Follow-up observation from #3818 review. The _OverwriteFiles path handles delete_data_file() correctly because it does not reset the field.
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 1.1k
- 派生
- 589
- 平均合并
- 2 天 2 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 70
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
apache/iceberg-python 的其他 Issue
-
kind:bug
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 92/100
apache/iceberg-python#4006 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
apache/iceberg-python#3996 ·
-
bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
apache/iceberg-python#3979 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
apache/iceberg-python#3885 ·
-
[Bug] PyArrowFileIO fails to propagate s3.ssl.ca-cert to pyarrow.fs.S3FileSystem tls_ca_file_path 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
apache/iceberg-python#3866 · 1 条评论 ·
查看 apache/iceberg-python 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
anthropics/skills#1811 · 1 条评论 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
speaches-ai/speaches#678 ·
-
bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
datalayer/mcp-compose#42 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
conda-forge/spacy-feedstock#177 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals#2523 ·