Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

[Vector] Sparse UnionVector re-serialization rewrites schema type ids to MinorType ordinals, breaking cross-implementation interop

未关闭
#1,308 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
45/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
java

调研方向

The issue is in UnionVector's getField() method, which incorrectly uses MinorType ordinals for type ids. Start by examining the UnionVector class and its getField() implementation. Look at how type ids are derived during serialization. The failing test case is provided; run it to reproduce the error. Check the ArrowType.Union handling and the interaction with Types.MinorType. The fix should ensure wire type ids are preserved in the schema.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Summary

Reading a spec-canonical sparse union produced by another Arrow implementation and then re-serializing it through arrow-java rewrites the schema's union type ids from the wire values [0, 1] to the Types.MinorType ordinals [24, 3], while the types (type-id) buffer is left unchanged at [0, 1]. The result is a self-inconsistent union: the buffer selects type id 0, which no longer appears in the field's declared type ids {24, 3}.

Strict Arrow consumers reject the output. Arrow C++/pyarrow RecordBatch.validate(full=True) fails with:

Invalid: In column 0: Invalid: Union value at position 0 has invalid type id 0

(Some readers, e.g. DuckDB, tolerate it by treating the type-id buffer positionally, which masks the problem until a strict consumer sees it.)

Version and platform
  • Reproduced on arrow-java 18.1.0 and 19.0.0 (OpenJDK 25.0.2, macOS arm64). Confirmed still present after upgrading our stack to 19.0.0 — the round-trip produces the same [24, 3] schema type ids over a [0, 1] type-id buffer.

(An earlier revision of this report briefly retracted the 19.0.0 claim while our build was still transitively pulling 18.1.0; a real 19.0.0 build has since confirmed it reproduces.)

Steps to reproduce (pure arrow-java, no third-party runtime)

The input is a canonical sparse union sparse_union<name: string=0, age: int16=1> with a 2-row type-id buffer [0, 1], produced by pyarrow and serialized to an Arrow IPC stream (base64 below). arrow-java reads it, transfers the vectors into a fresh root (a generic pass-through), and writes it back:

byte[] input = Base64.getDecoder().decode(CANONICAL_UNION_IPC_B64);
try (BufferAllocator alloc = new RootAllocator()) {
  VectorSchemaRoot outRoot;
  try (ArrowStreamReader reader = new ArrowStreamReader(new ByteArrayInputStream(input), alloc)) {
    reader.loadNextBatch();
    VectorSchemaRoot in = reader.getVectorSchemaRoot();
    ArrowType.Union inType = (ArrowType.Union) in.getSchema().getFields().get(0).getType();
    System.out.println("INPUT  Union.typeIds = " + Arrays.toString(inType.getTypeIds())); // [0, 1]

    List<FieldVector> moved = new ArrayList<>();
    for (FieldVector v : in.getFieldVectors()) {
      TransferPair tp = v.getTransferPair(alloc);
      tp.transfer();
      moved.add((FieldVector) tp.getTo());
    }
    outRoot = new VectorSchemaRoot(moved);
    outRoot.setRowCount(in.getRowCount());
  }
  ByteArrayOutputStream sink = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
  try (ArrowStreamWriter w = new ArrowStreamWriter(outRoot, null, Channels.newChannel(sink))) {
    w.start(); w.writeBatch(); w.end();
  }
  outRoot.close();
  try (ArrowStreamReader reader = new ArrowStreamReader(new ByteArrayInputStream(sink.toByteArray()), alloc)) {
    reader.loadNextBatch();
    Field f = reader.getVectorSchemaRoot().getSchema().getFields().get(0);
    ArrowType.Union outType = (ArrowType.Union) f.getType();
    System.out.println("OUTPUT Union.typeIds = " + Arrays.toString(outType.getTypeIds())); // [24, 3]
  }
}

Output:

INPUT  Union.typeIds = [0, 1]
OUTPUT Union.typeIds = [24, 3]     // Utf8=24, SmallInt=3 — Types.MinorType ordinals

The type-id buffer is still [0, 1], so type id 0 is no longer declared.

CANONICAL_UNION_IPC_B64 (a valid pyarrow-produced union IPC stream):

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

Regenerate the input (Arrow C++/pyarrow), which round-trips it correctly:

import pyarrow as pa, base64
children = [pa.array(["Frank", "x"], pa.utf8()), pa.array([9, 5], pa.int16())]
type_ids = pa.array([0, 1], pa.int8())
u = pa.UnionArray.from_sparse(type_ids, children, field_names=["name", "age"])
batch = pa.RecordBatch.from_arrays([u], names=["u"])
sink = pa.BufferOutputStream()
with pa.ipc.new_stream(sink, batch.schema) as w:
    w.write_batch(batch)
print(base64.b64encode(sink.getvalue().to_pybytes()).decode())
# reading arrow-java's OUTPUT back in pyarrow raises:
#   In column 0: Invalid: Union value at position 0 has invalid type id 0
Expected

The re-serialized union should preserve the declared type ids [0, 1] (matching the type-id buffer), i.e. UnionVector.getField() should report the union's actual wire type ids rather than deriving them from Types.MinorType.ordinal().

Notes
  • The corruption is in the schema/getField() type-id derivation, not the data buffers — getField() returns type ids based on MinorType ordinals rather than the union's wire type ids.
  • Constructing a UnionVector fresh via setType(...) and calling getField() returns Union(Sparse, []) (empty type ids), a related manifestation of the same root cause.
  • Searched existing reports: ARROW-1692 (dense/sparse detection on read, fixed 1.0.0) and ARROW-6145 (field metadata preservation, fixed 0.15.0) are adjacent but distinct from this type-id derivation on serialize.

Reported by Rusty Conover (Query Farm — https://query.farm), found while running a cross-implementation Arrow conformance suite.

主要语言
Java
星标
95
派生
154
平均合并
2 天 10 小时
30 天内合并 PR
11

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

apache/arrow-java 的其他 Issue

查看 apache/arrow-java 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Java Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。