Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Ground truth: numcrux transfer/donation (governance decision)

未关闭
#987 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
25/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
冷清
技术栈
kotlin, python, pytorch

调研方向

Start by reading the linked parent issue #984, then review CONTRACT.md and skainet-test-groundtruth/build.gradle.kts for the stated technical preconditions. The issue is done when the owners decide whether to transfer the corpus, what happens to gradienttracer and licensing, and whether CI should use a numcrux-hosted corpus; it does not specify an implementation task.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

question sub-issue

Sub-issue of #984.

skainet-ground-truth's actual Python content is already framework-agnostic — it
imports only torch and gradienttracer, zero SKaiNET/Kotlin coupling. The "SKaiNET"
branding is only in the repo name and README framing, not the code, matching
numcrux's own stated mission ("a public, neutral,
versioned reference-data commons... framework-agnostic and language-agnostic... will
start with the existing numerical test suite from SKaiNET").

skainet-test-groundtruth/build.gradle.kts's fixture-source path is now overridable
(-PgroundTruthSourceDir, defaults to the sibling-checkout convenience it always had),
and CONTRACT.md documents the GGUF tensor-naming/metadata conventions explicitly — so
SKaiNET's consumer no longer needs to change if/when the underlying fixtures move to a
numcrux-owned repo. That was the technical precondition; this issue is the remaining
non-technical one.

Open questions (for whoever owns this decision)

  • Does skainet-ground-truth's content get donated/transferred to the numcrux org
    outright, or does numcrux start a fresh corpus and skainet-ground-truth stays as
    SKaiNET's own (possibly narrower, possibly diverging) fixture set?
  • If transferred: does gradienttracer (the execution/serialization engine) move too,
    or stay under SKaiNET-developers as infrastructure numcrux depends on?
  • License/attribution framing for a neutral commons vs. a SKaiNET-branded repo.
  • Whether SKaiNET's CI (.github/workflows/ground-truth.yml) should point at the
    numcrux-hosted corpus once one exists, via -PgroundTruthSourceDir, or continue
    using skainet-ground-truth as a curated subset.

Not blocking anything today — filed so the decision has a home when it's ready to be
made, and so the "near future" framing from the original ask has a concrete place to
land.

主要语言
Kotlin
星标
52
派生
15
平均合并
1 天 15 小时
30 天内合并 PR
36

环境准备

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 阅读贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

SKaiNET-developers/SKaiNET 的其他 Issue

查看 SKaiNET-developers/SKaiNET 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Kotlin Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。