Agent-mode npm `vex` hashes only the first installed copy of a package, so it attests not_affected while another nested copy of the same name@version is unpatched
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
调研方向
Read crates/socket-patch-cli/src/commands/vex.rs:556 and ecosystem_dispatch.rs:401, then review the verification table in crates/socket-patch-cli/CLI_CONTRACT.md:390. Run the supplied npm reproduction to observe the incorrect not_affected result. Done means agent-mode attestation accounts for every installed copy of the PURL and matches the documented not_applied or hash_mismatch behavior when any copy is unpatched.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
[agent] Found by the scheduled npm bug-hunt routine (ledger #302).
Summary
In agent mode, vex checks only the first installed copy of each manifest PURL (crates/socket-patch-cli/src/commands/vex.rs:556, let package_paths = collapse_to_first(copies.clone());). Hosted-basis PURLs are checked against every copy (vex_consumed::hosted_consumed_copies), but agent records are not. When an npm tree holds several nested copies of the same name@version and only some of them are patched, the verdict depends on crawl order:
- first copy patched, another copy unpatched →
not_affected(wrong); - first copy unpatched, another copy patched →
not_applied(right, by luck).
The Deno routine found this (handover on #302). I confirmed it with plain npm, where the trigger is common: apply patches every copy present, and a later npm install of a new dependent extracts a fresh, unpatched nested copy while leaving the patched one alone.
Impact
The VEX document says not_affected while an unpatched copy of the vulnerable code is still in node_modules and gets loaded by its dependent (is-accessor-descriptor here). apply is fine: re-running it patches the new copy. Only the attestation is wrong.
Repro (real npm, Linux, main 61cfb9b)
SP=/path/to/target/release/socket-patch
mkdir npmdup && cd npmdup && echo '{"name":"npmdup","version":"1.0.0"}' > package.json
npm install [email protected] [email protected] # nests [email protected] under is-number
# Hand-stage .socket/manifest.json + .socket/blobs with a patch for pkg:npm/[email protected]
# that changes package/index.js (beforeHash = pristine, afterHash = pristine + a comment line),
# with one vulnerability carrying a CVE. Any free patch works too.
$SP apply --offline # 1 of 1 targeted patch applied
npm install [email protected] # adds is-accessor-descriptor/node_modules/[email protected], unpatched
$SP vex --offline -O v.json; echo $? # exit 0, 1 statement: not_affected
State after the second install:
node_modules/is-number/node_modules/kind-of 3.2.2 patched
node_modules/is-accessor-descriptor/node_modules/kind-of 3.2.2 UNPATCHED
node_modules/kind-of 6.0.3 (not targeted)
vex output: Wrote OpenVEX document with 1 statement to v.json, status not_affected.
Crawl-order check on the same tree: restore the is-number copy to pristine and patch the is-accessor-descriptor copy instead, and vex omits the PURL (not_applied) and exits with "No applied patches with vulnerability metadata to attest."
Expected vs actual
- Expected: CLI_CONTRACT.md's verification table (
crates/socket-patch-cli/CLI_CONTRACT.md:390) says an agent record is verified against "the installed tree". An attestation should hold only when every installed copy the crawler finds for that PURL hashes to the patched bytes, as the hosted path already requires. Otherwise the PURL should be omitted (not_applied/hash_mismatch). - Actual: only the first copy is hashed, and
not_affectedis emitted with exit 0.
Matrix
| OS | npm | Node | main 61cfb9b |
v4.0.0 (with setup.manual: ["npm"]) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | 8.19.4 | 22.22 | reproduces | not run |
| Linux | 10.9.4 | 22.22 | reproduces (2/2) | reproduces |
| Linux | 12.2.0 | 22.22 | reproduces | not run |
| macOS / Windows | — | — | not probed (the logic isn't OS-specific) | — |
First bad version
This isn't a v5 regression: v4.0.0 emits the same single not_affected statement once setup.manual is set. I didn't bisect further.
Suspect code
crates/socket-patch-cli/src/commands/vex.rs:556:collapse_to_first(copies.clone())feedsapplied_patches_with_vendor, which hashes one path per PURL for agent records.crates/socket-patch-cli/src/ecosystem_dispatch.rs:401:collapse_to_first.
The same pattern probably hits every npm-family layout that can hold several copies of one version (yarn classic and bun hoisted, Deno's hoisted linker, pnpm peer variants), but this issue covers npm only.
Related but different: #325 (bundled copies, hosted in-run --vex), #435 (pnpm global), #405 (bun isolated).
- 主要语言
- Rust
- 星标
- 8
- 派生
- 1
- 平均合并
- 18 小时 19 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 504
环境准备
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 没有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
SocketDev/socket-patch 的其他 Issue
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:npm priority:p3 ux
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1072 · 2 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:yarn-berry priority:p1
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 73/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#783 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Vendored cargo warns cargo_multi_version_old_cargo ("declares no rust-version") when the root package inherits rust-version from [workspace.package]可能已有人在做 关联的 PR 仍在进行中或已合并。 未关闭agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:cargo priority:p2
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#651 · 3 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug bughunt pm:npm
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 45/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1481 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Hosted gem scan ignores a Gemfile `lockfile "custom.lock"` DSL call (Bundler 4), so it pins the unused Gemfile.lock, leaves the real lock untouched, and every frozen install fails可能已有人在做 @mikolalysenko 今天认领。 未关闭agent:claimed agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:bundler priority:p1
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 35/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1477 · 3 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 SocketDev/socket-patch 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
area::tern-sync kind::cleanup triage::ready
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
review-bot
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 64/100
midagedev/bloomery#160 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 62/100
oxidecomputer/humility#737 ·
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 65/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复