Hacktoberfest 2026: những issue maintainer đã đánh dấu cho tháng Mười, đang mở và phù hợp người mới. Xem issue Hacktoberfest

[Vector] Sparse UnionVector re-serialization rewrites schema type ids to MinorType ordinals, breaking cross-implementation interop

Đang mở
#1,308 0 bình luận 0 reaction 0 người được giao Xem trên GitHub

Chưa có ai nhận issue này.

Đánh giá

Độ khó
4/5
Thời gian dự kiến
3-5 ngày
Mức phù hợp với người mới
45/100
Loại issue
Lỗi
Độ rõ ràng
Đặc tả rõ ràng
Mức độ hoạt động
Sôi nổi
Công nghệ
java

Hướng nghiên cứu

The issue is in UnionVector's getField() method, which incorrectly uses MinorType ordinals for type ids. Start by examining the UnionVector class and its getField() implementation. Look at how type ids are derived during serialization. The failing test case is provided; run it to reproduce the error. Check the ArrowType.Union handling and the interaction with Types.MinorType. The fix should ensure wire type ids are preserved in the schema.

Do mô hình lập chỉ mục viết ra từ nội dung của issue.

Mô tả

Summary

Reading a spec-canonical sparse union produced by another Arrow implementation and then re-serializing it through arrow-java rewrites the schema's union type ids from the wire values [0, 1] to the Types.MinorType ordinals [24, 3], while the types (type-id) buffer is left unchanged at [0, 1]. The result is a self-inconsistent union: the buffer selects type id 0, which no longer appears in the field's declared type ids {24, 3}.

Strict Arrow consumers reject the output. Arrow C++/pyarrow RecordBatch.validate(full=True) fails with:

Invalid: In column 0: Invalid: Union value at position 0 has invalid type id 0

(Some readers, e.g. DuckDB, tolerate it by treating the type-id buffer positionally, which masks the problem until a strict consumer sees it.)

Version and platform
  • Reproduced on arrow-java 18.1.0 and 19.0.0 (OpenJDK 25.0.2, macOS arm64). Confirmed still present after upgrading our stack to 19.0.0 — the round-trip produces the same [24, 3] schema type ids over a [0, 1] type-id buffer.

(An earlier revision of this report briefly retracted the 19.0.0 claim while our build was still transitively pulling 18.1.0; a real 19.0.0 build has since confirmed it reproduces.)

Steps to reproduce (pure arrow-java, no third-party runtime)

The input is a canonical sparse union sparse_union<name: string=0, age: int16=1> with a 2-row type-id buffer [0, 1], produced by pyarrow and serialized to an Arrow IPC stream (base64 below). arrow-java reads it, transfers the vectors into a fresh root (a generic pass-through), and writes it back:

byte[] input = Base64.getDecoder().decode(CANONICAL_UNION_IPC_B64);
try (BufferAllocator alloc = new RootAllocator()) {
  VectorSchemaRoot outRoot;
  try (ArrowStreamReader reader = new ArrowStreamReader(new ByteArrayInputStream(input), alloc)) {
    reader.loadNextBatch();
    VectorSchemaRoot in = reader.getVectorSchemaRoot();
    ArrowType.Union inType = (ArrowType.Union) in.getSchema().getFields().get(0).getType();
    System.out.println("INPUT  Union.typeIds = " + Arrays.toString(inType.getTypeIds())); // [0, 1]

    List<FieldVector> moved = new ArrayList<>();
    for (FieldVector v : in.getFieldVectors()) {
      TransferPair tp = v.getTransferPair(alloc);
      tp.transfer();
      moved.add((FieldVector) tp.getTo());
    }
    outRoot = new VectorSchemaRoot(moved);
    outRoot.setRowCount(in.getRowCount());
  }
  ByteArrayOutputStream sink = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
  try (ArrowStreamWriter w = new ArrowStreamWriter(outRoot, null, Channels.newChannel(sink))) {
    w.start(); w.writeBatch(); w.end();
  }
  outRoot.close();
  try (ArrowStreamReader reader = new ArrowStreamReader(new ByteArrayInputStream(sink.toByteArray()), alloc)) {
    reader.loadNextBatch();
    Field f = reader.getVectorSchemaRoot().getSchema().getFields().get(0);
    ArrowType.Union outType = (ArrowType.Union) f.getType();
    System.out.println("OUTPUT Union.typeIds = " + Arrays.toString(outType.getTypeIds())); // [24, 3]
  }
}

Output:

INPUT  Union.typeIds = [0, 1]
OUTPUT Union.typeIds = [24, 3]     // Utf8=24, SmallInt=3 — Types.MinorType ordinals

The type-id buffer is still [0, 1], so type id 0 is no longer declared.

CANONICAL_UNION_IPC_B64 (a valid pyarrow-produced union IPC stream):

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

Regenerate the input (Arrow C++/pyarrow), which round-trips it correctly:

import pyarrow as pa, base64
children = [pa.array(["Frank", "x"], pa.utf8()), pa.array([9, 5], pa.int16())]
type_ids = pa.array([0, 1], pa.int8())
u = pa.UnionArray.from_sparse(type_ids, children, field_names=["name", "age"])
batch = pa.RecordBatch.from_arrays([u], names=["u"])
sink = pa.BufferOutputStream()
with pa.ipc.new_stream(sink, batch.schema) as w:
    w.write_batch(batch)
print(base64.b64encode(sink.getvalue().to_pybytes()).decode())
# reading arrow-java's OUTPUT back in pyarrow raises:
#   In column 0: Invalid: Union value at position 0 has invalid type id 0
Expected

The re-serialized union should preserve the declared type ids [0, 1] (matching the type-id buffer), i.e. UnionVector.getField() should report the union's actual wire type ids rather than deriving them from Types.MinorType.ordinal().

Notes
  • The corruption is in the schema/getField() type-id derivation, not the data buffers — getField() returns type ids based on MinorType ordinals rather than the union's wire type ids.
  • Constructing a UnionVector fresh via setType(...) and calling getField() returns Union(Sparse, []) (empty type ids), a related manifestation of the same root cause.
  • Searched existing reports: ARROW-1692 (dense/sparse detection on read, fixed 1.0.0) and ARROW-6145 (field metadata preservation, fixed 0.15.0) are adjacent but distinct from this type-id derivation on serialize.

Reported by Rusty Conover (Query Farm — https://query.farm), found while running a cross-implementation Arrow conformance suite.

Ngôn ngữ chính
Java
Star
95
Fork
154
Merge trung bình
2 ngày 10 giờ
Pull request đã merge (30 ngày)
11

Hướng dẫn đóng góp

Mở hướng dẫn đóng góp

Bắt đầu từ đâu

  1. Đọc hết issue, rồi đọc hướng dẫn đóng góp của dự án.
  2. Bình luận trên issue rằng bạn sẽ nhận — tránh hai người làm cùng một việc.
  3. Fork repository và làm thay đổi trên một nhánh.
  4. Mở pull request có tham chiếu số hiệu của issue.

Issue khác của apache/arrow-java

Tất cả issue của apache/arrow-java

Issue tương tự

Thêm issue về Java

Nhận issue mới trong hộp thư của bạn

Bản tóm tắt ngắn những issue GitHub phù hợp với người mới.