Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Question: Any projects based on this that ARE trying to be complete like JSDOM?

未关闭
#198 4 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 17 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
20/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
javascript, react
领域
testing, web-dev

调研方向

这是一个探索性问题,而不是范围明确的变更,其中没有指定任何仓库文件或测试。首先检查 LinkeDOM 对 Location、navigator.clipboard 和 Document.createRange() 的处理,然后确定应由现有项目还是新的 polyfill 层来提供缺失的浏览器行为。完成这一事项需要达成一致的范围和实现计划。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

This is a cool project! Context: I'm dealing right now with trying to figure out how to have tests for React components that don't take forever to run, can live in a clean plain old node environment instead of Jest's parallel universe, use tap's API instead of the code poetry like expect(thing).toHave.something('i can never remember this junk').that.isnt.Null(), etc.

I have it working now, but the big bottleneck is jsdom. Every component test takes like 5-10 seconds to spin up, at minimum, for a test that runs in 50ms or less. If they do anything interesting with the dom (which a lot of them do), it gets much worse. I'm starting to see why jest runs tests in the parallel universe that it does.

It seems like @testing-library/react and @testing-library/userevents can almost work, but there are some missing pieces (by design, I realize). I totally understand not wanting to add those pieces to linkedom, and agree with that principle entirely.

So the question is, is there a project you're aware of that uses linkedom under the hood, but then does add that extra stuff? Some of what seem to be missing that I've run into:

  • Location isn't set. (Can kinda hack around it by setting window.location to a URL object, which is close enough, but a proper Location polyfill would obviously be needed for anything doing actual navigation.)
  • Navigator has userAgent, but navigator.clipboard is missing.
  • Document.createRange() returns an object that doen'st have setStart and setEnd methods.

I'm thinking it'd be possible to create a set of polyfills for all these things, and probably end up with something that would really only lack some of the finer points of JSDOM's tree structure, but still be close enough to simulate a browser for react testing.

Is someone doing this already? Or, if not, is there some reason you know of why linkedom isn't a suitable base for something like this?

Thanks!

主要语言
HTML
星标
2.1k
派生
112
平均合并
11 天 1 小时
30 天内合并 PR
1

环境准备

这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南,环境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

WebReflection/linkedom 的其他 Issue

查看 WebReflection/linkedom 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Testing & QA Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。